2313-8912Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics2313-891210.18413/2313-8912-2019-5-4-0-61851COMPARATIVE LINGUISTICSNon-derivative and derivative homonyms in the Russian and Uzbek languagesNon-derivative and derivative homonyms in the Russian and Uzbek languagesKurbanovBakhram Sh.KurbanovBakhram Sh.kurbanov.baxram@bk.ruUzbek State University of World Languages, Uzbekistan20195400

The article discusses some questions regarding non-derivative and derivative homonyms using an example of verbs of the Russian and Uzbek languages. The article discusses the problems of distinguishing polysemy and homonymy, the criteria for determining their boundaries. The basis of the study is the study of the internal structure of the word. The classification of non-derivative and derivative verbs-homonyms of the Russian and Uzbek languages is presented with consideration of the ways of their formation, derivative and non-derivative lexemes depending on the place in the family of words. Examples of word-formation types, in particular, affix word-formation methods inherent in the formation of verbal homonyms in the compared Russian and Uzbek languages are given. The article also deals with the features and distinctive properties of lexical, derivational homonyms, and provides examples of reflected homonymy in the system of the family of words. Families of words are considered as the main criterion for determining the production and non-production of verbal homonyms of the Russian and Uzbek languages. The classification of non-derivative and derivative homonyms of the Russian and Uzbek languages is developed. Examples of compiling families of words of verbs in the Uzbek language are given, taking into account the possibility of the formation of the largest number of derivatives in the structure of the families. Consequently, fragments are shown regarding the organization of reflected homonymy in both Russian and Uzbek. The analyses results indicate that the phenomenon of homonymy in the Russian and Uzbek languages is regular and systemic. The regularity of relationships and interactions of lexical paradigms of the languages being compared in the formation of derivatives, in particular, reflected homonyms, is proved. An important place in this is given to homonymy, arising due to the homonymy of stems and affixes.

The article discusses some questions regarding non-derivative and derivative homonyms using an example of verbs of the Russian and Uzbek languages. The article discusses the problems of distinguishing polysemy and homonymy, the criteria for determining their boundaries. The basis of the study is the study of the internal structure of the word. The classification of non-derivative and derivative verbs-homonyms of the Russian and Uzbek languages is presented with consideration of the ways of their formation, derivative and non-derivative lexemes depending on the place in the family of words. Examples of word-formation types, in particular, affix word-formation methods inherent in the formation of verbal homonyms in the compared Russian and Uzbek languages are given. The article also deals with the features and distinctive properties of lexical, derivational homonyms, and provides examples of reflected homonymy in the system of the family of words. Families of words are considered as the main criterion for determining the production and non-production of verbal homonyms of the Russian and Uzbek languages. The classification of non-derivative and derivative homonyms of the Russian and Uzbek languages is developed. Examples of compiling families of words of verbs in the Uzbek language are given, taking into account the possibility of the formation of the largest number of derivatives in the structure of the families. Consequently, fragments are shown regarding the organization of reflected homonymy in both Russian and Uzbek. The analyses results indicate that the phenomenon of homonymy in the Russian and Uzbek languages is regular and systemic. The regularity of relationships and interactions of lexical paradigms of the languages being compared in the formation of derivatives, in particular, reflected homonyms, is proved. An important place in this is given to homonymy, arising due to the homonymy of stems and affixes.

homonymynon-derivative and derivative homonymsfamily of wordssource wordhomonymynon-derivative and derivative homonymsfamily of wordssource wordСписок литературыAtaeva, R. R. (2019). Structural identity of Russian polypex families of words of asymmetric type, Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk University, Philological sciences, 117, DOI 10.24411 / 1994-2796-2019-10603 (in Russian).Akhmanova, O.S. (1974). Slovar' omonimov russkogo jazyka [Dictionary of homonyms of the Russian language], Moscow, Russia:Russkij yazyk (in Russian).Berezhnyh, E. Ju. (2009). Word-building homonymy in words with the meaning of color (based on the Russian and Spanish languages), Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod University named N.I. Lobachevsky, 6 (2) (in Russian).Golovnya, A. I. (2007). Omonimiya kak sistemnaya kategoriya yazyka [Homonymy as a systemic category of the language], Minsk, Belorussia: Belorussia state university (in Russian).Mirzaeva, Sh. R., Usmanova, S. Yu. (2016). Homonyms of the Russian language in the frequency aspect, Russian language and literature in Uzbekistan – Materials of the Republican scientific-practical conference dedicated to the 125th anniversary of the birth of M. A. Bulgakov, 71-73. (in Russian)Novikov, I. A. (1982). Semantika russkogo yazyka [Semantics of the Russian language], Moscow, Russia: Vysshaya shkola,Pardaev, A. S., Kodirova, Z. A. (2016). Families of words as a criterion for distinguishing non-derivative homonyms in the Russian language, Actual problems of Russian word-formation. Materials of a traditional republican seminar in the framework of the Uzbek scientific school of Russian word formation , 68-72 (in Russian)Pardaev, A. S., Kurbanov, B. Sh. (2015). Typology of homonyms and homonymic families of words in the Russian language, Current problems of Russian word-formation, Samarkand State University, 64-68 (in Russian).Rubleva O. L. (2004). Leksikologiya sovremennogo russkogo yazyka [Lexicology of the modern Russian language], Vladivostok, Russia: DVGU (in Russian).Tikhonov, A. N. (1985). Slovoobrazovatel'ny slovar' russkogo jazyka [Word formation dictionary of the Russian language], Moscow, Russia: Russky yazyk. (in Russian).Tikhonov, A. N., Pardaev A. S. (1989). Rol gnyozd odnokorennyx slov v sistemnoj organizatsii russkoj leksiki. Otrazhennaya sinonimiya. Otrazhennaya omonimiya. Otrazhennaya antonimiya [The role of nests of root words in the systemic organization of Russian vocabulary. Reflected synonymy. Reflected homonymy. Reflected Anthony], Tashkent, Uzbekistan: Fan.Khasanov, E. R. (2016). Factors determining the development of polysemy, The Russian language and literature in Uzbekistan – 2016. Materials of the Republican scientific-practical conference dedicated to the 125th anniversary of the birth of M. A. Bulgakov), 133-134 (in Russian).Mengliev, B., Banriddinova, B., Holijorov, O., Zaripova, M., Hushvaktov, M. (2008). O’zbek tilining so’z yasalishi o’quv lug’ati [Word-formation dictionary of the Uzbek language], Tashkent, Uzbekistan: publ. Yangi asr avlodi,Tursunov, U., Muxtorov, A., Raxmatullaev, Sh. (1992). Hozirgi o’zbek adabiy tili [Modern Uzbek literary language], Tashkent: Uzbekistanpubl. Uzbekistan (in Uzbek).Rakhmatullayev, Sh. (1984). O’zbek tili omonimlarining izohli lug’ati [Explanatory dictionary of homonyms of the Uzbek language], Tashkent, Uzbekistan: publ.Oqituvchi,(in Uzbek).