<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2313-8912</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2313-8912</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2313-8912-2024-10-3-0-3</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">3542</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>THEORY OF LANGUAGE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;Receptive and productive activity of non-professional Internet discourse participants&lt;/strong&gt;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;Receptive and productive activity of non-professional Internet discourse participants&lt;/strong&gt;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Savelyeva</surname><given-names>Irina V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Savelyeva</surname><given-names>Irina V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>saviren1973@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Mel’nik</surname><given-names>Natalya V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Mel’nik</surname><given-names>Natalya V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>saikova@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution>Kemerovo State University, Kemerovo, Russia</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/linguistics/2024/3/ВТиПЛ_2024_3_42-69.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The paper examines the non-professional Internet discourse generated by the authors of Internet comments. It is viewed through the prism of the categories of intentionality, as characteristics of a text that has the capacity to express one or another intention of its author, and as communicative intentions realised by a person who simultaneously plays two communicative roles: the reader and the author. The textual data demonstrate that in Internet commenting, an unprofessional personality implements both reception and production within one text unit. The implementation of these global intentions of non-professional Internet discourse is carried out at different levels: syntactic, semantic and pragmatic. The analysis of textual markers of receptive and productive intentions allows us to establish patterns in their implementation through three main text types: cohesion, diffusion and overlapping. Each of the text types has several variants. Remarkably, when generating a text according to the cohesion model, the authors of the comments consistently and explicitly demonstrate the transition from reception to production, as indicated by discursive words, marking the syntactic organization of the commentary. A more complex variant of the implementation of reception and production within the same Internet text is the text type called &amp;ldquo;diffusion&amp;rdquo;. In this model, reception and production are realized simultaneously, due to the closely intertwined markers of reaction and production in the text at the levels of syntax, semantics and pragmatics. Reception is established at the level of non-linear text liaisons as well as semantic and pragmatic characteristics of an Internet comment. In the third model, reception and products are realized using the same textual means. Therefore, the specified text type is called &amp;rdquo;overlapping&amp;rdquo;. In the commentary constructed according to the overlapping principle, the receptive and productive activity of a non-professional personality is explicated at the level of vertical connections of the text and its contextual characteristics. A quantitative analysis of text types according to the selected criteria shows that in Russian-language discourse, the most common variant of the implementation of reception and products is cohesion. The diffusion model is more often presented in English-language discourse. In general, the dual communicative status of the authors of Internet comments was revealed in 19.5% of English-language texts and 27.4% of Russian-language texts. The prospects of the study include conducting a longitudinal experimental study of the intentionality of non-professional Internet discourse.