<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2313-8912</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2313-8912</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2313-8912-2016-2-2-16-21</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">525</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>THEORY OF LANGUAGE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>CATEGORIES, PREDICABILIA AND TOPS OF ARISTOTLE AS A BASIS OF THE MODERN SYSTEM OF COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE UNITS</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>CATEGORIES, PREDICABILIA AND TOPS OF ARISTOTLE AS A BASIS OF THE MODERN SYSTEM OF COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE UNITS</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Sadikova</surname><given-names>Valentina Alekseeva</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Sadikova</surname><given-names>Valentina Alekseeva</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>vsadnik46@mail.ru</email></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>2</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/linguistics/2016/2/17-22.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Tops, Aristotle&amp;#39;s categories and predikabilia are considered in unity and cooperation. The author focuses on those historical moments of the formation and ordering of tops that let you understand them not as &amp;quot;common places,&amp;quot; but as structurally-semantic models engendering communicative sense. The first reason for this is the position of Aristotle, the founder of the tops, which juxtaposed topica with dialectics, understood as the art of dialogue, communication. The author examines the views on topica of Cicero and Quintilian; identifies the cause of negative attitudes towards the &amp;quot;common places&amp;quot; of Descartes and others. Special attention is paid to NAME. The author traces its historical destiny. It is suggested that the proposed understanding of top in the article as a structural-semantic model is the prototype of the modern notion of concept. The author offers a modern synthetic system (tops), based on the tops, predicabilia and Aristotle&amp;#39;s categories, which is a database of understanding of people in the course of communication, as it organically links the immediate being, language-speech, and thinking-consciousness of people in every moment of communication.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Tops, Aristotle&amp;#39;s categories and predikabilia are considered in unity and cooperation. The author focuses on those historical moments of the formation and ordering of tops that let you understand them not as &amp;quot;common places,&amp;quot; but as structurally-semantic models engendering communicative sense. The first reason for this is the position of Aristotle, the founder of the tops, which juxtaposed topica with dialectics, understood as the art of dialogue, communication. The author examines the views on topica of Cicero and Quintilian; identifies the cause of negative attitudes towards the &amp;quot;common places&amp;quot; of Descartes and others. Special attention is paid to NAME. The author traces its historical destiny. It is suggested that the proposed understanding of top in the article as a structural-semantic model is the prototype of the modern notion of concept. The author offers a modern synthetic system (tops), based on the tops, predicabilia and Aristotle&amp;#39;s categories, which is a database of understanding of people in the course of communication, as it organically links the immediate being, language-speech, and thinking-consciousness of people in every moment of communication.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>categories</kwd><kwd>predicabilia</kwd><kwd>topica</kwd><kwd>dialectic</kwd><kwd>structural-semantic models</kwd><kwd>communication</kwd><kwd>situation</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>categories</kwd><kwd>predicabilia</kwd><kwd>topica</kwd><kwd>dialectic</kwd><kwd>structural-semantic models</kwd><kwd>communication</kwd><kwd>situation</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>1. Annushkin V.I. Rhetoric: Introductory Course: Textbook. M.: Flinta: Nauka. 2006. 296p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>2. Aleksandrov D.N. Russian Rhetoric or Oratory. M.: YuNITI-DANA. 2003. 351p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>3. Aristotel. Categories / Per. A.V. Kubitskogo. M.: Gos. sots.-ekonom. izd.. 1939. 84 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>4. Aristotel. Works in 4 volumes. Vol. 2. M.: Mysl. 1978. 687p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>5. Arno A.. Nikol P. Logic, or the Art of Thinking.&amp;nbsp; M.: Nauka. 1991. 413p.&amp;nbsp;</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>6. Assuirova L.V. Toposy as Rhetorical Categories and Structural-semantic Models Engendering Sayings: dis&amp;hellip; d-ra. pedag. nauk. M.. 2003. 550p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>7. Bulgakova. A.A. Topica in a Literary Process: / A.A. Bulgakova. &amp;ndash; Grodno : GrGU. 2008. 107 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>8. Varzonin Yu.N. Cognitive-communicative model of rhetoric : dis&amp;hellip; d-ra. filol. nauk. Tver: TvGU. 2001. 268 p.&amp;nbsp;</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>9. Zalevskaya A.A. Dynamics of Interdisciplinary Approaches to Knowledge and Some Tasks of the Psycholinguistic Research // Voprosy psikholingvistiki. 2007. № 5. Pp.4-12.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>10. Volkov A.A. Basics of Rhetoric: a Textbook for High Schools. M.: Akademicheskiy proyekt. 2003. 304 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>11. Dekart R. A Conversation with BURMAN // Soch. v 2-kh tt. T.2. M.: Mysl. 1994. Pp. 447-488.&amp;nbsp;</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>12. Kvintilian M.F. Twelve Books of Rhetorical Instruction. In 2 parts. /Per. A. Nikolskogo. Chast 1. SPb. 1834.&amp;nbsp;</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>13. Lomonosov M. V. A Brief Guide to the Oratory // Poln. sobr. soch. T.7. Trudy po filologii 1739-1758 gg. M.-L.: Izd. AN SSSR. 1952. Pp. 89-378.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>14. Mikhalskaya A.K. Basics of Rhetoric: Thought and Word. M.: Prosveshcheniye. 1996. 416 p.&amp;nbsp;</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>15. Redkin P.G. Review of the Substantive Content of the Philosophical Writings of Aristotle. The End of Logic: Topica.&amp;nbsp; // P.G. Redkin. Iz lektsiy po istorii filosofii prava v svyazi s istoriyey filosofii voobshche. SPb.: Tipografiya M.M. Stasyulevicha. 1891. T. 6. P.1-43.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>16. Rozhdestvenskiy Yu.V. Principles of Modern Rhetoric. M.: Flinta: Nauka. 2005. 176 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>17. Sadikova V.A. Top &amp;quot;Name&amp;quot; // Mir lingvistiki i kommunikatsii: elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal. № 2 (19). 2010. Identifikatsionnyy nomer 0421000038\0012. URL: http://tverlingua.ru (0.5 p.l.).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>18. Stepanov Yu.S. Method and Language. To Contemporary Philosophy of Language. M.: Yazyki russkoy kultury. 1998. 784 p.&amp;nbsp;</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>19. Tsitseron M.T. Topica&amp;nbsp; // Mark Tulliy Tsitseron. Izbrannyye proizvedeniya. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura. 1975. P. 56-81.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>