<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2313-8912</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2313-8912</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2313-8912-2016-2-1-23-30</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">235</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>THEORY OF LANGUAGE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>CONCEPTUAL METAPHOR IN GEORGE ORWELL`S POLITICAL DYSTOPIA &amp;laquo;ANIMAL FARM&amp;raquo;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>CONCEPTUAL METAPHOR IN GEORGE ORWELL`S POLITICAL DYSTOPIA &amp;laquo;ANIMAL FARM&amp;raquo;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Kozlova</surname><given-names>Larisa Ya.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kozlova</surname><given-names>Larisa Ya.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>zyatkova64@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution>Saint-Petersburg State Polytechnic University, Russia</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>2</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/linguistics/2016/1/ling4.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>This article presents the results of the author&amp;#39;s study of conceptual metaphor in political dystopia &amp;ldquo;Animal Farm&amp;rdquo; by George Orwell, an English Socialist writer. The aim of the work was to confirm the hypothesis that the work represents a conceptual metaphorical model &amp;ldquo;Totalitarian state is Animal Farm&amp;rdquo; in both structural and meaningful ways. In modern cognitive linguistics, metaphor is regarded as one of the basic mechanisms of cognitive knowledge, structuring and explanation of the world. Since metaphorization has associative connections within the human experience, it creates metaphors which borrow lexical means and meanings from the fields, which are based on the conceptualization of the people themselves and the world in the process of cognitive activity (the donor sphere). The metaphorical process requires a second element &amp;minus; the target sphere (a new conceptual domain). In describing the metaphorical model, we describe the model scenarios related to the model frames and components of each sample frame slots (as described by A.P. Chudinov). The dictatorship in the USSR during the reign of I.V. Stalin is transferred to the structural organization of the farmyard and the qualities of real people &amp;minus; on animals. Orwell gave each animal (or every kind of it) a certain set of properties, characteristics and actions that we have tried to identify and relate to the corresponding prototype. The donor sphere of the conceptual metaphor in this work is the animal world (naturemorfic and zoomorphic metaphors). The target sphere is the Soviet state with the dictatorship of the leader. The working class and the peasantry are portrayed as a spineless flock meekly obeying the will of the leader, who, with the help of his assistants, operates the &amp;ldquo;flock&amp;rdquo;. The working hypothesis was confirmed. The research results can be used both in the cognitive theory of metaphor, as well as in such areas as literature, discourse analysis, political linguistics, and others.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>This article presents the results of the author&amp;#39;s study of conceptual metaphor in political dystopia &amp;ldquo;Animal Farm&amp;rdquo; by George Orwell, an English Socialist writer. The aim of the work was to confirm the hypothesis that the work represents a conceptual metaphorical model &amp;ldquo;Totalitarian state is Animal Farm&amp;rdquo; in both structural and meaningful ways. In modern cognitive linguistics, metaphor is regarded as one of the basic mechanisms of cognitive knowledge, structuring and explanation of the world. Since metaphorization has associative connections within the human experience, it creates metaphors which borrow lexical means and meanings from the fields, which are based on the conceptualization of the people themselves and the world in the process of cognitive activity (the donor sphere). The metaphorical process requires a second element &amp;minus; the target sphere (a new conceptual domain). In describing the metaphorical model, we describe the model scenarios related to the model frames and components of each sample frame slots (as described by A.P. Chudinov). The dictatorship in the USSR during the reign of I.V. Stalin is transferred to the structural organization of the farmyard and the qualities of real people &amp;minus; on animals. Orwell gave each animal (or every kind of it) a certain set of properties, characteristics and actions that we have tried to identify and relate to the corresponding prototype. The donor sphere of the conceptual metaphor in this work is the animal world (naturemorfic and zoomorphic metaphors). The target sphere is the Soviet state with the dictatorship of the leader. The working class and the peasantry are portrayed as a spineless flock meekly obeying the will of the leader, who, with the help of his assistants, operates the &amp;ldquo;flock&amp;rdquo;. The working hypothesis was confirmed. The research results can be used both in the cognitive theory of metaphor, as well as in such areas as literature, discourse analysis, political linguistics, and others.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>conceptual metaphor</kwd><kwd>naturemorfic metaphor</kwd><kwd>zoomorphic metaphor</kwd><kwd>metaphorical model</kwd><kwd>script</kwd><kwd>frame</kwd><kwd>slot</kwd><kwd>dystopia</kwd><kwd>totalitarian state</kwd><kwd>the dictatorship of the leader</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>conceptual metaphor</kwd><kwd>naturemorfic metaphor</kwd><kwd>zoomorphic metaphor</kwd><kwd>metaphorical model</kwd><kwd>script</kwd><kwd>frame</kwd><kwd>slot</kwd><kwd>dystopia</kwd><kwd>totalitarian state</kwd><kwd>the dictatorship of the leader</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Arutyunova N.D. The &amp;nbsp;Theory of Metaphor. M., 1990. 512 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Budaev A.V., Chudinov A.P. Cognitive Theory of Metaphor: New Horizons. URL: http://www.journals.urfu.ru/index.php/Izvestia1/article/view/ 780 (date of access: February 7, 2016).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Kubryakova E.S. The Initial Stages of Formation of Cognitivism: Linguistics &amp;minus; Psychology &amp;minus; Cognitive Science] / E.S/ Kubryakova // Linguistics Issues. 2006. № 4. Pp. 34-47.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Kubryakova E.S. (general ed.) Concise Dictionary of Cognitive Terms. M.: Philological Faculty of Moscow State University. M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, 1997. 245 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Lakoff George, Johnson M. Metaphors we Live by. Translated by N. Pertsov. M., 1987. 387 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Maslova, V.A. Cognitive Linguistics: textbook / V.A. Maslova. 2nd ed. Mn.: TetraSistems, 2005. 256 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Orwell George. Animal Farm and a Collection of Essays: A Book for Reading in English. St. Petersburg: CROWN print, KARO, 2014. 256 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Chudinov A.P. Russia in a Metaphorical Mirror: Cognitive Study of Political Metaphors. Yekaterinburg, 2001. 238 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Sheigal E.I. Semiotics of Political Discourse. M.: ITDGK &amp;ldquo;Gnosis&amp;rdquo;. 326 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>&amp;nbsp;Chillton P., Lakoff G. Foreign Policy by Metaphor // Language and Peace/ ed. by Ch. Schaffner, A. Wenden. L., N.Y., 2004. P. 37-74.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>&amp;nbsp;Kershaw, Ian. The End: Hitler&amp;#39;s Germany, 1944-45. UK, 2011. 592 с.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>LaFeber W. America, Russia, and the Cold War 1945 - 1984. NY, 1985. 348 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>&amp;nbsp;Turner M., Fauconnier G. Conceptual Integration and Formal Expression//Metaphor and Symbolic Activity. Vol. 10 (3). P.183-204.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>URL: http://www.scodis.com/?q=ru/conceptual_metaphor (date of access: February 8, 2016).</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>