<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2313-8912</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2313-8912</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2313-8912-2025-11-3-0-1</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">3875</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>THEORY OF LANGUAGE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;What happened to Complexity? A review of definitions, measurement and challenges&lt;/strong&gt;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;What happened to Complexity? A review of definitions, measurement and challenges&lt;/strong&gt;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Galiano</surname><given-names>Liviana</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Galiano</surname><given-names>Liviana</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>Liviana.galiano@uniroma5.it</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution>San Raffaele University of Rome, Rome, Italy</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/linguistics/2025/3/Лингвистика_11_3-4-26.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The widely recognised multi-compositionality of linguistic complexity has led scholars to formulate several definitions of the construct according to the perspective taken on the matter in each field. The measurement of English complexity, in particular, seems to have long relied on a few indices, mainly lexical and morpho-syntactic, which in some cases appear to have been preferred over other measures for their ease of computation rather than methodological effectiveness. The picture of complexity emerging from the present review is that of a construct that often still lacks a thorough and shared definition and operationalisation. Notwithstanding these issues, it is argued that investigating linguistic complexity is still important and its study becomes more tractable when 1) it is carefully discerned from cognitive complexity (i.e., difficulty), thus when the linguistic forms characterising a text and their functions are studied separately from the implications these have on cognitive processing; 2) resorting to evidence-based inductive approaches, which reduce the impact of the set of a priori assumptions inherited from traditional categories of linguistic analysis about how language works; 3) adopting a register-functional approach, which adds an explanatory dimension to the study of linguistic complexity by taking into account how the communicative purposes, the type of audience and the production circumstances of a text influence its complexity.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The widely recognised multi-compositionality of linguistic complexity has led scholars to formulate several definitions of the construct according to the perspective taken on the matter in each field. The measurement of English complexity, in particular, seems to have long relied on a few indices, mainly lexical and morpho-syntactic, which in some cases appear to have been preferred over other measures for their ease of computation rather than methodological effectiveness. The picture of complexity emerging from the present review is that of a construct that often still lacks a thorough and shared definition and operationalisation. Notwithstanding these issues, it is argued that investigating linguistic complexity is still important and its study becomes more tractable when 1) it is carefully discerned from cognitive complexity (i.e., difficulty), thus when the linguistic forms characterising a text and their functions are studied separately from the implications these have on cognitive processing; 2) resorting to evidence-based inductive approaches, which reduce the impact of the set of a priori assumptions inherited from traditional categories of linguistic analysis about how language works; 3) adopting a register-functional approach, which adds an explanatory dimension to the study of linguistic complexity by taking into account how the communicative purposes, the type of audience and the production circumstances of a text influence its complexity.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>linguistic complexity</kwd><kwd>review</kwd><kwd>definitions</kwd><kwd>methodology</kwd><kwd>English</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>linguistic complexity</kwd><kwd>review</kwd><kwd>definitions</kwd><kwd>methodology</kwd><kwd>English</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Arends,&amp;nbsp;J. (2001). Simple grammars, complex languages, Linguistic Typology, 5 (2/3): 180&amp;ndash;182. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Bell,&amp;nbsp;R.