<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2313-8912</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2313-8912</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2313-8912-2017-3-3-7-12</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1195</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>THEORY OF LANGUAGE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>A VARIANT OF SYSTEM RELATIONS BETWEEN THE PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS UNITED BY THE CONCEPT OF &amp;ldquo;MAN&amp;rdquo; (ON THE MATERIAL OF MODERN ENGLISH)</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>A VARIANT OF SYSTEM RELATIONS BETWEEN THE PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS UNITED BY THE CONCEPT OF &amp;ldquo;MAN&amp;rdquo; (ON THE MATERIAL OF MODERN ENGLISH)</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Kamaydanova</surname><given-names>Nadezhda A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kamaydanova</surname><given-names>Nadezhda A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>nkamaydanova@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution>Vladimir State University named after A.G. and N.G. Stoletovs, Russia</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>3</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/linguistics/2017/3/8-13.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The article deals with the research of semantic relations, namely, hypero-hyponymic relations existing between phraseological units (PU). These relations were analyzed on the example of PU, united by the concept of &amp;quot;man&amp;quot; in modern English. The study confirms that most PU may be classified according to a hyponymic structure. Hyponymy is considered as one of the possible semantic systemic relations between phraseological anthroponyms (PA). PA can build a hierarchy of relationships, i.e. hyponyms are hyperonyms. The article studies the possibilities of subordinating the units of the system to the rule of hyponymic structures. The relationship between PA in the hyponymic aspect revealed a strict hierarchy among PA with positive, neutral and negative evaluation, without violating the positions of hyponyms and the corresponding hyperonisms. Some hyperonyms tend to concretize values. In the article, cases of dehyperonimization and hypo-hyperonical variation are noted. In the analysis of hyponymic relationships, the depth and width of the unfolding of the hyponymic structure is revealed, which determines the specificity and uniqueness of the hyponyms of a small group of phraseological units united by the general concept of &amp;quot;man.&amp;quot;</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article deals with the research of semantic relations, namely, hypero-hyponymic relations existing between phraseological units (PU). These relations were analyzed on the example of PU, united by the concept of &amp;quot;man&amp;quot; in modern English. The study confirms that most PU may be classified according to a hyponymic structure. Hyponymy is considered as one of the possible semantic systemic relations between phraseological anthroponyms (PA). PA can build a hierarchy of relationships, i.e. hyponyms are hyperonyms. The article studies the possibilities of subordinating the units of the system to the rule of hyponymic structures. The relationship between PA in the hyponymic aspect revealed a strict hierarchy among PA with positive, neutral and negative evaluation, without violating the positions of hyponyms and the corresponding hyperonisms. Some hyperonyms tend to concretize values. In the article, cases of dehyperonimization and hypo-hyperonical variation are noted. In the analysis of hyponymic relationships, the depth and width of the unfolding of the hyponymic structure is revealed, which determines the specificity and uniqueness of the hyponyms of a small group of phraseological units united by the general concept of &amp;quot;man.&amp;quot;</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>hyponymy</kwd><kwd>hyperonymy</kwd><kwd>phraseological anthroponyms</kwd><kwd>semantic peculiarities</kwd><kwd>schemes</kwd><kwd>variants</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>hyponymy</kwd><kwd>hyperonymy</kwd><kwd>phraseological anthroponyms</kwd><kwd>semantic peculiarities</kwd><kwd>schemes</kwd><kwd>variants</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>1. Dashevskaya V.L. The role of phraseological units in forming the informative structure of text // MGPIIJ im. M.Toreza № 287. Moscow, 1987. [in Russian].</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>2. Dobrovolskiy D.O. The basis of the structural and typological analysis of the phraseology of modern Germanic languages (on the basis of German, English and Dutch languages). Moscow, 1990. [in Russian].</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>3. Kondakov N.I. Logical dictionary. Moscow, 1975. [in Russian].</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>4. Koralova A.L. The character of information content of phraseological units // MGPIIJ im.M.Toreza №168. Moscow, 1980. [in Russian].</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>5. Kunin A.V. English-Russian phraseological dictionary. Moscow: Rus. yaz. &amp;ndash; 1984. 944p. [in Russian].</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>6. Kunin A.V. A course of phraseology of modern English. Moscow.: Vyssh. shk., Dubna, Izd. centr &amp;ldquo;Feniks&amp;rdquo;, 1996. 381 p. [in Russian].</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>7. Nikitin M.V. A course of linguistics semantics. Saint-Petersburg, 2007. 819 p. [in Russian].</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>8. Nikitin M.V. The foundations of the linguistic theory of meaning. Moscow.: Vyssh. shk., 1988. [in Russian].</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>9. Ogneva E.A. Artistic text as an object of intercultural adaptation. Belgorod, 2009. 208 p. [in Russian].</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>10. Fedulenkova T.N. The General and specific in German phraseology, based on synecdoche (on the material of English, German and Swedish PU with sensor components) // № 10, Vol.9. 2013. [in Russian].</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>