<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2313-8912</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2313-8912</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2313-8912-2017-3-3-22-33</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1197</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>THEORY OF LANGUAGE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>LEXICAL-SEMANTIC AND FUNCTIONAL-SEMANTIC POTENTIAL OF THE NOUN</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>LEXICAL-SEMANTIC AND FUNCTIONAL-SEMANTIC POTENTIAL OF THE NOUN</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Kruchinkina</surname><given-names>Nina D.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kruchinkina</surname><given-names>Nina D.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution>N.P. Ogarev Mordovia State National Research University, Russia</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>3</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/linguistics/2017/3/23-34.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The article presents the lexico-semantic morphology and the functional-syntactic role of the noun as part of speech and the sentence constituent in its nominative role.

Noun in the semantic aspect in its categorical characteristic as part of speech, denoting the substance, prototypically denotatively is in direct connection with the corresponding object (object, person, material substance) of material reality. However, linguists have discovered that within the class of nouns one can distinguish names that are self-sufficient in their semantics and the names &amp;quot;relative&amp;quot;, whose semantics disclosure requires referring to another name addressed to another denotator. This distinction of names is important for lexicology and lexical semantics.

At the same time, both these and other representatives of the substantive class in functional-syntactic manifestation in the nomination of real-life events within the framework of propositional syntagms manifest themselves as functional-synemantic constituents. Such a synthesized description of the noun in its morphological and functional-syntactic semantics appears to be new and important.&amp;nbsp;</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article presents the lexico-semantic morphology and the functional-syntactic role of the noun as part of speech and the sentence constituent in its nominative role.

Noun in the semantic aspect in its categorical characteristic as part of speech, denoting the substance, prototypically denotatively is in direct connection with the corresponding object (object, person, material substance) of material reality. However, linguists have discovered that within the class of nouns one can distinguish names that are self-sufficient in their semantics and the names &amp;quot;relative&amp;quot;, whose semantics disclosure requires referring to another name addressed to another denotator. This distinction of names is important for lexicology and lexical semantics.

