<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2313-8912</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2313-8912</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2313-8912-2016-2-2-11-15</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">523</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>COMPARATIVE LINGUISTICS</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>THE PHONOLOGICAL HERITAGE OF THE SCIENTISTS OF THE XX CENTURY: A LINGUISTIC AND HISTORIOGRAPHICAL REVIEW</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>THE PHONOLOGICAL HERITAGE OF THE SCIENTISTS OF THE XX CENTURY: A LINGUISTIC AND HISTORIOGRAPHICAL REVIEW</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Orel</surname><given-names>Anna S.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Orel</surname><given-names>Anna S.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Kholodova</surname><given-names>Nataliya Viktorovna</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kholodova</surname><given-names>Nataliya Viktorovna</given-names></name></name-alternatives></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution>Donbas State Teachers’ Training University, Ukraine</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>2</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/linguistics/2016/2/12-16.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The authors thoroughly investigate the development of the diachronic phonology conceptual framework. The formation of phoneme concept as well as the evolution of the term &amp;ldquo;phoneme&amp;rdquo; itself falls within the scope of our research. A great attention is paid to the linguistic-historiographic analysis of the works of the Moscow, Prague and Saint Petersburg phonological schools&amp;rsquo; representatives, which were dedicated to the problem of the language phonemic system. The fundamental statements of the XX century&amp;rsquo;s scientists on the necessary consideration of the phoneme functional load in the language system are defined. In view of the functional load of each phoneme in the system we study the uprising of the hyperphoneme notion, namely the development of its term base in the works of M. V. Panov, distinguishing the hyperphoneme from the archiphoneme of Prague linguists. The contributions made by the linguists of the XX century in the practical study of phonological systems of the subgroup of Eastern-Slavic languages are reconsidered in the article.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The authors thoroughly investigate the development of the diachronic phonology conceptual framework. The formation of phoneme concept as well as the evolution of the term &amp;ldquo;phoneme&amp;rdquo; itself falls within the scope of our research. A great attention is paid to the linguistic-historiographic analysis of the works of the Moscow, Prague and Saint Petersburg phonological schools&amp;rsquo; representatives, which were dedicated to the problem of the language phonemic system. The fundamental statements of the XX century&amp;rsquo;s scientists on the necessary consideration of the phoneme functional load in the language system are defined. In view of the functional load of each phoneme in the system we study the uprising of the hyperphoneme notion, namely the development of its term base in the works of M. V. Panov, distinguishing the hyperphoneme from the archiphoneme of Prague linguists. The contributions made by the linguists of the XX century in the practical study of phonological systems of the subgroup of Eastern-Slavic languages are reconsidered in the article.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>phonology</kwd><kwd>phonological school</kwd><kwd>synchrony</kwd><kwd>diachrony</kwd><kwd>phoneme</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>phonology</kwd><kwd>phonological school</kwd><kwd>synchrony</kwd><kwd>diachrony</kwd><kwd>phoneme</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>1.&amp;nbsp;Avanesov&amp;nbsp;R.&amp;nbsp;I., Panov&amp;nbsp;M.&amp;nbsp;V. Aleksandr Aleksandrovich Reformatskiy // Phonetic. Phonology. Grammatik: on the 70th anniversary of Reformatskiy&amp;nbsp;A.&amp;nbsp;A. Moscow: Nauka, 1971. Pp. 5-17.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>2.&amp;nbsp;Akhmanova&amp;nbsp;O.&amp;nbsp;S. Dictionary of Linguistic Terms. Moscow: Sov. enciklopediya, 1966. 608 s</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>3. Ahmanova&amp;nbsp;O.&amp;nbsp;S. Phonology. Moscow, 1954. 204 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>4.&amp;nbsp;Burmistrovich&amp;nbsp;Yu.&amp;nbsp;Ya. Historical Phonemology of the Consequential Row or of the Chain of Slavic Languages, Connected by &amp;ldquo;Ancestor-descendant&amp;rdquo;, from&amp;nbsp; Proto-Indo-European Language Presented by its Proto-Slavic dialect to Russian. Abakan: Publ. of Khakas State University by N.&amp;nbsp;F.&amp;nbsp;Katanova, 2001, 227 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>5. Zhuravlev&amp;nbsp;V.&amp;nbsp;K. Diachronic Phonology. Moscow: Nauka, 1986. 232&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>6. Zinder&amp;nbsp;L.&amp;nbsp;R. General Phonetics: Textbook. sec. edition, M.: Vysshaya Shkola, 1979, 312 p</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>7.&amp;nbsp;Kuznetsov&amp;nbsp;P.&amp;nbsp;S. On General Fundamentals of Phonology // Linguistic Issues. 1959. № 2. pp. 28-35</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>8. On the Correspondence between Synchronic Analysis and Historic Study of Languages. M.: Nauka, 1960, 143 p</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>9.&amp;nbsp;Panov&amp;nbsp;M.&amp;nbsp;V. The Modern Russian Language. Phonetics. Moscow: Nauka, 1979. 256 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>10.&amp;nbsp;Postovalova&amp;nbsp;V.&amp;nbsp;I. The Foundations of Historical Phonology: Experience of Logical and Methodological Analysis. Moscow: Nauka, 1978. 203&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>11. Protogenov&amp;nbsp;S.&amp;nbsp;V. The History of the Phoneme Doctrine. Tashkent: Izd-vo &amp;ldquo;Fan&amp;rdquo;, 1970. 96 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>12.&amp;nbsp;Reformatskiy&amp;nbsp;A.&amp;nbsp;A. From the History of Russian Phonology. Feature article. Moscow: Nauka, 1970. pp. 9-120.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>13.&amp;nbsp;Scherba&amp;nbsp;L.&amp;nbsp;V. Language System and Speech Activity. Leningrad: Nauka, 1970. 170 p.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>