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The paper examines the non-professional Internet discourse generated by the authors of Internet comments. It is viewed through the prism of the categories of intentionality, as characteristics of a text that has the capacity to express one or another intention of its author, and as communicative intentions realised by a person who simultaneously plays two communicative roles: the reader and the author. The textual data demonstrate that in Internet commenting, an unprofessional personality implements both reception and production within one text unit. The implementation of these global intentions of non-professional Internet discourse is carried out at different levels: syntactic, semantic and pragmatic. The analysis of textual markers of receptive and productive intentions allows us to establish patterns in their implementation through three main text types: cohesion, diffusion and overlapping. Each of the text types has several variants. Remarkably, when generating a text according to the cohesion model, the authors of the comments consistently and explicitly demonstrate the transition from reception to production, as indicated by discursive words, marking the syntactic organization of the commentary. A more complex variant of the implementation of reception and production within the same Internet text is the text type called &amp;ldquo;diffusion&amp;rdquo;. In this model, reception and production are realized simultaneously, due to the closely intertwined markers of reaction and production in the text at the levels of syntax, semantics and pragmatics. Reception is established at the level of non-linear text liaisons as well as semantic and pragmatic characteristics of an Internet comment. In the third model, reception and products are realized using the same textual means. Therefore, the specified text type is called &amp;rdquo;overlapping&amp;rdquo;. In the commentary constructed according to the overlapping principle, the receptive and productive activity of a non-professional personality is explicated at the level of vertical connections of the text and its contextual characteristics. A quantitative analysis of text types according to the selected criteria shows that in Russian-language discourse, the most common variant of the implementation of reception and products is cohesion. The diffusion model is more often presented in English-language discourse. In general, the dual communicative status of the authors of Internet comments was revealed in 19.5% of English-language texts and 27.4% of Russian-language texts. The prospects of the study include conducting a longitudinal experimental study of the intentionality of non-professional Internet discourse.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Non-professional Internet discourse</kwd><kwd>Communicative status</kwd><kwd>Author</kwd><kwd>Addressee</kwd><kwd>Global intention</kwd><kwd>Intentionality</kwd><kwd>Reception</kwd><kwd>Production</kwd><kwd>Internet commentary</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Non-professional Internet discourse</kwd><kwd>Communicative status</kwd><kwd>Author</kwd><kwd>Addressee</kwd><kwd>Global intention</kwd><kwd>Intentionality</kwd><kwd>Reception</kwd><kwd>Production</kwd><kwd>Internet commentary</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Arutyunova,&amp;nbsp;N.&amp;nbsp;D. (1981). Addressee factor, Izvestiya Akademii nauk SSSR. Seriya literatury i yazyka [Proceedings of the USSR Academy of Sciences. Literature and Language Series], Nauka, Moscow, Russia, 40&amp;nbsp;(4), 356&amp;ndash;367. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Bart,&amp;nbsp;R. (1994). The author&amp;rsquo;s death, in Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika. Poetika [Selected papers. Semiotics. Poetics], Moscow, Russia, 384&amp;ndash;391. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Bolotnov,&amp;nbsp;A.&amp;nbsp;V. (2015). The idiosyncrasy of an information-media linguistic personality: communicative and cognitive aspects of research, D. Sc. Thesis, Tomsk, Russia, Tomsk State University. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Vinogradov,&amp;nbsp;V.&amp;nbsp;V. (1961). Problema avtorstva i teoriya stilei [The problem of authorship and the theory of styles], Gosudarstvennoe izdatelstvo khudozhestvennoy literatury, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Vinokur,&amp;nbsp;T.&amp;nbsp;G. (1993). Govoryashchiy i slushayushchiy. Varianty rechevogo povedeniya [The speaker and the listener. Variants of speech behavior], Nauka, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Dijk,&amp;nbsp;T.&amp;nbsp;van. (2013). Diskurs i vlast: Reprezentatsiya dominirovaniya v yazyke i kommunikatsii [Discourse and power], transl. by Kozhemyakin&amp;nbsp;Е.&amp;nbsp;А., Pereverzev E.&amp;nbsp;V. and Amatov&amp;nbsp;А.