2313-8912Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics2313-891210.18413/2313-8912-2020-6-2-0-82066LITERATURE OF PEOPLES AND NATIONS OF THE WORLD<strong>Social and cultural basis of language peculiarities in early novel and discourse practice in the second half of the 16</strong><strong>th</strong><strong> century</strong><strong>Social and cultural basis of language peculiarities in early novel and discourse practice in the second half of the 16</strong><strong>th</strong><strong> century</strong>BabenkoNatalya S.BabenkoNatalya S.babenkons@yandex.ruInstitute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia20206200

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;The article verifies the existence of a specific sociocultural situation in German literature of the second half of the 16th century from the standpoint of modern linguistic genre studies. Its distinguishing feature was the development of previous experience in the use of the German language, the expansion of the boundaries of its application in book culture and in discursive practices. These processes found a peculiar refraction in the development of individual genres of texts and in the nature of their interaction. The subject of the study is the formation of early novel prose in German, its origins, incentives and directions of development, interaction with public discourses of its time, in which there are various kinds of typical ideas about good and evil, cheerful and boring, virtuous and vicious. The connection of early novel literature with mass literature of small formats, and primarily with the Schwank genre, which had a recreational purpose in the XVI century: served as a way to switch the reader from a dull daily routine, a state of melancholy and depression into the world of entertaining stories about unlucky characters.

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;The article verifies the existence of a specific sociocultural situation in German literature of the second half of the 16th century from the standpoint of modern linguistic genre studies. Its distinguishing feature was the development of previous experience in the use of the German language, the expansion of the boundaries of its application in book culture and in discursive practices. These processes found a peculiar refraction in the development of individual genres of texts and in the nature of their interaction. The subject of the study is the formation of early novel prose in German, its origins, incentives and directions of development, interaction with public discourses of its time, in which there are various kinds of typical ideas about good and evil, cheerful and boring, virtuous and vicious. The connection of early novel literature with mass literature of small formats, and primarily with the Schwank genre, which had a recreational purpose in the XVI century: served as a way to switch the reader from a dull daily routine, a state of melancholy and depression into the world of entertaining stories about unlucky characters.