&amp;nbsp;C. (2004). Cognitive complexity. The Internet Encyclopaedia of Personal Construct Psychology. The Psychology of Personal Constructs. URL: http://www.pcp-net.org/encyclopaedia/title.html [Last accessed 30 October 2023] (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Biber,&amp;nbsp;D., Johansson,&amp;nbsp;S., Leech,&amp;nbsp;G., Conrad,&amp;nbsp;S. and Finegan,&amp;nbsp;E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English, Pearson, Harlow, UK. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Biber,&amp;nbsp;D., Johansson,&amp;nbsp;S., Leech,&amp;nbsp;G., Conrad,&amp;nbsp;S. and Finegan,&amp;nbsp;E. (2021). Grammar of Spoken and Written English, John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, Netherlands/USA. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.232 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Biber,&amp;nbsp;D., Gray,&amp;nbsp;B., Staples,&amp;nbsp;S. and Egbert,&amp;nbsp;J. (2022). The Register-Functional Approach to Grammatical Complexity: Theoretical Foundation, Descriptive Research Findings, Application, Routledge, New York/London, USA/UK. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003087991 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Bieri,&amp;nbsp;J. (1955). Cognitive complexity-simplicity and predictive behavior, The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51&amp;nbsp;(2), 263&amp;ndash;268. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043308 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Bisang,&amp;nbsp;W. (2009). On the evolution of complexity: sometimes less is more in East and mainland Southeast Asia, in Sampson,&amp;nbsp;G., Gil,&amp;nbsp;D. and Trudgill,&amp;nbsp;P. (eds.), Language Complexity as an Evolving Variable, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 34&amp;ndash;49. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199545216.003.0003 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Bley-Vroman,&amp;nbsp;R. (2002). Frequency in production, comprehension and acquisition, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24&amp;nbsp;(2), 209&amp;ndash;213. https://doi.org/10.1017/s027226310200205x (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Booij,&amp;nbsp;G. (2012). Construction morphology: a brief introduction, Morphology, 22, 343&amp;ndash;346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-012-9209-x (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Botel,&amp;nbsp;M., Dawkins,&amp;nbsp;J. and Granowsky,&amp;nbsp;A. (1973). A Syntactic Complexity Formula, in MacGinitie,&amp;nbsp;W.&amp;nbsp;H. (ed.), Assessment Problems in Reading, DE: International Reading Association, Newark, USA, 77&amp;ndash;86. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Brown,&amp;nbsp;R. (1973). A first language, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, UK. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Bult&amp;eacute;,&amp;nbsp;B., Housen,&amp;nbsp;A. (2012). Defining and operationalising L2 complexity, in Housen,&amp;nbsp;A., Kuiken,&amp;nbsp;F. and Vedder,&amp;nbsp;I. (eds.), Dimensions of L2 Performance and Proficiency: Investigating Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in SLA, John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, 21&amp;ndash;46. (In English) https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.32.02bul&amp;nbsp;</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Burleson,&amp;nbsp;B.&amp;nbsp;R., Caplan,&amp;nbsp;S.&amp;nbsp;E. (1998). Cognitive complexity, in McCroskey,&amp;nbsp;J.&amp;nbsp;C., Daly,&amp;nbsp;J.&amp;nbsp;A., Martin,&amp;nbsp;M.&amp;nbsp;M. and Beatty,&amp;nbsp;M.&amp;nbsp;J. (eds.), Communication and personality: Trait perspectives, Hampton Press, Creskill, USA, 233&amp;ndash;286. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Bygate,&amp;nbsp;M. (1996). Effects of task repetition: Appraising the developing language of learners, in Willis,&amp;nbsp;J. and Willis,&amp;nbsp;D. (eds.). Challenge and change in language teaching, Heinemann, London, 136&amp;ndash;146. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Bygate,&amp;nbsp;M. (1999). Quality of language and purpose of task: Patterns of learners&amp;rsquo; language on two oral communication tasks, Language Teaching Research, 3&amp;nbsp;(3), 185&amp;ndash;214. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Bybee,&amp;nbsp;J. (2008). Usage-based grammar and second language acquisition, in Robinson,&amp;nbsp;P., Ellis,&amp;nbsp;N.&amp;nbsp;C. (eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition, Routledge, New York, USA, 216&amp;ndash;236. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203938560-18 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Byrnes,&amp;nbsp;H., Sinicrope,&amp;nbsp;C. (2008). Advancedness and the development of relativization in L2 German: A curriculum-based longitudinal study, in Ortega,&amp;nbsp;L., Byrnes,&amp;nbsp;H. (eds.), The Longitudinal Study of Advanced L2 Capacities, Routledge, London, UK, Chapter 7 pt. II. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203871652 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Candlin,&amp;nbsp;C. (1987). Towards task-based language learning, in Candlin,&amp;nbsp;C. and Murphy,&amp;nbsp;D. (eds.), Language learning tasks, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, USA, 5&amp;ndash;22. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Carter,&amp;nbsp;R., McCarthy,&amp;nbsp;M. (2006). Cambridge Grammar of English, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. https://doi.org/10.4312/vestnik.1.207-211 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>Caruana,&amp;nbsp;S. (2006). Trilingualism in Malta. Maltese, English and Italiano Televisivo, International Journal of Multilingualism, 3&amp;nbsp;(3), 159&amp;ndash;172. https://doi.org/10.2167/ijm024.0 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>Chomsky,&amp;nbsp;N. (1957). Syntactic Structures, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin/New York. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>Collentine,&amp;nbsp;J. (2004). The effects of learning contexts on morphosyntactic and lexical development, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26&amp;nbsp;(2), 227&amp;ndash;248. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263104262040 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><mixed-citation>Dahl,&amp;nbsp;&amp;Ouml;. (2004). The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.71 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><mixed-citation>Dammel,&amp;nbsp;A., K&amp;uuml;rschner,&amp;nbsp;S. (2008). Complexity in nominal plural allomorphy, in Miestamo,&amp;nbsp;M., Sinnem&amp;auml;ki,&amp;nbsp;K. and Karlsson,&amp;nbsp;F. (eds.), Language Complexity: Typology, Contact, Change, Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, Netherlands/USA, 243&amp;ndash;262. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.94 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><mixed-citation>DeKeyser,&amp;nbsp;R. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar, in Doughty,&amp;nbsp;C., Williams,&amp;nbsp;J. (eds.). Focus on Form in Classroom Language Acquisition, Cambridge University Press, New York, USA, 42&amp;ndash;63. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><mixed-citation>DeKeyser,&amp;nbsp;R.&amp;nbsp;M. (2005). What makes learning second-language grammar difficult? A review of issues, Language Learning, 55 (Suppl. 1), 1&amp;ndash;25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00294.x (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><mixed-citation>Derwing,&amp;nbsp;T.&amp;nbsp;M., Rossiter,&amp;nbsp;M.&amp;nbsp;J. (2003). The effects of pronunciation instruction on the accuracy, fluency, and complexity of L2 accented speech, Applied Language Learning, 13, 1&amp;ndash;17. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><mixed-citation>Dewaele,&amp;nbsp;J.-M. (2000). Saisir l&amp;rsquo;insaisissable? Les mesures de longueur d&amp;rsquo;&amp;eacute;nonc&amp;eacute;s en linguistique appliqu&amp;eacute;e, International Review of Applied Linguistics, 38, 17&amp;ndash;33. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2000.38.1.17 (In French)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><mixed-citation>Diessel,&amp;nbsp;H. (2004). The Acquisition of Complex Sentences, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511486531 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><mixed-citation>Diessel,&amp;nbsp;H., Tomasello,&amp;nbsp;M. (2001). The acquisition of finite complement clauses in English: A corpus-based analysis, Cognitive Linguistics, 12, 97&amp;ndash;142. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.12.2.97 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><mixed-citation>Di&amp;nbsp;Garbo,&amp;nbsp;F., Miestamo,&amp;nbsp;M. (2019). The evolving complexity of gender agreement systems, in Di&amp;nbsp;Garbo,&amp;nbsp;F., Olsson,&amp;nbsp;B. and W&amp;auml;lchli,&amp;nbsp;B. (eds.), Grammatical gender and linguistic complexity: Volume II: World-wide comparative studies, Language Science Press, Berlin, Germany, 15&amp;ndash;60. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><mixed-citation>Doughty,&amp;nbsp;C. and Williams,&amp;nbsp;J. (1998). Pedagogical choices in focus on form, in Doughty,&amp;nbsp;C., Williams,&amp;nbsp;J. (eds.), Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition, Cambridge University Press, New York, USA, 197&amp;ndash;261. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><mixed-citation>Dryer,&amp;nbsp;M. (2007). Word order, in Shopen,&amp;nbsp;T. (ed), Clause Structure, Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 1. Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 61&amp;ndash;131. