<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2313-8912</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2313-8912</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2313-8912-2021-7-1-0-7</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">2379</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>COMPARATIVE LINGUISTICS</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;Comparative analysis of triggers in Russian and American political discourse&lt;/strong&gt;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;Comparative analysis of triggers in Russian and American political discourse&lt;/strong&gt;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Korolyova</surname><given-names>Lyudmila Yu.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Korolyova</surname><given-names>Lyudmila Yu.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>lyu-korolyova@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution>Tambov State Technical University, Russia</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/linguistics/2021/1/Лингвистика-79-92.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Political discourse is considered from the point of view of the theory of political cognition which unites individual uniqueness, types of political discourse and representatives of political groups and institutions being basic parts of different levels forming the political domain. Semantic and pragmatic categories of political discourse taking into account the theory of mental and context models are analyzed. Triggers as a technique used by politicians to convey information and influence the target audience are studied. Ways to interpret triggers as well as the classification of their types proposed by Russian and foreign linguists are considered. Triggers used by the president of the Russian Federation V.V. Putin and the ex-president of the USA D. Trump in interviews to TV channels and news agencies are analyzed. Types of triggers, their mental and context models, the target audience and functions of triggers in political discourse are identified and compared. The conclusion is made that four of five context models which were identified are similar but the frequency of their use by political leaders is not the same. Different variants of the fifth context model in the examined fragments of political discourse can be explained with the help of one of semantic and pragmatic categories, namely the image of the Russian president and the ex-president of the USA affected by their personal traits of character.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Political discourse is considered from the point of view of the theory of political cognition which unites individual uniqueness, types of political discourse and representatives of political groups and institutions being basic parts of different levels forming the political domain. Semantic and pragmatic categories of political discourse taking into account the theory of mental and context models are analyzed. Triggers as a technique used by politicians to convey information and influence the target audience are studied. Ways to interpret triggers as well as the classification of their types proposed by Russian and foreign linguists are considered. Triggers used by the president of the Russian Federation V.V. Putin and the ex-president of the USA D. Trump in interviews to TV channels and news agencies are analyzed. Types of triggers, their mental and context models, the target audience and functions of triggers in political discourse are identified and compared. The conclusion is made that four of five context models which were identified are similar but the frequency of their use by political leaders is not the same. Different variants of the fifth context model in the examined fragments of political discourse can be explained with the help of one of semantic and pragmatic categories, namely the image of the Russian president and the ex-president of the USA affected by their personal traits of character.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Context model</kwd><kwd>Interview</kwd><kwd>Political discourse</kwd><kwd>Semantic and pragmatic category</kwd><kwd>Trigger</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Context model</kwd><kwd>Interview</kwd><kwd>Political discourse</kwd><kwd>Semantic and pragmatic category</kwd><kwd>Trigger</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Ruzhentseva, N.B., N.N Koshkarova and A.P. Chudinov (2020). Triggery v diskurse vlasti i ih otrazhenie v SMI [Triggers in the power discourse and their reflection in the mass media], Language and culture, 50, 99-114. (in Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Interv&amp;#39;yu TASS &amp;laquo;Ob armii i gonke vooruzhenij&amp;raquo; ot 02.03.2020 [The interview to TASS &amp;ldquo;About the army and the arms race&amp;rdquo; of 02.03.2020] [Online], available at: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/62917 (Accessed 01 February 2021). (in Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Interv&amp;#39;yu TASS &amp;laquo;Ob oppozicii sistemnoj i ne tol&amp;#39;ko&amp;raquo; ot 17.03.2020 [The interview to TASS &amp;ldquo;About systemic opposition and not only about it&amp;rdquo; of 17.03.2020] [Online], available at: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/interviews/62997 (Accessed 29 January 2021). (in Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Interv&amp;#39;yu TASS &amp;laquo;O Rossii na mezhdunarodnoj arene i otnosheniyah s SSHA&amp;raquo; ot 11.03.2020 [The interview to TASS &amp;ldquo;About Russia on the international arena and relations with the USA&amp;rdquo; of 11.03.2020] [Online], available at: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/interviews/62971 (Accessed 29 January 2021). (in Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Interv&amp;#39;yu telekanalu &amp;quot;Rossiya&amp;quot; ot 28.08.2020 [The interview to the TV channel &amp;ldquo;Russia&amp;rdquo; of 28.08.2020] [Online], available at: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/63951 (Accessed 28 January 2021). (in Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Interv&amp;#39;yu telekanalu &amp;quot;Rossiya&amp;quot; ot 07.10.2020 [The interview to the TV channel &amp;ldquo;Russia&amp;rdquo; of 07.10.2020] [Online], available at: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/interviews/64171 (Accessed 29 January 2021). (in Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Albalat-Mascarell, A. and