At the same time, both these and other representatives of the substantive class in functional-syntactic manifestation in the nomination of real-life events within the framework of propositional syntagms manifest themselves as functional-synemantic constituents. Such a synthesized description of the noun in its morphological and functional-syntactic semantics appears to be new and important.&amp;nbsp;</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>autosemantics</kwd><kwd>synsemantics</kwd><kwd>propositional nominator</kwd><kwd>propositional syntagma</kwd><kwd>noun</kwd><kwd>substance</kwd><kwd>denotatum</kwd><kwd>referent</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>autosemantics</kwd><kwd>synsemantics</kwd><kwd>propositional nominator</kwd><kwd>propositional syntagma</kwd><kwd>noun</kwd><kwd>substance</kwd><kwd>denotatum</kwd><kwd>referent</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Abramov B.A. The syntactic potential of the verb in comparison with the potencies of other parts of speech // Filol. nauki. 1968. № 3. Pp. 34-44.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Admoni V.G. // The completeness of design as a phenomenon of syntactic form // Vopr. yazykoznaniya. 1958. № 1. Pp. 111-117.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Apresyan Yu. D. Research in semantics and lexicography. T. I: Paradigmatics. Series &amp;laquo;Studia philologica&amp;raquo;. M.: Yazyki slavyanskikh kul&amp;#39;tur, 2009. 568 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Arutyunova N.D. Language and the world of man. M.: Yazyki russkoy kul&amp;#39;tury, 1999. 896 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Ahmanova O.S. Dictionary of linguistic terms. 2-e izd. stereotype. M.: Sov. encycl., 1969. 608 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>B&amp;uuml;ler K. The theory of language. Representative function of language. Per. s nem. M.: Progress, 2001. 528 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Vetrov A.A. Semiotics and its basic problems. M.: Politizdat. 1968. 263 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Gak V.G. Theoretical grammar of the French language. M.: Dobrosvet, 2000. 832 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Gulyga E.V. Autosemantics and synsemantics as signs of the semantic structure of a word // Filol. nauki. 1967. № 2. Pp. 62-72.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Gulyga E.V. The theory of the complex sentence in contemporary German language. M.: Vyssh. shkola, 1971. 206 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Zhinkin N.I. Speech as a conduit of information. M.: Nauka, 1982. 157 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Zolotova G.A. Communicative aspects of Russian syntax. M.: Nauka, 1982. 368 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Katsnel&amp;#39;son S. D. The content of the word, meaning and denomination.  3-e izd. M.: Editorial URSS, 2011. 112 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Kruchinkina N.D. Autosemantics and synsematics of components of the predicate structure // Problems of optimization of verbal communication. Saransk: Izd-vo Mordov. un-ta, 1989. Pp. 51-58.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Kruchinkina N.D. Syntagmatics and paradigmatics of propositional nominator. Monografiya. Saransk: Izd-vo Mordov. un-ta, 1998. 104 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Kruchinkina N.D. System of propositional categories // Language and culture. M.: MIIYa, 2003. Pp.194-195.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Lomtev T.P. General and Russian linguistics. M.: Nauka, 1976. 382 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Luriya A. Language and consciousness. Rostov-na-Donu: Feniks, 1998. 414 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Ufimtseva A.A. Lexical meaning (Principle of semiological description vocabulary). M.: Nauka, 1986. 240 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>Shakhnarovich A.M. The language ability of humans: ontogenetic aspect // Shakhnarovich A.M., Yur&amp;#39;eva N.M. Psycholinguistic analysis of the semantics and grammar (based on the ontogeny of speech). M.: Nauka, 1990. P. 19-58.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>Linguistics. Big encyclopaedic dictionary / V.N. Yartseva (Chief ed.). M.: Bol&amp;#39;shaya Ross. entsikl., 1998. 685 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>Bonnard H. Les trois logiques de la grammaire fran&amp;ccedil;aise. Bruxelles: Duculot, 2001. 251 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><mixed-citation>Brousseau A.-M., Roberge Y. Syntaxe et s&amp;eacute;mantique du fran&amp;ccedil;ais. Qu&amp;eacute;bec, Saint-Laurent: Fides, 2000. 352 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><mixed-citation>Bussmann H. Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics. L. and NY: Routledge, 2006. 1335 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><mixed-citation>Cruse, D.A. Lexical semantics. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press ,1986. 310/323 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><mixed-citation>Deloffre F. La phrase fran&amp;ccedil;aise. P.: SEDES,1975.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><mixed-citation>Dubois J. et al.. Dictionnaire linguistique. P.: Larousse-Bordas/VUEF 2002 . 568 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><mixed-citation>Ducrot O. / Todorov Tz. Dictionnaire encyclop&amp;eacute;dique des sciences du langage. P.: Eds. du Seuil, 1972. 480 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><mixed-citation>Fran&amp;ccedil;ois F. La description linguistique // Le langage. P., 1968. P.171-282.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><mixed-citation>Goddard C. and Wierzbicka A. Words and Meanings. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. 314 / 323) p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><mixed-citation>Kerbrat-Orecсhioni C. De la s&amp;eacute;mantique lexicale &amp;agrave; la s&amp;eacute;mantique de l&amp;#39;&amp;eacute;nonciation. Lille: Univ. de Lille III, 1979. En 3 t. T. 1. 597 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><mixed-citation>Kleiber G. Probl&amp;egrave;mes de r&amp;eacute;f&amp;eacute;rence: Descriptions d&amp;eacute;finies et noms propres. P.:Klincksieck, 1981. 538 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><mixed-citation>Quine W. Van Orman. Word and Object. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. 2013. 277/308 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><mixed-citation>Sinclair J. The lexical item // Contrastive Lexical Semantics (Ed. by E. Weigand. Series IV - Current issues in linguistic theory. Vol. 171. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins B.V., 1998. P. 1-24.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><mixed-citation>Tutescu M. Pr&amp;eacute;cis de s&amp;eacute;mantique fran&amp;ccedil;aise. Bucuresti-Paris, Klincksieck, 1975. 258 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><mixed-citation>Verspoor M., Dirven R. &amp;amp; Radden G. L&amp;rsquo;assemblage des concepts: la syntaxe // Linguistique cognitive / Ed. Delbecque N. Bruxelles, 2002. P. 103-136.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><mixed-citation>Verspoor M., Dirven R. and Radden G. Putting concepts together: Syntax // Cognitive Exploration of Language and Linguistics / Edited by R. Dirven and M. Verspoor; in collabor. with J. de Caluw&amp;eacute;... et al. 2nd rev. ed. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins B.V.&amp;nbsp;, 2004. P. 75-100.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><mixed-citation>Willems D. Syntaxe, lexique et s&amp;eacute;mantique. Gent: Rijkuniversitet te Gent, 1981. 276 p.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>