<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2313-8912</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2313-8912</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2313-8912-2023-9-2-0-2</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">3134</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>THEORY OF LANGUAGE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;Exploring the dynamics of mental lexicon according to the Word Association Test results&lt;/strong&gt;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;Exploring the dynamics of mental lexicon according to the Word Association Test results&lt;/strong&gt;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Stepykin</surname><given-names>Nikolay I.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Stepykin</surname><given-names>Nikolay I.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>nick1086@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Baghana</surname><given-names>Jerome</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Baghana</surname><given-names>Jerome</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>baghana@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2" /></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Slobodova Novakova</surname><given-names>Katarina</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Slobodova Novakova</surname><given-names>Katarina</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>katarina.novakova@ucm.sk</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3" /></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Funikova</surname><given-names>Svetlana V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Funikova</surname><given-names>Svetlana V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>funikova@bsu.edu.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><institution>University of Ss. Cyril and Methdius, Slovakia</institution></aff><aff id="aff2"><institution>Belgorod State National Research University, Russia</institution></aff><aff id="aff1"><institution>Southwest State University, Russia</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/linguistics/2023/2/Лингвистика_9_2_2023-19-33.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The study of the mental lexicon as a dynamic structure that determines speech production is one of the urgent problems of psycholinguistics. The research material included the Russian Associative Dictionary and the results of the 2020 Word Association Test, reflected in the Multilingual Associative Thesaurus of Politeness Project. To identify the dynamics of the mental lexicon, a comparative analysis of associative fields of different fixation periods was applied. In accordance with the theory of speech activity, &amp;quot;cue &amp;ndash; target&amp;quot; combination is a speech action. Its relevant components are ways and means of predication. The ways of predication include sense, semantic and surface syntaxing as operations of speech production. The means of predication are conceptual responses, imagery responses, emotional and evaluative associates and operational responses, which demonstrate the specificity of distributive activation of sense. The paper shows that significant changes have taken place in the mental lexicon. The dominance of language as a reference point in the formation of associative links is typical of speech actions recorded in the Russian Associative Dictionary, since operational responses make up most of the structure of the associative field. According to the 2020 experiment, conceptual responses prevail. This indicates the dominance of cognitive reference points. The nature of imagery responses has changed. Most of them emphasize visual modality now. The analysis of the ways of predication made it possible to clarify the revealed trend of changes in the dominant reference points, which form associative links. It was experimentally established that the proportion of speech actions of the full syntactic cycle decreased by 24% in comparison with the data of the Russian Associative Dictionary, and speech actions of &amp;quot;topic &amp;ndash; comment&amp;quot; format that do not involve semantic and surface syntactic operations increased by 27%. These results indicate a desire to simplify and minimize energy in the process of speech production, and also confirm the changes that have occurred in the simulated fragment of the mental lexicon.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The study of the mental lexicon as a dynamic structure that determines speech production is one of the urgent problems of psycholinguistics. The research material included the Russian Associative Dictionary and the results of the 2020 Word Association Test, reflected in the Multilingual Associative Thesaurus of Politeness Project. To identify the dynamics of the mental lexicon, a comparative analysis of associative fields of different fixation periods was applied. In accordance with the theory of speech activity, &amp;quot;cue &amp;ndash; target&amp;quot; combination is a speech action. Its relevant components are ways and means of predication. The ways of predication include sense, semantic and surface syntaxing as operations of speech production. The means of predication are conceptual responses, imagery responses, emotional and evaluative associates and operational responses, which demonstrate the specificity of distributive activation of sense. The paper shows that significant changes have taken place in the mental lexicon. The dominance of language as a reference point in the