2313-8912Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics2313-891210.18413/2313-8912-2016-2-1-3-9141THEORY OF LANGUAGEMETHODOLOGICAL RESOURCE OF COMMON LINGUISTIC CONTEXT IN THE STUDY OF LANGUAGE INTERACTIONMETHODOLOGICAL RESOURCE OF COMMON LINGUISTIC CONTEXT IN THE STUDY OF LANGUAGE INTERACTIONBarebinaNatalia S.BarebinaNatalia S.svirel23@rambler.ruBaikal National University, Russia20162100

The current state of linguistic science is characterized by considerable variability of scientific schools and approaches. Wherein, the study of the problems of communication remains one of the important trends in the scientific search. Sustained scientists` interest to the dialogical relationship is a general methodological context and a platform for discussion issues of the language interaction in terms of the different academic positions. The tendency to study the issues of linguistic complexity, dynamics, and nonlinearity entails the development of appropriate language technologies. Modeling is one of the competitive research methods of linguistic interaction. The paper argues in favour of the adequacy of the development of the «dynamic dialogic system» scientific construct. We present a number of methodological dichotomies that can be used as methodological guidelines for the system levels design. It is argued that continuity and consistency in the scientific description of linguistic communication is a matter of great importance.

The current state of linguistic science is characterized by considerable variability of scientific schools and approaches. Wherein, the study of the problems of communication remains one of the important trends in the scientific search. Sustained scientists` interest to the dialogical relationship is a general methodological context and a platform for discussion issues of the language interaction in terms of the different academic positions. The tendency to study the issues of linguistic complexity, dynamics, and nonlinearity entails the development of appropriate language technologies. Modeling is one of the competitive research methods of linguistic interaction. The paper argues in favour of the adequacy of the development of the «dynamic dialogic system» scientific construct. We present a number of methodological dichotomies that can be used as methodological guidelines for the system levels design. It is argued that continuity and consistency in the scientific description of linguistic communication is a matter of great importance.

communicationconversationlinguistic technologiesdialogic and monologue theoriescommunicationconversationlinguistic technologiesdialogic and monologue theoriesСписок литературыArhipov I.K. Semantic and Cognitive Structures : Ontology and Functions // Cognitive Studies of Language. V. XXIII : Linguistic Technologies in Humanitarian Researchers. M. : Institute of Linguistics of Russian Academy of Scienses, Tambov : Publishing House of TSU named after G.R Derzhavin. 2015. Pp. 261-270.Bahtin M.M. Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics // Collected works. Works of 1960-1970 years. V.6. M. : Russian Dictionaries. Languages of Slavonic Cultures. 2002. 799 p.Barebina N.S. Models of Communication in Scientific Research in Modern Linguistic Researches // The New Science: from the Idea to the Result. Sterlitamak. RIC AMI. 2015. Pp. 21-25.Boldyrev N.N. Current Problems of Cognitive Linguistics at the Present Stage // Issues of Cognitive Linguistics. 2013. №1. Pp. 5-13.Bronnik L.V. Cognitive Linguosynergetics − a New Stage in the Science of Language and Thinking // Bulletin of Adygeya State University. 2008. Issue 10 (38). Pp. 29-31.Bronnik L.V. In Search of a Unit of Linguistic Communication // Proceedings of the Russian Pedagogical University named after A.I. Gercen. 2009. №106. Pp. 83-89.Zabotkina V.I. Towards Dynamic Model of Knowledge Generation and Transfer by Discourse // Cognitive Studies of Language. V. XXIII : Linguistic Technologies in Humanitarian Researchers. M. : Institute of Linguistics of Russian Academy of Sciences, Tambov : Publishing House of TSU named after G.R Derzhavin. 2015.Zalevskaya A.A. The Problem of Knowledge in Various Angles // Studia linguistica cognitiva. Issue 2 : The science of language in the changing paradigm of knowledge. Irkutsk : BNUEL. 2009. Pp. 14-65.Kolesov V.V. Cognitive Science in the Aspect of Terminology // Issues of Cognitive Linguistics. 2013. №1. Pp.48-54.Kolmogorova A.V. «Mother`s language»: the Practice of Maternal Communication in the Context of a Distributed Model of Language and Cognition. M.: Flinta: Nauka. 2013. 168 p.Kolmogorova A.V. Concepts and Models of Communication in the Contemporary Humanities // Vestnik nauki Sibiri. 2012. №1(2). Pp. 272-277.Koshelev A.D. Modern Theoretical Linguistics // Izvestiya RAN. Series of Literature and Language. 2013. V. 72. № 6. Pp. 3-22.Kravchenko A.V. Cognitive Linguistics Horizon. Irkutsk : BSUEL, 2008. 320 p.Kravchenko A.V. On the Subject Matter of Linguistics // Language and Thought : Modern Cognitive Linguistics. M. : Languages of Slavonic Culteres. 2015. Pp. 155-172.Kravchenko A.V. The Biological Reality of Language // Issues of Cognitive Linguistics. 2013. №1. Pp. 55-63.Kubryakova E.S. In Search of the Essence of the Language // Voprosy kognitivnoj lingvistiki. №1. 2009. Pp. 5-12.Kubryakova E.S. On the Cognitive Science and Current Problems of Cognitive Linguistics // Issues of Cognitive Linguistics. 2004. №1. Pp. 6-17.Li V.S. About Lingvocentric and Anthropocentric Approaches to Language (to the question about the human factor in language) // Proceedings of the International scientific-practical conference «Integration of Russian science in the world: Challenges, Trends and Prospects». M. : Publishing house «Nauchnoe obozrenie». 2014. Pp. 372-382.Linell P. Two Views on the Nature of Language: Formal Linguistics (and its written-language bias) vs dialogical linguistics // Studia linguistic cognitiva. Issue. 3. M. : Flinta: Nauka. 2013.270 p.Maslova Zh.N. Revisiting the Possibility of Knowledge Transfer in the Form of Linguistic Image // Cognitive Studies of Language. V. XXIII : Linguistic Technologies in Humanitarian Researchers. M. : Institute of Linguistics of Russian Academy of Scienses, Tambov : Publishing House of TSU named after G.R Derzhavin. 2015. Pp. 417-426.Piz A. Body Language: How to Read the Thoughts of others in their Gestures. M.: EHKSMO, 2003. 188 p.Cowley S.J. The Codes of Language: Turtles all the Wsay up? // The Codes of Life / M. Barbieri (Ed.). Berlin : Springer. 2007. R. 319-345.De Jaegher H. Participatory sense-making : an enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. №6. P. 485-507.Distributed language / S.J. Cowley (ed.). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 2011. 220 p.Gelder T. van. The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science // Behavioral and brain sciences. 1998. Vol. 21. Issue 5. P. 615-628.Steffensen S.V. Beyond mind : an extended ecology of languaging // Distributed Language. Amsterdam, John Benjamins. 2011. P. 185-210.Steffensen S.V. Care and conversing in dialogical systems // Language Sciences. 2012. 34. P. 513-531.Thibault P. Brain, Mind and the Signifying Body: An ecosocial and semiotic theory. London : Continuum. 2004. 219 p.