&amp;nbsp;M., Publishing House &amp;laquo;LIBROKOM&amp;raquo;, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Duskaeva,&amp;nbsp;L.&amp;nbsp;R. (2012). The intentionality of a journalist&amp;rsquo;s speech activity: ontology and structure, Saint Petersburg University Bulletin, Series 9, Philology, Oriental Studies, Journalism, 2, 253-260. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Ivanova,&amp;nbsp;I. (2023). Vector variability and the nature of readers&amp;rsquo; reactions to messages in online media, Medialingvistika, 10 (1), 27-46. DOI: 10.21638/spbu22.2023.102 (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Kaminskaya, T. L. (2008). Author and addressee in modern media texts, Saint Petersburg University Bulletin, Series 9, Philology, Oriental Studies, Journalism, 2 (2), 314-319. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Kim,&amp;nbsp;L.&amp;nbsp;G. and Golev,&amp;nbsp;N.&amp;nbsp;D. (2008). On the relationship of the addressee, the author and the text in the paradigm of linguistic interpretationism, Sibirskiy filologicheskiy zhurnal, 1, 144&amp;ndash;153. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Kim, L. G. (2012). Units of description of the interpretative functioning of the text in the addressee&amp;#39;s space // &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Kemerovo State University Bulletin, 1 (49), 186&amp;ndash;190. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Klushina,&amp;nbsp;N.&amp;nbsp;I. (2008). Intentional categories of journalistic text (based on the material of periodicals 2000&amp;ndash;2008), Abstract of D. Sc. Dissertation, Journalism, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Kovalevskaya,&amp;nbsp;N.&amp;nbsp;I. (2022). Digital reading: the formation of a new type of reader, Trudy BGTU, Seriya 4, Print- i mediatekhnologii, 1 (255), 159-165. DOI:&amp;nbsp;10.52065/2520-6729-2022-255-1-159-165 (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Kristeva,&amp;nbsp;Yu. (2004). Izbrannye trudy: Razrushenie poetiki [Selected works: The Destruction of Poetics], G. K. Kosikov (Ed.), transl. by Kosikov,&amp;nbsp;G.&amp;nbsp;K. and Narumov&amp;nbsp;B.&amp;nbsp;P., Rossiyskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya (ROSSPEN), Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Lukina, M. M. (2006). The new life of old newspapers: how the press adapts to a new reader, Moscow University Bulletin, Series 10, Journalism, 3, 52&amp;ndash;59. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Duskaeva,&amp;nbsp;L.&amp;nbsp;R. and Tsvetova,&amp;nbsp;N.&amp;nbsp;S. (eds.) (2012). Mediatekst kak poliintencionalnaya sistema [Media text as a multi-functional system], the collection of papers, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Melnik,&amp;nbsp;N.&amp;nbsp;V. and Saveleva,&amp;nbsp;I.&amp;nbsp;V. (2017). Linguopersonological strategies of text perception (based on the material of online comments on political articles), Bulletin of Kemerovo State University, 4 (72), 197&amp;ndash;204. DOI:10.21603/2078-8975-2017-4-197-204 (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Melnik,&amp;nbsp;N.&amp;nbsp;V. (Ed.) (2021). Problema legitimizatsii v politicheskom diskurse: lingvopersonologicheskiy aspekt [The problem of legitimization in political discourse: linguistic and phonological aspect], Izdatelstvo &amp;laquo;Pero&amp;raquo;, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Mikhaleva,&amp;nbsp;O.&amp;nbsp;L. (2008). Politicheskiy diskurs. Spetsifika manipulyativnogo vozdeistviya [Political discourse. The specifics of manipulative influence], Librokom, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>Prom,&amp;nbsp;N.&amp;nbsp;A. (2020). The types of addressees in media discourse, Medialingvistika, 7 (1), 1, 95-103. DOI: 10.21638/spbu22.2020.108 (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>Putina O. N., Balakin S. V. (2022). Speech communication: pragmatic aspect, Eurasian Humanitarian Journal, 1, 4-9. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>Romantovskiy,&amp;nbsp;A.&amp;nbsp;V. (2024). Narrativization in the genre of Internet commentary when communicating on social networks, Kommunikativnye issledovaniya, 11 (1), 155-170. DOI: 10.24147/2413-6182.2024.11(1).155-170. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><mixed-citation>Savelieva,&amp;nbsp;I.