formation of associative links is typical of speech actions recorded in the Russian Associative Dictionary, since operational responses make up most of the structure of the associative field. According to the 2020 experiment, conceptual responses prevail. This indicates the dominance of cognitive reference points. The nature of imagery responses has changed. Most of them emphasize visual modality now. The analysis of the ways of predication made it possible to clarify the revealed trend of changes in the dominant reference points, which form associative links. It was experimentally established that the proportion of speech actions of the full syntactic cycle decreased by 24% in comparison with the data of the Russian Associative Dictionary, and speech actions of &amp;quot;topic &amp;ndash; comment&amp;quot; format that do not involve semantic and surface syntactic operations increased by 27%. These results indicate a desire to simplify and minimize energy in the process of speech production, and also confirm the changes that have occurred in the simulated fragment of the mental lexicon.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Mental lexicon</kwd><kwd>Word association test</kwd><kwd>Dynamics</kwd><kwd>Cue</kwd><kwd>Target</kwd><kwd>Ways and means of predication</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Mental lexicon</kwd><kwd>Word association test</kwd><kwd>Dynamics</kwd><kwd>Cue</kwd><kwd>Target</kwd><kwd>Ways and means of predication</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Akhutina,&amp;nbsp;T.&amp;nbsp;V. (1999). Leontiev &amp;ndash; Ryabova&amp;#39;s model of speech generation: 1967-2005, Journal of Psycholinguistics, 6, 13&amp;ndash;27. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Vygotskij,&amp;nbsp;L.&amp;nbsp;S. (1999). Myshlenie i rech&amp;#39; [Thinking and Speech], Labirint, Moscow, Russia</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Zalevskaja,&amp;nbsp;A.&amp;nbsp;A. (1982). Psikholingvisticheskie problemy semantiki slova [Psycholinguistic problems of word semantics], Publishing House of Kalinin State University, Kalinin, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Leont&amp;#39;ev,&amp;nbsp;A.&amp;nbsp;A. (1969) Yazyk, rech&amp;#39;, rechevaja dejatel&amp;#39;nost&amp;#39; [Language, speech, speech activity], Enlightenment, Moscow, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Pishchalnikova,&amp;nbsp;V.&amp;nbsp;A. (2019). Interpretation of Associative Data as a Methodogical Issue of Psycholinguistics, Russian Journal of Linguistics, 23&amp;nbsp;(3), 749761. http://dx.doi.org/10.22363/2312-9182-2019-23-3-749-761</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Sedykh,&amp;nbsp;A.&amp;nbsp;P., Emanuele,&amp;nbsp;V. and Kugan,&amp;nbsp;E.&amp;nbsp;I. (2022). Linguistic and cultural identity: epistemological review, Research Result, Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, 8&amp;nbsp;(3), 2037. http://dx.doi.org/10.18413/2313-8912-2022-8-3-0-2 (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Stepykin,&amp;nbsp;N.&amp;nbsp;I. (2020) Associative field of the concept &amp;lsquo;polite&amp;rsquo;: Dynamics of psychologically relevant content in speaker&amp;rsquo;s lexicon, Science for Education Today, 10&amp;nbsp;(2), 151&amp;ndash;166. http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2002.10 (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Stepykin,&amp;nbsp;N.&amp;nbsp;I. (2022). Dynamics of predication operations in the structure of speech action (based on the materials of the project &amp;ldquo;Multilingual associative thesaurus of politeness&amp;rdquo;), Bulletin of Moscow State Linguistic University. Humanities, 6&amp;nbsp;(861), 86&amp;ndash;92. http://dx.doi.org/10.52070/2542-2197_2022_6_861_86. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Aitchison,&amp;nbsp;J. (2003). Words in the mind: an introduction to the mental lexicon, Blackwell, London, UK. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Bates,&amp;nbsp;E. and Goodman,&amp;nbsp;J.&amp;nbsp;C. (2000). On the inseparability of grammar and the lexicon: evidence from acquisition, aphasia and real-time processing, Language and cognitive processes, 12&amp;nbsp;(5), 507&amp;ndash;584. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/016909697386628 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Bender de Sousa,&amp;nbsp;L. and Gabriel,&amp;nbsp;R. (2015). Does the mental lexicon exist?, Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, 23&amp;nbsp;(2), 335&amp;ndash;361. http://dx.doi.org/10.17851/2237.2083.23.2.335-361 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Carter,&amp;nbsp;R. (1998). Vocabulary: Applied Linguistic Perspectives, Routledge, New York, USA. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203124659 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Cramer,&amp;nbsp;P. (1968). Word association, Academic Press, New York, USA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>De Deyne,&amp;nbsp;S. and Storms,&amp;nbsp;G. (2008). Word associations: Norms for 1,424 Dutch words in a continuous task, Behavior Research Methods, 40&amp;nbsp;(1), 198&amp;ndash;205. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.1.198 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Dell,&amp;nbsp;G.&amp;nbsp;S. (1986). A spreading activation theory of retrieval in language production, Psychological Review, 93&amp;nbsp;(3), 283&amp;ndash;321. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Elman,&amp;nbsp;J.