M. Carrio-Pastor (2019). Self-representation in political campaign talk: a functional metadiscourse approach to self-mentions in televised presidential debates, Journal of Pragmatics, 147, 86-99. (in English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Ardila, J. (2019). Impoliteness as a rhetorical strategy in Spain&amp;rsquo;s politics, Journal of Pragmatics, 140, 160-170. (in English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Cambridge dictionary [Online], available at: https://dictionary.cambridge.org (Accessed 26 January 2021). (in English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse: Theory and Practice, Routledge, London, UK, New York, USA. (in English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Coesemans, R. and B. De Cock (2017). Self-reference by politicians on Twitter: strategies to adapt to 140 characters, Journal of Pragmatics, 116, 37-50. (in English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Donald Trump&amp;rsquo;s interview with Time on 2020 of June 20, 2019 [Online], available at: https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/25/trump-interview-with-cnbc-full-transcript.html (Accessed 02 February 2021). (in English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Eisenberg, A. and T. Gamble (1991). Painless public speaking, University Press of America, Lanham, New York, London. (in English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Elder, C. and K. Jaszczolt (2016). Towards a pragmatic category of conditionals, Journal of Pragmatics, 98, 36-53. (in English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Fetzer, A. (2002), Put bluntly, you have something of a credibility problem: Sincerity and credibility in political interviews, in P. Chilton and C. Sch&amp;auml;ffner (eds.) Politics as Text and Talk: analytical approaches to political discourse, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 173-201. (in English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Fox News Sunday&amp;rsquo; interview with president Trump of July 19, 2020 [Online], available at: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/transcript-fox-news-sunday-interview-with-president-trump (Accessed 01 February 2021). (in English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Fries, P. and M. Gregory (eds.) (1995). Discourse in society: systemic functional perspectives: Meaning and choice in language: Studies for Michael Halliday, Ablex Publishing, Westport, Connecticut, London. (in English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Gialabouki, L. and T-S. Pavlidou (2019). Beyond answering: interviewees&amp;rsquo; use of questions in TV political interviews, Journal of Pragmatics, 151, 18-29. (in English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Hague, R., M. Harrop and S. Breslin (1998). Comparative Government and Politics: An Introduction, Macmillan, Basingstoke. (in English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>Jones, B. (ed.) (1994). Politics UK, New York, Harvester Wheatsheaf. (in English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>Katsara, O. (2016). The use of Linguistics in indicating the influence of political power in shaping politicians&amp;rsquo; behaviour: the case of Demetrios D. Bousdras, The Linguistics Journal, 10 (1), 203-226. (in English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>Kenzhekanova, K. (2015). Linguistic features of political discourse, Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6 (6), 192-199. (in English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><mixed-citation>Koteyko, N. (2006). Corpus Linguistics and the study of meaning in discourse, The Linguistics Journal, 1 (2), 132-157. (in English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><mixed-citation>Kotwica, D. (2020). Mitigation and reinforcement in general knowledge expressions, Journal of Pragmatics, 169, 219-230. (in English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><mixed-citation>Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. (in English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><mixed-citation>Miller, D. (1991). Politics&amp;rsquo; in Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Political Thought, Oxford, Blackwell, 390&amp;ndash;391. (in English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><mixed-citation>Pritchard, D. (2006). What is this thing called knowledge? Routledge, London and New York. (in English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><mixed-citation>Reyes, A. and A. Ross (2021). From the White House with anger: conversational features in president&amp;rsquo;s Trump official communication, Language and communication, 77, 46-55. (in English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><mixed-citation>Roeper, T. and E. Williams (eds.) (1987), Parameter setting, D. Reidel, Dordrecht. (in English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><mixed-citation>Roseman, I., R. P. Abelson and M. F. Ewing (1986). Emotion and Political Cognition: Emotional Appeals in Political Communication, in R. R. Lau and D. 0. Sears (eds.), Political Cognition, Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum, 79-94. (in English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><mixed-citation>Sperber, D. and D. Wilson (1986). Relevance: Communication and Cognition,  (in English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><mixed-citation>Trump talks tax cuts, a strong dollar and the wall in an interview with CNBC [Online], available at: https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/25/trump-interview-with-cnbc-full-transcript.html (Accessed 02 February 2021). (in English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><mixed-citation>Tsoumou, J. (2020). Analyzing speech acts in politically related Facebook communication, Journal of Pragmatics, 167, 80-97. (in English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><mixed-citation>van Dijk, T.A. (2002), Political discourse and political cognition, in Paul A. Chilton and Christina Sch&amp;auml;ffner (eds.), Politics as text and talk: analytical approaches to political discourse, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 203-237. (in English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><mixed-citation>What is a trigger [Online], available at: https://www.goodtherapy.org/blog/psychpedia/trigger (Accessed 26 January 2021). (in English)</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>