&amp;nbsp;V. (2019). Mechanisms of legitimization in the media discourse (a case study of the Internet media), Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya, filologiya, 18 (6), 188&amp;ndash;198. DOI: 10.25205/1818-7919-2019-18-6-188-198 (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><mixed-citation>Savelieva, I. V. (2021). Neprofessionalny politicheskiy diskurs: lingvopragmaticheskiy i lingvopersonologicheskiy aspekty [Non-professional political discourse: linguopragmatic and linguopersonological aspects],&amp;nbsp; Naukoemkie tekhnologii, Sankt-Peterburg, Russia, 139 p. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><mixed-citation>Tsvetova,&amp;nbsp;N.&amp;nbsp;S. (2012). The author&amp;rsquo;s category in the intentional field of the media text, in Duskaeva,&amp;nbsp;L.&amp;nbsp;R. and Tsvetova,&amp;nbsp;N.&amp;nbsp;S. (Eds.) Mediatekst kak poliintentsionalnaya sistema [Media text as a multi-functional system], Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia, 17&amp;ndash;23. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><mixed-citation>Chepkina,&amp;nbsp;E.&amp;nbsp;V. (2000). Russkiy zhurnalistskiy diskurs: tekstoporozhdayushchie praktiki i kody (1995&amp;ndash;2000) [Russian Journalistic Discourse: Text-generating Practices and Codes (1995&amp;ndash;2000)], Yekaterinburg, Russia. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><mixed-citation>Eco,&amp;nbsp;U. (1998). From the Internet to Gutenberg: Text and Hypertext Excerpts from a public lecture by Umberto Eco at the Faculty of Economics of Moscow State University on May 20, 1998 [Online]. Available at: https://studfile.net/preview/1714056/ (accessed: 12.03.2024). (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><mixed-citation>Cap,&amp;nbsp;P. (2008). Towards the proximization model of the analysis of legitimization in political discourse, Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 17&amp;ndash;41. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.10.002 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><mixed-citation>Creeber,&amp;nbsp;G. and Royston,&amp;nbsp;M. (2008). Digital Culture: Understanding New Media, UK, McGraw-Hill Education. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><mixed-citation>Domingo,&amp;nbsp;D., Quandt,&amp;nbsp;T., Heinonen,&amp;nbsp;A., Paulussen,&amp;nbsp;S., Singer,&amp;nbsp;J.&amp;nbsp;B. and Vujnovic,&amp;nbsp;M. (2008). Participatory journalism practices in the media and beyond: an international comparative study of initiatives in online newspapers, Journalism Practice, 2 (3), 326&amp;ndash;342. DOI:10.1080/17512780802281065 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><mixed-citation>Fetzer,&amp;nbsp;A. and Lauerbach,&amp;nbsp;G.&amp;nbsp;E. (2007). Political Discourse in the Media: Cross-cultural perspectives, Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI:10.1075/PBNS.160 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><mixed-citation>McCombs,&amp;nbsp;M.&amp;nbsp;E. (2005). A look at agenda-setting: Past, present and future, Journalism Studies, 6, 543&amp;ndash;557. DOI:10.1080/14616700500250438 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><mixed-citation>Tsfati,&amp;nbsp;Y. (2014). Uses and perceptions of political media, in Reinemann,&amp;nbsp;C. (Ed.). Political Communication: Handbooks of Communication Science, Volume 18, Berlin, de Gruyter, 489&amp;ndash;506. DOI:10.1515/9783110238174.489 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><mixed-citation>Verschueren,&amp;nbsp;J. (1999). Understanding pragmatics, London, Edward Arnold, New York, Oxford University Press. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><mixed-citation>Wall,&amp;nbsp;M. (2017). Mapping Citizen and Participatory Journalism: In newsrooms, classrooms and beyond, Journalism Practice, 11 (2&amp;ndash;3), 134&amp;ndash;141. DOI:10.1080/17512786.2016.1245890 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><mixed-citation>Wettstein,&amp;nbsp;M. and Wirth,&amp;nbsp;W. (2017). Media Effects: How Media Influence Voters, Swiss Political Science Review, 23 (3), 262&amp;ndash;269. DOI:10.1111/spsr.12263 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><mixed-citation>Wojcieszak,&amp;nbsp;M. and Mutz,&amp;nbsp;D.&amp;nbsp;C. (2009). Online Groups and Political Discourse: Do Online Discussion Spaces Facilitate Exposure to Political Disagreement?, Journal of Communication, 59 (1), 40&amp;ndash;56. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01403.x (In English)</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>