&amp;nbsp;L. (2009). On the meaning of words and dinosaur bones: lexical knowledge without a lexicon, Cognitive Science, 33, 1&amp;ndash;36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01023.x (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Elman,&amp;nbsp;J.&amp;nbsp;L. (2004). An alternative view of the mental lexicon, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8&amp;nbsp;(7), 301&amp;ndash;306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.05.003 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Fitzpatrick,&amp;nbsp;T. (2007). Word association patterns: unpacking the assumptions, International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17&amp;nbsp;(3), 319&amp;ndash;331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2007.00172.x (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Harris,&amp;nbsp;M.; Coltheart,&amp;nbsp;M. (1986). Language Processing in Children and Adults: an Introduction, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, UK.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>Hillis,&amp;nbsp;A.&amp;nbsp;E. (2001). The organization of the lexical system, in Rapp,&amp;nbsp;B. (ed.), The Handbook of Cognitive Neuropsychology: What Deficits Reveal about the Human Mind, Psychology Press, Philadelphia, PA, 185 &amp;ndash; 210.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>Kent,&amp;nbsp;G.&amp;nbsp;H. and Rosanoff,&amp;nbsp;A.&amp;nbsp;J. (1910). A Study of Association in Insanity, American Journal of Insanity, 67&amp;nbsp;(1&amp;ndash;2), 37&amp;ndash;96.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>Levelt,&amp;nbsp;W.&amp;nbsp;J.&amp;nbsp;M. (1989). Speaking: From Institution to Articulation, MIT Press, Massachusetts, USA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><mixed-citation>Levelt,&amp;nbsp;W.&amp;nbsp;J.&amp;nbsp;M. (2001). Spoken word production: a theory of lexical access, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98&amp;nbsp;(23), 13464&amp;ndash;13471. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.231459498 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><mixed-citation>Mcclelland,&amp;nbsp;J.&amp;nbsp;L. and Rumelhart,&amp;nbsp;D.&amp;nbsp;E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings, Psychological Review, 88, 375&amp;ndash;407.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><mixed-citation>Morsella,&amp;nbsp;E. and Miozzo,&amp;nbsp;M. (2002). Evidence for a Cascade Model of Lexical Access in Speech Production, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 28&amp;nbsp;(3), 555&amp;ndash;563. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.28.3.555 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><mixed-citation>Nelson,&amp;nbsp;D.&amp;nbsp;L., McEvoy,&amp;nbsp;C.&amp;nbsp;L. and Schreiber,&amp;nbsp;T.&amp;nbsp;A. (2004). The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, &amp;amp; Computers, 36&amp;nbsp;(3), 402&amp;ndash;407. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03195588 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><mixed-citation>Okamoto,&amp;nbsp;J. and Ishizaki,&amp;nbsp;S. (2001). Construction of associative concept dictionary with distance information, and comparison with electronic concept dictionary, Journal of Natural Language Processing, 8, 37&amp;ndash;54. http://dx.doi.org/10.5715/jnlp.8.4_37 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><mixed-citation>Postman,&amp;nbsp;L. and Keppel,&amp;nbsp;G. (1970). Norms of Word Association, Academic Press, New York, USA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><mixed-citation>Pulverm&amp;uuml;ller,&amp;nbsp;F. (1999). Words in the brain&amp;rsquo;s language, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22&amp;nbsp;(2), 253&amp;ndash;279.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><mixed-citation>Roux,&amp;nbsp;P. (2013). Words in the Mind: Exploring the relationship between word association and lexical development, Polyglossia, 24, 80&amp;ndash;91.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><mixed-citation>Schwartz,&amp;nbsp;M.&amp;nbsp;F. (2018). Theoretical analysis of word production deficit in adult aphasia, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, 369, 1&amp;ndash;10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0390 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><mixed-citation>Seidenberg,&amp;nbsp;M.&amp;nbsp;S. (1997). Language acquisition and use: learning and applying probabilistic constraints, Science, 275&amp;nbsp;(5306), 1599&amp;ndash;1603. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5306.1599 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><mixed-citation>Seidenberg,&amp;nbsp;M.&amp;nbsp;S., Mcclelland,&amp;nbsp;J.&amp;nbsp;L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of visual word recognition and naming, Psychological Review, 96&amp;nbsp;(4), 523&amp;ndash;568. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.96.4.523 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><mixed-citation>Teichmann,&amp;nbsp;M., Turc,&amp;nbsp;G., Nogues,&amp;nbsp;M., Ferrieux,&amp;nbsp;S. and Dubois,&amp;nbsp;B.&amp;nbsp;A. (2012). Mental lexicon without semantics, Neurology, 79&amp;nbsp;(6), 606&amp;ndash;607. http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182635749 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><mixed-citation>Ullman,&amp;nbsp;M.&amp;nbsp;T. (2007). The biocognition of the mental lexicon, in Gareth Gaskell,&amp;nbsp;M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 267&amp;ndash;286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198568971.013.0016 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>