social and cultural factorstransition epochnon-ideological discourselanguage proсesses in the early modern periodsocial and cultural factorstransition epochnon-ideological discourselanguage proсesses in the early modern periodСписок литературыBabenko, N.S. (2008). &ldquo;Kurzweil as a phenomenon of Geramn written culture of the 16th century; in German Studies&rdquo;. Scandinavistics. Historical poetics. To the birthday of O.Smirnitskaya,&nbsp; 66-75.&nbsp; (in Russian).Babenko, N.S. (2010). &ldquo;Rannee knigopechataniye v Germanii i yego rol&rsquo; v razvitii kommunikatsii&rdquo;, Yazik. Zakonimernosti razvitiya i funktsionirovaniya. Sbornik k yubileyu N.N.Semenyuk [Language. Patters of development and functioning. Anniversary collection of N.N.Semenyuk], 235-270 (in Russian).Babenko, N.S. (2014).&nbsp; &ldquo;The development of genre forms of mass literature in post-reformation Germany 1550-1618&rdquo;,&nbsp; Dinamika kul&rsquo;turno-istoricheskoy paradigmy: chelovek, slovo, tekst [The dynamics of the cultural and historical paradigm: man, word, text], 146-155 (in Russian).Babenko, N.S. (2018). &ldquo;The terminological base of the German-language version of linguistic genre, in Images of language and zigzags of discourse&rdquo;,&nbsp; Sbornik nauchnych statey k 70-letiyu V.Z.Dem&rsquo;yankova [Collection of scientific articles dedicated to the 70th anniversary of V.Z.Demyankov ], 421-435. (in Russian).Lur&rsquo;ye, Z.A. (2015). &ldquo;Protestant Theater in XVI-XVII centuries as a historical and cultural phenomenon&rdquo;, Religiya. Tserkov&lsquo;. Obshchestvo, III, SPb., 184-205. (in Russian).Meletinsky, E.M. (1988).&nbsp; &ldquo;On the structure of small narrative genres&rdquo;, Etnolingvistika tekst. Tezisy i predvaritel&rsquo;nyye&nbsp; materialy k simpoziumu, 10-13 (in Russian).Oleynik, M.A. (2006). &ldquo;Targeted plan and type of text: aspects of interaction&rdquo;,&nbsp; Zhanry i tipy teksta v nauchnom i mediynom diskurse, 146-163 (in Russian).Semenyuk, N.N. (2006). &ldquo;Esteticheckiy kanon i nekotorye yazykovye charakteristiki nemetskogo prosaicheskogo romana&nbsp; XIII-XV vv.&rdquo;,&nbsp; &nbsp;Yazykovaya norma i esteticheskiy kanon [The aesthetic canon and same linguistic characteristics of the 13-15 centuries, in Language norm and aesthetic canon], 37-53. (in Russian).&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Adamzik, K. (1995). Textsorten &ndash; Textsortentypolgie. Eine kommentierende Bibliographie (Studium Sprachwissenschaft 12).&nbsp; M&uuml;nster, Deutschland.Babb, L. (1965). The Elizabethan Malady. A Study of Melancholia in English Literature from 1580 to&nbsp; 1642,&nbsp; East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.&nbsp;&nbsp;Bloemendal, J., Eversmann, P. G. F., Strietman, E. (2012). Drama, performance, debate, theatre and public opinion in the early modern period: an introduction, Drama, Performance and Debate: Theatre and Public Opinion in the Early Modern Period,1-18.Dieckow, P. (1996). Um jetzt der Katzenborischen art Rollwagenb&uuml;cher zu gedenken&nbsp; &ndash; Zur Erforschung deutschsprachiger Prosaerz&auml;hlsammlungen aus der zweiten H&auml;lfte des 16. Jahrhunderts. Euphorion 90.&nbsp;Foucaut, M. (1973). Arch&auml;ologie des Wissens.&nbsp; Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland.Gumbel, H.&nbsp; (1930). Deutsche Sonderrenaissance in deutscher Prosa. Strukturanalyse deutscher Prosa im sechzehnten Jahrhundert. Germany: Frankfurt am Main.Hertel, V. Textsortenbenennungen im Deutschen des 16. Jahrhunderts , Sprachgeschichte als Textsortengeschichte. Festschrift zum 65.Geburtstag von Gotthard Lerchner. Frankfurt a.M.; Berlin: Deutschland: Peter Lang, 322-329.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Lederer, D. L. (1995). Reforming the Spirit: Society, Madness, and Suicide in Central Europe, 1517&ndash;1809. New York&nbsp; University.&nbsp;Rieche, J. (2007). Literatur im Melancholiediskurs des 16. Jahrhunderts. Volkssprachige Medizin, Astrologie, Theologie und Michael Lindeners&nbsp; Katzipori (1558). (Literaturen und K&uuml;nste der Vormoderne. Bd.1), Stuttgart, Germany: S. Hirzel Verlag.&nbsp;Scherer, W. (1887). Die Anf&auml;nge des deutschen Prosaromans. J&ouml;rk&nbsp; Wickram von Colmar. Stra&szlig;burg-London. Tr&uuml;bner &amp; Co.&nbsp;&nbsp;Schwarz, A. (2000). Die Freude am Guten und B&ouml;sen Zum Verh&auml;ltnis der Textsorten Prosaroman und Schwankroman, Sprachgeschichte als Textsortengeschichte. Festschrift zum 65.Geburtstag von Gotthard Lerchner,155-168.&nbsp;&nbsp;Schwitalla,&nbsp; J. (2000).&nbsp; &nbsp;Wandlungen eines Mediums. Sprachliche Merkmale &ouml;ffentlicher Briefe von Laien in der Reformationszeit, Sprachgeschichte als Textsortengeschichte. Festschrift zum 65.Geburtstag von Gotthard Lerchner. Frankfurt a.M.; Berlin, Deutschland: Peter Lang, 261-279&nbsp;Steger, H. (1998). Sprachgeschichte als Geschichte der Textsorten. Kommunikationsbereiche und Semantiktypen in Sprachgeschichte. Ein Handbuch zur&nbsp; Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und ihrer Erforschung. 2., vollst&auml;ndug neubearbeitete und erweiterte&nbsp; Auflage, hg. von Werner Besch,&nbsp; Anne Betten,&nbsp; Oskar Reichmann,&nbsp; Stefan Sonderegger. 1. Teilband (p.p. 284-300). Berlin /New York, Germany: de Gruyter.&nbsp; Wolf, N.R. (2000). Sprachgeschichte als Textsortengeschichte?&nbsp; &Uuml;berlegungen am Beispiel von Latein und Althochdeutsch,&nbsp; Sprachgeschichte als Textsortengeschichte. Festschrift zum 65.Geburtstag von Gotthard&nbsp; Lerchner,1-99.&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Wolf,&nbsp; N.R. (2009). Alle Sprachwissenschaft ist Textlinguistik,&nbsp; Russkaya germanistika. Yeshegodnik, 223-234.