2313-8912Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics2313-891210.18413/2313-8912-2019-5-3-0-31765THEORY OF LANGUAGESpecific features of interpretation of markers of social context polarizationSpecific features of interpretation of markers of social context polarizationGlamazdaSwetlana N.GlamazdaSwetlana N.svetlana-glamazda@yandex.ruBelgorod State Institute of Culture and Arts, Russia20195300

The article deals with the text structure as the basis for the text world generation. Text interpretation provides new research opportunities. Text projection of worldview has the polarity as one of its significant properties. The study of the polarization process, i.e. world polarity representations in a text model, has identified various types and subtypes of contextual representation. A detailed study of one of these types, namely, social polarization, determined six subtypes such as: 1) social worldview polarization, 2) social polarization of appearance, 3) social behavioral polarization, 4) social religious polarization, 5) social family polarization, 6) social complex polarization. Social behavioral and social family contextual polarization prevail in the novel “Europeans” by H. James. The high frequency of implicit polarization is determined. A high frequency of conjugation of social polarization and other types and subtypes of contextual polarization was revealed.

The article deals with the text structure as the basis for the text world generation. Text interpretation provides new research opportunities. Text projection of worldview has the polarity as one of its significant properties. The study of the polarization process, i.e. world polarity representations in a text model, has identified various types and subtypes of contextual representation. A detailed study of one of these types, namely, social polarization, determined six subtypes such as: 1) social worldview polarization, 2) social polarization of appearance, 3) social behavioral polarization, 4) social religious polarization, 5) social family polarization, 6) social complex polarization. Social behavioral and social family contextual polarization prevail in the novel “Europeans” by H. James. The high frequency of implicit polarization is determined. A high frequency of conjugation of social polarization and other types and subtypes of contextual polarization was revealed.

literary texttypologyinterpretationcontextual polarizationsocial contextual polarizationcognitive hermeneutic analysismarkerliterary texttypologyinterpretationcontextual polarizationsocial contextual polarizationcognitive hermeneutic analysismarkerСписок литературыBloomer, G. (1984). Society as symbolic interaction, Contemporary foreign social psychology. М., Russia: MSU, 173-179. (In Russian).Glamazda, S.N. (2019). Context linguistic and cultural polarization in the literary concept`s architectonics, Foreign languages: linguistics and methodological aspects, 156-162. (In Russian).Danilenko, I.A. (2017). Stages of text world forming (based on the novel “Tender is the night” by F.S. Fitzgerald), Linguistics horizons, 35-39. (in Russian).James, H. The Europeans (2018). The project Gutenberg E-book. Retrieved from : www.gutenberg.org.Kushneruk, L.S. (2019). Kognitivno-diskursivnoe miromodelirovanie: opyt sopostavitelnogo issledovania reklamnoj kommunikatsii [Cognitive-discursive world-modeling: experience of comparative studies of advertisement communication], Мoscow, Russia: Flinta (in Russian).Lotman. Yu.M. (1992). Cultura i vzryv [Culture and explosion], М.: Progress: Gmozis. (in Russian).Lotman. Yu.M. (2010). Chemu uchatsya lyudi [What do people study], Мoscow, Russia: Rudomino (in Russian).Ogneva, Е.А. and Gusakova, N.L. (2016). Specific features of a text linguocultural dominant (based on the novel “Wuthering Heights” E. Brontë), Philological sciences. Issues of theory and practice, 6 (60), 2, 133-135. (in Russian).Ogneva, Е.А. (2016). Markers of context polarization in the cognitive-plot matrix`s, International journal of applied and fundamental researches, 12, 1, 145-148. (in Russian).Pleskanyuk, T.N. (2015). Text-genic word-formation matrix as a means of forming connectivity in the literary style text. Philology aspect, 1 (1). Retrieved from: http://scipress.ru/philology/articles/tekstokogerentnaya-slovoobrazovatel naya- matritsa-kak-sredstvo-formirovaniya-svyaznosti-v-tekstakh-khudozhestven nogo-stilya.html (Accessed 07 June 2019) (in Russian).Popova, Т.G. (2013). Literary worldview as conceptual literary space, Language and culture in globalization epoch, 2, 1, 95-97. (in Russian).Pruvost, J., Sedykh, A.P. and Buzinova, L.M. (2018). Text, context, intertext: synthesis of sense generation, Research result. Theoretical and applied linguistics, 4, 3. 21-35. (in Russian).Sedykh, A.P (2018). Verbalica and nonverbalica of dialogic interaction Вербалика и невербалика диалогической интеракции, Lexicography and communication – 2018, 159-164. (in Russian).Chernova, K.S. (2016). Cognitive-hermeneutic analysis of the dominant “House” in the context of the novel “Atonement” by I. McEwan, International journal of experimental education, 4-2, 355-358. (in Russian).Yuzephovich N.G. (2013). Worldviews: linguocultural aspect // Translation industry, 1, 363-368. (in Russian).Burr, V. (2003). Social constructionism (2nd Ed.), New York, NY: Routlendge.Cojocaru, S. Bragaru, C. and Ciuch, O.M. (2012). The role of language in constracting social realities. The appreciative inquiry and reconstruction of organizational ideology. Revista de Cerceture si interventie Sociala, 36, 31-43.Dickerson, V.C. and Zimmerman, J.L. (1996). Myths, misconceptions, and a word or two about politics (Special edition on narrative, J.L. Zimmerman & V.C. Dickerson, Eds.). Journal of systematic therapies.Galbin, A. (2014). An introduction to social constructivism, Social Research Reports, 26, 82-92. Retrieved from: www. researchreports.ro. (Accessed Aug 02 2019).Glamazda, S.N., Sorotskaya, A.P. and Verbina, O.V. (2018). Cross-cultural aspects of communicative situation, Coloquium-journal, 10-6 (21), 73-74.Jones, M.N., Dye, M. and Johns, B.T. (2017). Context as an organizing. Principal of the lexicon. Chapter in Psychology learning and motivation. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314237359 (Accessed 03 August 2019).McCarthy, K.S. (2015). Reading beyond the lines. A critical review of cognitive approaches to literary interpretation and comprehension, Scientific study of literature, 5, 99-128.McCarthy, K.S. and Goldman, S.R. (2017). Constructing interpretive inferences about literary text: The role of domain-specific knowledge, Chicago, USA: University of Illinois at Chicago.McNamee, S. (2004). Social construction as a practical theory. Lessons for practice and reflection in psychotherapy. In Pare D., Larner G. (Eds.), Critical knowledge and practice in psychotherapy, 9-21. New York, NY: Yaworth Press.Mead, G.H. (1934). Mind, Self and Society: from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist (edited by Charles W. Morris), Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press.Moghaddas, B. and Dekhnich, O.V. (2015) The philosophy of structuralism in language and linguistics, Scientific research. Issues of theoretical and applied linguistics, 1, 4 (6), 24-29.Ogneva, E.A., Danilenko, I.A., Kireeva, & Y.I. and Kutsenko, A.A. (2015). Interpretative Model of Linguacultural Knowledge. The Social Science, 10:1101-1106. Retrieved from: http://medwelljournals.com/abstract/?doi=sscience. 2015. 1101.1106. (Accessed 05 October 2018).