<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2313-8912</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2313-8912</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2313-8912-2022-8-1-0-5</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">2711</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>THEORY OF LANGUAGE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;Modeling of text and discourse worlds&lt;/strong&gt;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;Modeling of text and discourse worlds&lt;/strong&gt;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Ogneva</surname><given-names>Elena A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Ogneva</surname><given-names>Elena A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>ogneva@bsu.edu.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Stepanova</surname><given-names>Ludmila Ивановна</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Stepanova</surname><given-names>Ludmila</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>ludmila.stepanova@upol.cz</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2" /></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Chikovani</surname><given-names>Tatiana Владимировна</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Chikovani</surname><given-names>Tatiana</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>tatiana_chykovani@yahoo.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><institution>Vernadsky Crimean Federal University</institution></aff><aff id="aff1"><institution>Belgorod State National Research University, Russia</institution></aff><aff id="aff2"><institution>Palacky University</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/linguistics/2022/1/Лингвистика_79-92.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The article deals with the author&amp;rsquo;s algorithm for modeling both text and discourse worlds. The importance of modeling in the contemporary linguistic paradigm is proved. The model of the text world is interpreted as a combination of three components, such as: (1) the literary conceptual domain, (2) the readers&amp;rsquo; conceptual domains, (3) the interpretive field of the text world model. The model of the discourse world is interpreted as a triad of components such as: (1) the literary conceptual domain, (2) the conceptual domains of communicants, (3) the communicative situation of the informative&amp;rsquo;s existing. The specific features of each component&amp;rsquo;s architectonics in the models of both text and discourse worlds are revealed. Particular attention is drawn to concepts-dominants in the conceptual domain of the informative as the architectonics&amp;rsquo; part in the models of both text and discourse worlds. The significance of cognitive attractors in the conceptual domain of the informative is emphasised. A close relationship is established between the informative&amp;rsquo;s conceptual domain and reader&amp;rsquo;s conceptual domain. The relationship of two components in the worlds models is realised by cognitive attractors. It is determined that the third component in both text and discourse worlds models is fundamentally different from each other.&amp;nbsp; In the model of the text world, there is a mental interpretative projection as the third component&amp;rsquo;s architectonics. In the model of the discourse world, there is an extralinguistic reality as the third component&amp;rsquo;s architectonics. The high verification coefficient of author&amp;rsquo;s algorithm for modeling both text and discourse worlds are substantiated.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article deals with the author&amp;rsquo;s algorithm for modeling both text and discourse worlds. The importance of modeling in the contemporary linguistic paradigm is proved. The model of the text world is interpreted as a combination of three components, such as: (1) the literary conceptual domain, (2) the readers&amp;rsquo; conceptual domains, (3) the interpretive field of the text world model. The model of the discourse world is interpreted as a triad of components such as: (1) the literary conceptual domain, (2) the conceptual domains of communicants, (3) the communicative situation of the informative&amp;rsquo;s existing. The specific features of each component&amp;rsquo;s architectonics in the models of both text and discourse worlds are revealed. Particular attention is drawn to concepts-dominants in the conceptual domain of the informative as the architectonics&amp;rsquo; part in the models of both text and discourse worlds. The significance of cognitive attractors in the conceptual domain of the informative is emphasised. A close relationship is established between the informative&amp;rsquo;s conceptual domain and reader&amp;rsquo;s conceptual domain. The relationship of two components in the worlds models is realised by cognitive attractors. It is determined that the third component in both text and discourse worlds models is fundamentally different from each other.&amp;nbsp; In the model of the text world, there is a mental interpretative projection as the third component&amp;rsquo;s architectonics. In the model of the discourse world, there is an extralinguistic reality as the third component&amp;rsquo;s architectonics. The high verification coefficient of author&amp;rsquo;s algorithm for modeling both text and discourse worlds are substantiated.