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511619427.002 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><mixed-citation>DuBay, W.H. (2004). The Principles of Readability. Impact Information, Costa Mesa. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><mixed-citation>Ellis,&amp;nbsp;R. (1990). Instructed second language acquisition, Blackwell, Oxford, UK. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><mixed-citation>Ellis,&amp;nbsp;R. (1999). Factors in the incidental acquisition of second language vocabulary from oral input, in Ellis, R. (ed), Learning a Second Language through Interaction, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 35&amp;ndash;61. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><mixed-citation>Ellis,&amp;nbsp;R., Barkhuizen,&amp;nbsp;G. (2005). Analysing learner language, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. https://doi.org/10.4000/asp.631 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><mixed-citation>Fenk-Oczlon,&amp;nbsp;G., Fenk,&amp;nbsp;A. (2008). Complexity trade-offs between the subsystems of language, in Miestamo,&amp;nbsp;M., Sinnem&amp;auml;ki,&amp;nbsp;K. and Karlsson,&amp;nbsp;F. (eds.), Language Complexity: Typology, Contact, Change, Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, Netherlands/USA, 43&amp;ndash;65. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.94.05fen (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><mixed-citation>Flesch, R. (1948). Marks of a readable style, Columbia University contributions to education, 187, Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><mixed-citation>Foster,&amp;nbsp;P., Tonkyn,&amp;nbsp;A. and Wigglesworth,&amp;nbsp;G. (2000). Measuring spoken language: a unit for all reasons, Applied Linguistics, 21&amp;nbsp;(3), 354&amp;ndash;375. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.3.354 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><mixed-citation>Fry,&amp;nbsp;E.&amp;nbsp;B. (1968). A readability formula that saves time, Journal of reading, 11, 513&amp;ndash;516.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B42"><mixed-citation>Gagarina,&amp;nbsp;N. (2002). Thoughts on optional infinitives (in Russian), in Hole,&amp;nbsp;D. Law,&amp;nbsp;P. and Zhang,&amp;nbsp;N. (eds.), Linguistics by Heart. Webfest for Horst-Dieter Gasde, Zentrum f&amp;uuml;r Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Berlin, Germany, 1&amp;ndash;23. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B43"><mixed-citation>Ghia,&amp;nbsp;E. (2007). A case study on the role of interlingual subtitles on the acquisition of L2 syntax &amp;ndash; initial results, in Baicchi,&amp;nbsp;A. (ed) Voices on Translation. Linguistic, Multimedia and Cognitive Perspectives. Special Issue of RILA, Rassegna Italiana di Linguistica Applicata, Bulzoni, Rome, Italy, 167&amp;ndash;177. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B44"><mixed-citation>Giv&amp;oacute;n,&amp;nbsp;T. (2009). The genesis of syntactic complexity: diachrony, ontogeny, neuro-cognition, evolution, Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, Netherlands/USA. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.146 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B45"><mixed-citation>Goldschneider,&amp;nbsp;J., DeKeyser,&amp;nbsp;R. (2001). Explaining the &amp;lsquo;natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition&amp;rsquo; in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants, Language Learning, 51&amp;nbsp;(1), 1&amp;ndash;50. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00147 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B46"><mixed-citation>Gray, W. S., Leary, B. (1935). What makes a book readable, Chicago University Press, Chicago, US. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B47"><mixed-citation>Greenbaum,&amp;nbsp;S., Nelson,&amp;nbsp;G. (1995). Clause relationships in spoken and written English, Functions of Language, 2&amp;nbsp;(1), 1&amp;ndash;21. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B48"><mixed-citation>Griffin,&amp;nbsp;Z.&amp;nbsp;M., Ferreira,&amp;nbsp;V.&amp;nbsp;S. (2006). Properties of spoken language production, in Traxler,&amp;nbsp;M.&amp;nbsp;J., Gernsbacher,&amp;nbsp;M.&amp;nbsp;A. (eds.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B49"><mixed-citation>), Handbook of Psycholinguistics, Elsevier, San Diego, USA, 21&amp;ndash;59. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-012369374-7/50003-1 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B50"><mixed-citation>Halliday,&amp;nbsp;M.&amp;nbsp;A.&amp;nbsp;K. (1985). Spoken and Written Language, Vic, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Australia. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B51"><mixed-citation>Haspelmath,&amp;nbsp;M., Sims,&amp;nbsp;A.&amp;nbsp;D. (2010). Understanding Morphology, Hodder Education, London, UK. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203776506 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B52"><mixed-citation>Housen,&amp;nbsp;A., De&amp;nbsp;Clercq,&amp;nbsp;B., Kuiken,&amp;nbsp;F. and Vedder,&amp;nbsp;I. (2019). Multiple approaches to complexity in second language research, Second Language Research, 35&amp;nbsp;(1), 3&amp;ndash;21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658318809765 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B53"><mixed-citation>Huddleston,&amp;nbsp;R. (1984). Introduction to the Grammar of English, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B54"><mixed-citation>Hulstijn,&amp;nbsp;J.&amp;nbsp;H., de&amp;nbsp;Graaff,&amp;nbsp;R. (1994). Under what conditions does explicit knowledge of a second language facilitate the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A research proposal, AILA review, 11. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B55"><mixed-citation>Hunt,&amp;nbsp;K.&amp;nbsp;W. (1965). Grammatical structures written at three grade levels, NCTE Research Report No. 3, National Council of Teachers of English, Champaign, Ill., USA. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B56"><mixed-citation>Joseph,&amp;nbsp;J.&amp;nbsp;E. (2021). Why does language complexity resist measurement?, Frontiers In Communication [Online], available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcomm.2021.624855/full (accessed 27.07.2024) (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B57"><mixed-citation>Karlsson,&amp;nbsp;F. (2009). Origin and maintenance of clausal embedding complexity, in Sampson,&amp;nbsp;G., Gil,&amp;nbsp;D. and Trudgill,&amp;nbsp;P. (eds.), Language Complexity as an Evolving Variable, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 192&amp;ndash;202. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199545216.003.0013 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B58"><mixed-citation>Kerswill,&amp;nbsp;P., Williams,&amp;nbsp;A. (2002). &amp;ldquo;Salience&amp;rdquo; as an explanatory factor in language change: evidence from dialect levelling in urban England, Contributions to the Sociology of Language, 86, 81&amp;ndash;110. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110892598.81 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B59"><mixed-citation>Kilani-Schoch,&amp;nbsp;M., Sanchez Miret,&amp;nbsp;F. and Dressler,&amp;nbsp;W.&amp;nbsp;U. (2011). Towards naturalness scales of pragmatic complexity, Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 47&amp;nbsp;(2), 237&amp;ndash;263. https://doi.org/10.2478/psicl-2011-0016 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B60"><mixed-citation>Kim,&amp;nbsp;Y. (2009). The effects of task complexity on learner-learner interaction, System, 37&amp;nbsp;(2), 254&amp;ndash;268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.02.003 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B61"><mixed-citation>Kintsch,&amp;nbsp;W. (1974). The representation of meaning in memory, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B62"><mixed-citation>Kintsch,&amp;nbsp;W., Keenan,&amp;nbsp;J. (1973). Reading rate and retention as a function of the number of propositions in the base structure of sentences, Cognitive Psychology, 5, 257&amp;ndash;274. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B63"><mixed-citation>Kitson,&amp;nbsp;H.&amp;nbsp;D. (1921). The Mind of the Buyer, Macmillan, New York. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B64"><mixed-citation>Klare,&amp;nbsp;G.&amp;nbsp;R. (1963). The Measurement of Readability, University of Iowa Press, Ames, IA. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B65"><mixed-citation>Klare,&amp;nbsp;G.&amp;nbsp;R. (1974-1975). Assessing readability, Reading Research Quarterly, 10&amp;nbsp;(1), 62&amp;ndash;102. https://doi.org/10.2307/747086 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B66"><mixed-citation>Klein,&amp;nbsp;E.&amp;nbsp;C., Stoyneshka,&amp;nbsp;I., Adams,&amp;nbsp;K., Rose,&amp;nbsp;T., Pugach,&amp;nbsp;Y. and Solt,&amp;nbsp;S. (2004). Past tense affixation in L2 English: The effects of lexical aspect and perceptual salience, in Brugos,&amp;nbsp;A., Micciulla,&amp;nbsp;L. and Smith,&amp;nbsp;C. (eds.), Boston University Conference on Language Acquisition, 28, Online Proceedings Supplement [Online], available at: http://www.bu.edu/bucld/proceedings/supplement/vol28/ (accessed 27.07.2024) (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B67"><mixed-citation>Kortmann,&amp;nbsp;B., Szmrecsanyi,&amp;nbsp;B. (eds.) (2015). Linguistic complexity: Second language acquisition, indigenization, contact, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany. (In English) https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110229226.6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B68"><mixed-citation>Krashen,&amp;nbsp;S. (1994). The input hypothesis and its rivals, in Ellis, N. (ed), Implicit and explicit learning of languages, Academic Press, London, UK, 45&amp;ndash;77. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B69"><mixed-citation>Kuiken,&amp;nbsp;F., Vedder,&amp;nbsp;I. (2008). Cognitive task complexity and written output in Italian and French as a foreign language, Journal of Second Language Writing, 17&amp;nbsp;(1), 48&amp;ndash;60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.08.003 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B70"><mixed-citation>Kusters,&amp;nbsp;W. (2003). Linguistic Complexity, the Influence of Social Change on Verbal Inflection, Ph.D. Thesis,&amp;nbsp;University of Leiden, LOT, Utrecht, Netherlands. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B71"><mixed-citation>Kusters,&amp;nbsp;W. (2008). Complexity in linguistic theory, language learning and language change, in Miestamo,&amp;nbsp;M., Sinnem&amp;auml;ki,&amp;nbsp;K. and Karlsson,&amp;nbsp;F. (eds.), Language Complexity: Typology, Contact, Change, John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, Netherlands/USA, 3&amp;ndash;22. https://doi.org/10.1524/stuf.2009.0014 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B72"><mixed-citation>Lahmann,&amp;nbsp;C., Steinkrauss,&amp;nbsp;R. and Schmid,&amp;nbsp;M.&amp;nbsp;S. (2019). Measuring linguistic complexity in long-term L2 speakers of English and L1 attriters of German, International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 29&amp;nbsp;(2), 173&amp;ndash;191. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12259 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B73"><mixed-citation>Larsen-Freeman,&amp;nbsp;D., Strom,&amp;nbsp;V. (1977). The construction of a second language acquisition index of development, Language Learning, 27, 123&amp;ndash;134. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B74"><mixed-citation>Lewerenz, A. S. (1935). A vocabulary grade placement formula, Journal of experimental education, 3, 236. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B75"><mixed-citation>Li,&amp;nbsp;M. Vit&amp;aacute;nyi,&amp;nbsp;P. (1997). An introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and its applications. Texts in Computer Science, Springer, New York, USA. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B76"><mixed-citation>Lintunen,&amp;nbsp;P., M&amp;auml;kil&amp;auml;,&amp;nbsp;M. (2014). Measuring syntactic complexity in spoken and written learner language: comparing the incomparable?, Research in Language, 12&amp;nbsp;(4), 377&amp;ndash;399. https://doi.org/10.1515/rela-2015-0005 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B77"><mixed-citation>Lively, B. A., Pressey, S. L. (1923). A method for measuring the &amp;#39;vocabulary burden&amp;#39; of textbooks, Educational administration and supervision, 9, 389&amp;ndash;398. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B78"><mixed-citation>Loban,&amp;nbsp;W. (1976). Language development: Kindergarten through grade twelve. (Research Report No. 18). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B79"><mixed-citation>Lu,&amp;nbsp;X. (2010). Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15 (4): 474&amp;ndash;496. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.15.4.02lu (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B80"><mixed-citation>McWhorter,&amp;nbsp;J. (2001). The world&amp;rsquo;s simplest grammars are creole grammars, Linguistic Typology, 6, 125&amp;ndash;166. (In English) https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195166699.003.0002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B81"><mixed-citation>Miestamo,&amp;nbsp;M. (2006). On the feasibility of complexity metrics, in Kerge,&amp;nbsp;K. and Sepper,&amp;nbsp;M.-M. (eds.), Finest Linguistics. Proceedings of the Annual Finnish and Estonian Conference of Linguistics, TL&amp;Uuml;, Tallin, Estonia, 11&amp;ndash;26. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B82"><mixed-citation>Miestamo,&amp;nbsp;M. (2008). Grammatical complexity in a cross-linguistic perspective, in Miestamo,&amp;nbsp;M., Sinnem&amp;auml;ki,&amp;nbsp;K. and Karlsson,&amp;nbsp;F. (eds.), Language Complexity: Typology, Contact, Change, John Benjamins, Amsterdam/ Philadelphia, Netherlands/USA, 23&amp;ndash;41. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.94.04mie (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B83"><mixed-citation>Morales,&amp;nbsp;M., Lee,&amp;nbsp;J.&amp;nbsp;S. (2015). Stories of assessment: Spanish&amp;ndash;English bilingual children&amp;#39;s agency and interactional competence in oral language assessments, Linguistics and Education, 29, 32&amp;ndash;45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2014.10.008 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B84"><mixed-citation>Nelson,&amp;nbsp;J., Perfetti,&amp;nbsp;C., Liben,&amp;nbsp;D., Liben,&amp;nbsp;M. (2012). Measures of Text Difficulty: Testing Their Predictive Value for Grade Levels and Student Performance, New York, Student Achievement Partners. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B85"><mixed-citation>Nichols,&amp;nbsp;J. (2009). Linguistic complexity: a comprehensive definition and survey, in Sampson,&amp;nbsp;G., Gil,&amp;nbsp;D. and Trudgill,&amp;nbsp;P. (eds.), Language Complexity as an Evolving Variable, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 64&amp;ndash;79. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199545216.003.0008 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B86"><mixed-citation>Norris,&amp;nbsp;J.&amp;nbsp;M., Ortega,&amp;nbsp;L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: a research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis, Language Learning, 50&amp;nbsp;(3), 417&amp;ndash;528. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00136 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B87"><mixed-citation>Norris,&amp;nbsp;J.&amp;nbsp;M., Ortega,&amp;nbsp;L. (2009). Measurement for understanding: An organic approach to investigating complexity, accuracy, and fluency in SLA, Applied Linguistics, 30&amp;nbsp;(4), 555&amp;ndash;578. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp044 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B88"><mixed-citation>Ortega,&amp;nbsp;L. (2003). Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing, Applied Linguistics, 24, 492&amp;ndash;518. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.4.492 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B89"><mixed-citation>Ortega,&amp;nbsp;L. (2012). Interlanguage complexity: A construct in search of theoretical renewal, in Kortmann, B. and B. Szmrecsanyi (eds.), Linguistic complexity: Second language acquisition, indigenization, contact, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany, 127&amp;ndash;155. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110229226.127 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B90"><mixed-citation>Pallotti,&amp;nbsp;G. (2009). CAF: Defining, redefining and differentiating constructs, Applied Linguistics, 30 (4), 590&amp;ndash;601. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp045 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B91"><mixed-citation>Pallotti,&amp;nbsp;G. (2015). A simple view of linguistic complexity, Second Language Research, 31&amp;nbsp;(1), 117&amp;ndash;134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658314536435 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B92"><mixed-citation>Patty. W. W., Painter, W. I. (1931). A technique for measuring the vocabulary burden of textbooks, Journal of educational research, 24, 127&amp;ndash;134. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B93"><mixed-citation>Purpura,&amp;nbsp;J. (2004). Assessing Grammar, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511733086 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B94"><mixed-citation>Rundell,&amp;nbsp;M. (2007). Macmillan English Dictionary for Advanced Learners, Macmillan Publishers Ltd, London, UK. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B95"><mixed-citation>Shannon,&amp;nbsp;C., (1948). A Mathematical Theory of Communication, Bell System Technical Journal, 27 (3): 379&amp;ndash;423. DOI: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B96"><mixed-citation>Sherman,&amp;nbsp;L.&amp;nbsp;A. (1893). Analytics of Literature: A Manual for the Objective Study of English Prose and Poetry. Athenaeum Press, Ginn, Germany. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B97"><mixed-citation>Shosted,&amp;nbsp;R.&amp;nbsp;K. (2006). Correlating complexity: A typological approach, Linguistic Typology, 10, 1&amp;ndash;40. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty.2006.001 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B98"><mixed-citation>Sinnem&amp;auml;ki,&amp;nbsp;K. (2011). Language universals and linguistic complexity: three case studies in core argument marking. PhD thesis, University of Helsinki. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B99"><mixed-citation>Slik,&amp;nbsp;F.&amp;nbsp;van&amp;nbsp;der, Hout,&amp;nbsp;R.&amp;nbsp;van and Schepens,&amp;nbsp;J. (2019). The role of morphological complexity in predicting the learnability of an additional language. The case of La (additional language) Dutch, Second Language Research, 35&amp;nbsp;(1), 47&amp;ndash;70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658317691322 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B100"><mixed-citation>Skehan,&amp;nbsp;P. (1996). Second language acquisition and task-based instruction, in Willis, J. and D. Willis (eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching, Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 17&amp;ndash;30. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B101"><mixed-citation>Skehan,&amp;nbsp;P. (2003). Task-based instruction. Language Teaching, 36, 1&amp;ndash;14. https://doi.org/10.1017/s026144480200188x (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B102"><mixed-citation>Spada,&amp;nbsp;N., Tomita,&amp;nbsp;Y. (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis, Language Learning, 60&amp;nbsp;(2), 1&amp;ndash;46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00562.x (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B103"><mixed-citation>Stubbs,&amp;nbsp;M. (1996). Text and Corpus Analysis: Corpus-Assisted Studies of Language and Culture, Blackwell, Oxford, UK. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B104"><mixed-citation>Thorndike,&amp;nbsp;E. (1934). Improving the ability to read, Teachers college record, 36, 1&amp;ndash;19, 123&amp;ndash;44, 229&amp;ndash;41. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B105"><mixed-citation>Trudgill,&amp;nbsp;P. (2001). Contact and simplification: historical baggage and directionality in linguistic change, Linguistic Typology, 5&amp;nbsp;(2/3), 371&amp;ndash;374. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B106"><mixed-citation>Trudgill,&amp;nbsp;P. (2004) Linguistic and Social Typology: The Austronesian migrations and phoneme inventories, Linguistic Typology, 8, 305&amp;ndash;320. https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2004.8.3.305 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B107"><mixed-citation>Turner,&amp;nbsp;A., Greene,&amp;nbsp;E. (1977). The Construction and Use of a Propositional Text Base, Technical Report 63, University of Colorado, Institute for the Study of Intellectual Behavior, Boulder, CO.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B108"><mixed-citation>Unsworth,&amp;nbsp;S. (2008). Comparing child L2 development with adult L2 development: How to measure L2 proficiency, in Gavruseva,&amp;nbsp;E., Haznedar,&amp;nbsp;B. (eds.). Current trends in child second language acquisition, John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 301&amp;ndash;336. https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.46.15uns (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B109"><mixed-citation>Van&amp;nbsp;Lommel,&amp;nbsp;S., Laenen,&amp;nbsp;A. and d&amp;rsquo;Ydewalle,&amp;nbsp;G. (2006). Foreign-grammar acquisition while watching subtitled television programmes, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 243&amp;ndash;258. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905x38946 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B110"><mixed-citation>Van&amp;nbsp;Valin,&amp;nbsp;R. and La&amp;nbsp;Polla,&amp;nbsp;R. (1997). Syntax, Structure, Meaning and Function, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B111"><mixed-citation>Verspoor,&amp;nbsp;M., Lowie,&amp;nbsp;W., Chan,&amp;nbsp;H.&amp;nbsp;P. and Vahtrick,&amp;nbsp;L. (2017). Linguistic complexity in second language development: variability and variation at advanced stages, Recherches en didactique des langues et des cultures, 14&amp;nbsp;(1), 1&amp;ndash;28. https://doi.org/10.4000/rdlc.1450 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B112"><mixed-citation>Wang,&amp;nbsp;Y., Berwick,&amp;nbsp;R. and Luo,&amp;nbsp;X. (2012). The cognitive complexity of texts and its formal measurement in cognitive linguistics, Journal of Advanced Mathematics and Applications, 1, 275&amp;ndash;286. https://doi.org/10.1166/jama.2012.1022 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B113"><mixed-citation>Wolfe-Quintero,&amp;nbsp;K., Inagaki,&amp;nbsp;S. and Kim,&amp;nbsp;H.-Y. (1998). Second language development in writing: Measures of Fluency, accuracy, and</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B114"><mixed-citation>complexity. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching &amp;amp; Curriculum Center. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B115"><mixed-citation>Young,&amp;nbsp;R., He,&amp;nbsp;A. W. (1998). Talking and Testing: Discourse Approaches to the Assessment of Oral Proficiency (Vol. 14), John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam, Netherlands. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B116"><mixed-citation>Zaki,&amp;nbsp;H., Ellis,&amp;nbsp;R. (1999). Learning Vocabulary through Interacting with a Written Text, in Ellis,&amp;nbsp;R. (ed), Learning a Second Language through Interaction, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 153&amp;ndash;169. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B117"><mixed-citation>Zipf,&amp;nbsp;G.&amp;nbsp;K. (1935). The psycho-biology of language, Mifflin, Houghton, US. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>