<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2313-8912</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2313-8912</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">2628</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>APPLIED LINGUISTICS</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;Development dynamics and cognitive-semantic parameters of English ditransitive construction: verification from the perspective of corpus linguistics&lt;/strong&gt;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;Development dynamics and cognitive-semantic parameters of English ditransitive construction: verification from the perspective of corpus linguistics&lt;/strong&gt;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Makoeva</surname><given-names>Dana Gisovna</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Makoeva</surname><given-names>Dana Gisovna</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>makoevadana@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Tishchenko</surname><given-names>Svetlana V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Tishchenko</surname><given-names>Svetlana V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Getmanskaya</surname><given-names>Marina Yu.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Getmanskaya</surname><given-names>Marina Yu.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>getmanskaia@pgu.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><institution>Pyatigorsk State University, Russia</institution></aff><aff id="aff1"><institution>Institute of Computer Science and Problems of Regional Management, Russia</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>7</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/linguistics/2021/4/Лингвистика-83-93.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The relevance of the paper is substantiated by the representation of the analysis of utterances generated on the template of ditransitive construction via the methods of cognitive and corpus linguistics. The set of issues raised by the authors consists in the necessity of looking out for valid reasons and sufficient evidence which confirm that analytical tools of linguistic corpus possess all the necessary resources and effective toolkit to single out the true phenomena of language. The major objective of the research is to explore the potential of corpus linguistics technologies as exemplified by the representative sample of empirical data via quantitative, statistical and collexeme analysis of utterances with ditransitive construction which correlate with its propositions and the scenarios derived from them. The above mentioned methods of corpus-based analysis shed light on the primary scenarios, which motivate ditransitive construction semantic representations; the dynamics of its semantic extension from diachronic perspective; the way ditransitive construction develops in the synchronic aspect; quantitative index of verbs accepted by the construction;&amp;nbsp; semantic parameters of lexical units which objectivize agent, recipient and patient arguments of construction. Relying on the results obtained due to the processing of vast linguistic data from diachronic and synchronic perspective the authors unleash the potential of corpus linguistics technologies and substantiate advantages of their use as a means for verification and extension of information about language facts which emerge within the paradigm of cognitive linguistics theoretical and methodological background.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The relevance of the paper is substantiated by the representation of the analysis of utterances generated on the template of ditransitive construction via the methods of cognitive and corpus linguistics. The set of issues raised by the authors consists in the necessity of looking out for valid reasons and sufficient evidence which confirm that analytical tools of linguistic corpus possess all the necessary resources and effective toolkit to single out the true phenomena of language. The major objective of the research is to explore the potential of corpus linguistics technologies as exemplified by the representative sample of empirical data via quantitative, statistical and collexeme analysis of utterances with ditransitive construction which correlate with its propositions and the scenarios derived from them. The above mentioned methods of corpus-based analysis shed light on the primary scenarios, which motivate ditransitive construction semantic representations; the dynamics of its semantic extension from diachronic perspective; the way ditransitive construction develops in the synchronic aspect; quantitative index of verbs accepted by the construction;&amp;nbsp; semantic parameters of lexical units which objectivize agent, recipient and patient arguments of construction. Relying on the results obtained due to the processing of vast linguistic data from diachronic and synchronic perspective the authors unleash the potential of corpus linguistics technologies and substantiate advantages of their use as a means for verification and extension of information about language facts which emerge within the paradigm of cognitive linguistics theoretical and methodological background.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Cognitive-semantic analysis</kwd><kwd>Corpus-based analysis</kwd><kwd>Ditransitive construction</kwd><kwd>Trend extension dynamics</kwd><kwd>Collexeme analysis</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Cognitive-semantic analysis</kwd><kwd>Corpus-based analysis</kwd><kwd>Ditransitive construction</kwd><kwd>Trend extension dynamics</kwd><kwd>Collexeme analysis</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Biber, D (1993). Representativenesss in Corpus Design, Literary and Linguistic Computing, 8, 243-257. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>British National Corpus [Online], available at: https://www.corpus.byu.edu/bnc &amp;ndash; BNC (Accessed 28.10.2021). (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Corpus of Contemporary American English [Online], available at: https://www.corpus.byu.edu/coca - COCA (Accessed 28.10.2021). (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Dobrovolsky, D. A. (2016). The history of writing as a place for intercultural dialogue, Dialog so vremenem, 57, 347-353. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Dzhndubaeva, N. M. (2015). Cognitive-semantic features of speech units complicated by gerund clauses: on the basis of English language, Abstract of PH. D. dissertation, Philology, Pyatigorsk State University, Pyatigorsk, Russia. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Early English Books Online [Online], available at: https://www.corpus.byu.ed/eebo &amp;ndash; EEBO (Accessed 25 October 2021). (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Egan, T. (2003). Distance and direction: A usage-based study of Infinitive and &amp;ndash;ing complement clauses in English, Ph. D. Thesis, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Fanego, T. (1996). The Development of Gerunds as Objects of Subject Control Verbs in English (1400-1760), Diachnonica, 13. 29-62. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Fanefo, T. (1997). On Patterns of Complementation with Verbs of Effort, English Studies, 78, 60-67. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Fillmore, Ch. J. and Kay, P. (1999). Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: the What&amp;rsquo;s X doing Y construction, Language, 75, 1-34. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Godberg, A. (2010). Verbs, Constructions, and Semantic Frames, Lexical Semantics, Syntax, and Event Structure, 39-58. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Greenbaum, S. and Eckman F. R. (1977). The Linguist as an Experimenter, Current Themes in Linguistics, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, New York, USA. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Jankendoff, R. (2015). Constructions in the Parallel Architecture, The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Johnson, K. (2008). Quantitative Methods in Linguistics, Blackwell, Oxford, UK. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Klepikova, T. A. (2008). Linguistic meta-representations in the grammar of constructions, Izvestiia Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A. I. Gertsena, 66, 47-54. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Kubriakova, E. S. (2012). In Search of the Essence of Language, Cognitive Research, Institut iazykoznaniia RAN, Znak, Moscow, Russia. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Makoeva, D. G. (2018). Conceptual foundations of the variability of the meaning of speech units with the ditransitive construction: on the material of the English language, Abstract of Ph. D. dissertation, Philology, Pyatigorsk State University, Pyatigorsk, Russia. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Manerko, L. A. (2017). What has psychological science given to cognitive linguistics?, Metodologicheskie osnovy issledovaniia kognittsii i kommunikattsii v sovremennoi lingvistike: sbornik nauchnykh trudov v chest doktora filologicheskih nauk, professora L. A. Manerko, MAKS Press, Moscow, Russia, 42-51. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>McEnery, T. and Wilson, A. (2001). Corpus Linguistics: An Introduction, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, UK. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>Naumenko, E. E., Kosinets, I. I., Avanesyan, N. K., Golets, V. A. and Daramilova, Z. A.-G. (2021). Speech Strategies Realization in English-Language Public Service on the Syntactic Level, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 198, 394&amp;ndash;403. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>Ozon, G. (2009), Alternating Ditransitives in English: A Corpus-Based Study, Ph. D. Thesis, London, UCL, UK. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>Rakhilina, E. V. (2000). Kognitivnyi analiz prdmetnykh imen: semantika i sochetaemost [Cognitive Analysis of Domain Names: Semantics and Compatibility], Russian Dictionaries, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><mixed-citation>Rakhilina,&amp;nbsp;E. V. (2010). Lingvistika konstrukttsii [Linguistics of construction], Azbukovnik, Мoscow, Russia. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><mixed-citation>Rakhilina,&amp;nbsp;E.V. (2017). I say, Karl&amp;hellip;, Kompyuternaia lingvistika i intellektualnye tekhnologii, Мoscow, Russia, 384-394. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><mixed-citation>Rykov, V. V. (2012). Course of lectures on corpus linguistics [Online], available at: http://rykovcl.narod.ru/c.html (Accessed 30 October 2021). (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><mixed-citation>Sharov, S. A. (2003). Representative corpus of the Russian language in the context of world experience, NTI, 2, 6, 9-17. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><mixed-citation>Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, Concordance, Collocation, Describing English language, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><mixed-citation>Talmy, L. (2007). Recombination in the Evolution of Language, The Pannels: Papers from the 39th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, CLS, Chicago, 26-60. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><mixed-citation>Time Magazine [Online], available at: http://www.time.com &amp;ndash; TM (Accessed 11.10.2021). (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><mixed-citation>TIME Magazine Corpus [Online], available at: https:///www.corpus.byu.edu/time - TMC (Accessed 20.10.2021). (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><mixed-citation>Tishchenko, S. V. (2004). The context of functioning and cognitive-semantic properties of the construction of the causation of movement and the effective construction: based on the material of the English language, Ph. D. Thesis, Pyatigorsk State University, Pyatigorsk, Russia. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><mixed-citation>Tishchenko, S. V. (2016). On some problems of the linguistic analysis of grammatical constructions (on the example of the result construction and the construction of the causation of movement), Filologicheskie nauki, Voprosy Teorii I Praktiki, 163-166. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><mixed-citation>Waslow, T. (2002). Postverbal Behavior, CSLI, Stanford, USA. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>