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Modeling</kwd><kwd>Text world</kwd><kwd>Discourse world</kwd><kwd>Architectonics</kwd><kwd>Conceptual domain</kwd><kwd>Informative</kwd><kwd>Concept-dominant</kwd><kwd>Cognitive attractor</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Modeling</kwd><kwd>Text world</kwd><kwd>Discourse world</kwd><kwd>Architectonics</kwd><kwd>Conceptual domain</kwd><kwd>Informative</kwd><kwd>Concept-dominant</kwd><kwd>Cognitive attractor</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Alefirenko, N.&amp;nbsp;F., Chumak-Zhun, I.&amp;nbsp;I., Ozerova, E.&amp;nbsp;G. and Stebunova, K.&amp;nbsp;K. (2015). Text and discourse: between Scylla and Charybdis of cognitive linguopoetics, Journal of Language and Literature, 6, 2, 157-160. https://doi.org/10.7813/jll.2015/6-2/31 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Alefirenko, N., Gigolayeva, A., Dekhnich, O. and Chumak-Zhun&amp;rsquo;, I. (2019). Discursive-Pragmatic Modeling of the Language Image, Amazonia Investiga, 8, 21, 142-149. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Baghana, J., Buzina, E.&amp;nbsp;I., Glamazda, S.&amp;nbsp;N., Khvesko, T.&amp;nbsp;V. and Lazareva,&amp;nbsp;O.&amp;nbsp;P. (2019). Literary text as knowledge format, Journal of research in Applied Linguistics, 10 (Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Applied Linguistics Issues (ALI 2019) July 19-20, 2019, Saint Petersburg, Russia), 1186-1196. https://doi.org/10.22055/rals.2019.15200 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Belousov, К.&amp;nbsp;I. (2010). Modeling linguistics and lingual reality&amp;rsquo;s modeling issues, Bulletin of Omsk State University, 11 (117), 94-97. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Boldyrev, N.&amp;nbsp;N. (2019). The dominant principle of meaning construction in mind and discourse, in Nolan, B. and Diedrichsen, E. (eds.), Linguistic Perspectives on the Construction of Meaning and Knowledge, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 85-104. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Boldyrev, N.&amp;nbsp;N. (2020). The interpretive dominant in the cognitive theory of language, in Pavlova, A. (ed.), Philological Readings, 83. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, European Publisher, London, UK, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2020.04.02.1 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Bolotnova, N.&amp;nbsp;S. (1992). Hudozhestvennyj tekst v kommunikativnom aspekte i kompleksnyj analiz edinic leksicheskogo urovnya [Literary text in communicative aspect and complex analysis of lexical level&amp;rsquo;s units], Тomsk State University, Tomsk, Russia. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Butakova, L.&amp;nbsp;О. and Myachin, K.&amp;nbsp;A. (2020).&amp;nbsp; The component composition of the conceptual category &amp;ldquo;memory&amp;rdquo; and its role in the meaning formation of contemporary prose texts, Philological Class, 25, 3, 85-99. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.26170/FK20-03-07 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Enpeng, Y., Guoqing, Zh., Ou, J., Shenghua, B., Kailong, Ch., Zhong, S. and Yong,&amp;nbsp;Y. (2014). Probabilistic text modeling with orthogonalized topics, SIGIR&amp;#39;14: Proceedings of the 37th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research &amp;amp; development in information, 907-910. https://doi.org/10.1145/2600428.2609471 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Epifanceva, N.&amp;nbsp;G. (2018). Realities and their place in the language world view, The evolution of the Romance languages: from the language of the people to the language of the nation, Moscow, Russia, 188-193. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Fedotova, О.&amp;nbsp;С. (2021) Printsipy konstruirovaniya angloyazychnogo khudozhestvennogo narrativa (k probleme diskursa i metadiskursa hudozhestvennoj prozy) [Principles of constructing an English-language literary narrative (about issue of both discourse and meta-discourse of prose)], Perspectiva, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Golovanova, E.&amp;nbsp;I. and Kovaleva, O.&amp;nbsp;N. (2017). Cognitive mechanisms of evaluative meaning compression in a literary text, Issues of Cognitive Linguistics, 3 (52), 31-36. https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2017-3-31-36 (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Huxley, O. (2006). Brave New World, Harper Perennial, London, UK. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Karasik, V.&amp;nbsp;I. (2013). Jazykovaja matritsa kul&amp;#39;tury [Lingual Matrix of Culture], Gnozis, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Karasik, V.&amp;nbsp;I. (2020). Jazykovye kartiny bytija [Language view of being], Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Khvesko, T.&amp;nbsp;V. and Tretyakova, S.&amp;nbsp;Yu. (2019). Linguistic and pragmatic aspect of anthroponyms in a literary text, Onomastics of the Volga Region, Proceedings of the XVII International Scientific Conference, Ural Institute of Humanities, Ekaterinbourg, Russia, 522-526. https://doi.org/10.34680/2019.onomastics.5 (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Koval&amp;rsquo;, V.&amp;nbsp;I., Kurash, S.&amp;nbsp;B. and Amatov, A.&amp;nbsp;N. (2019). &amp;ldquo;Text in the world of texts&amp;rdquo; as a global metaphor (intertext - hypertext - corpus of texts), Research Result. Issues of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, 5, 1, 3-12. https://doi.org/10.18413/2313-8912-2019-5-1-0-1 (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Kurash, S.&amp;nbsp;B. (2001). Metafora i ejo predely: mikrokontekst &amp;ndash; tekst &amp;ndash; intertekst [Metaphor and its limits: microcontext - text - intertext], Mozir&amp;rsquo;, Belarus. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Kushneruk, S.&amp;nbsp;L. (2012). Discourse and text worlds: possibility of level stratification of discourse, Political linguistics, 2 (40), 93-101. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>Kushneruk, S.&amp;nbsp;L. (2017). From the text worlds theory to the theory of cognitive-discursive world-modeling: crystallization of the research field, Cognitive studies of language, 30, 269-272. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>Levchenko, M.&amp;nbsp;N., Elisseeva, A.&amp;nbsp;A., Elistratova, I.&amp;nbsp;V., Zakharova, M.&amp;nbsp;Yu., Kazarina, M.&amp;nbsp;A. and Tarasova, O.&amp;nbsp;I. (2013). Interpretacija teksta i ego grammaticheskih modeleĭ (tipologicheskiĭ aspekt) [Interpretation of the text and its grammatical models (typological aspect)], Moscow State Regional University, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>Maslakova, T.&amp;nbsp;P. (2010). Linguo-sociocultural text modeling in the educational sphere, Language, science and technology in modern intercultural space, Proceedings of the International Conference to 35th anniversary of the faculty &amp;ldquo;International&amp;rdquo;, Don State Technical University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia, 42-46. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><mixed-citation>Ogneva, E.&amp;nbsp;A. (2009). Kognitivnoe modelirovanie konceptosfery hudozhestvennogo teksta [Cognitive modeling of the literary conceptual domain], BSU, Belgorod, Russia. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><mixed-citation>Ogneva, E.&amp;nbsp;A., Danilenko, I.&amp;nbsp;A., Kireeva, Y.&amp;nbsp;I. and Kutsenko, A.&amp;nbsp;A. (2015) Interpretative model of linguacultural knowledge, The Social Sciences, 10, 6, 1101-1106. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><mixed-citation>Piotrovsky, R.&amp;nbsp;G. (1998). Modeling in linguistics, Issues of Romance and General Linguistic, 86-96. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><mixed-citation>Saint John (Maximovich), Archbishop of Shanghai and San Francisco. Words and sermons [Online], available at:https://azbyka.ru/otechnik/Ioann_Maksimovich/slova-i-propovedi/ (Accessed 11 January 2022). (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><mixed-citation>Semino, E. (1997). Language and World Creation in Poems and Other Texts. Longan. L., and N.Y., UK, USA. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><mixed-citation>Semino, E. (2000). A Cognitive Stylistic Approach to Mind Style in Narrative Fiction. Cognitive Stylistics, in Semino, E. and Culpeper, J. (eds.), Language and Cognition in Text Analysis, John Benjamins, Amsterdam; Philadelphia, Holland, USA, 95-122. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><mixed-citation>Shatalova, O.&amp;nbsp;V. (2012). Syntactic modeling of a journalistic text as a method of pragmalinguistics, Bulletin of ChelGU. Philology and art history, 2 (256), 62, 140-142. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><mixed-citation>Shchirova, I.&amp;nbsp;A. (2013). Tekst skvoz&amp;rsquo; prizmu slozhnogo [Text through the lens of complexity], Polytechnic-Service, Saint Petersburg, Russia. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><mixed-citation>Shtof, V.&amp;nbsp;A. (1966). Modelirovanie i filosofiya. [Modeling and philosophy], Science, Moscow, Leningrad, Russia. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><mixed-citation>Tataru, L.&amp;nbsp;V. (2008). Compositional Rhythm and Cognitive Logic of Narrative Text (collection of J. Joyce &amp;ldquo;Dubliners&amp;rdquo;), Izvestiya of</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><mixed-citation>Russian State Pedagogical University named after A.I. Herzen, 75, 23-37. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><mixed-citation>Wenyin, L. Quan, X., Feng, M. and Qui, B. (2010). A Information Sciences, 180, 20, 15 October, 4031-4041. [Online], available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0020025510002823 (Accessed 24 December 2021). (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><mixed-citation>Werth, P. (1999). Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. Longman, London, United Kingdom. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><mixed-citation>Zhirova, I.&amp;nbsp;G. (2020). The utterance&amp;rsquo;s structure and the system of linguistic communication means: based on the contemporary fictions, Research Result. Issues of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, 6, 3, 85-98. https://doi.org/10.18413/2313-8912-2020-6-3-0-7 (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><mixed-citation>Zinchenko, Ya.&amp;nbsp;R. (2009). Causal-genetic modeling of the text in the aspect of socio-political communication&amp;rsquo;s teaching foreign languages, Intercultural Communication and Professionally Oriented Teaching Foreign Languages: Proceedings of the III International Conference Dedicated to the 88th Anniversary of the Belarusian State University, 53-57. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>