<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2313-8912</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2313-8912</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2313-8912-2016-2-2-50-55</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">532</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>THEORY OF LANGUAGE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>DISCOURSE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SERMON “THE FACT THAT THE MOST HOLY MOTHER OF GOD WAS HEBREW”  BY SAINT LUKA    (V.F.VOYNO-YASENETSKY)</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>DISCOURSE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SERMON “THE FACT THAT THE MOST HOLY MOTHER OF GOD WAS HEBREW”  BY SAINT LUKA    (V.F.VOYNO-YASENETSKY)</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Chikovani</surname><given-names>Tatiana Владимировна</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Chikovani</surname><given-names>Tatiana</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>tatiana_chykovani@yahoo.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution>Vernadsky Crimean Federal University</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>2</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/linguistics/2016/2/51-56.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The article discusses different approaches of domestic linguists to the concept of an Orthodox sermon. We considered the general concept of a sermon as one of the forms of a speech genre in religious discourse. We attempted to identify the discourse characteristics of the sermon &amp;ldquo;The Fact that the Most Holy Mother of God Was Hebrew &amp;ldquo;by Saint Luka, Archbishop of Simferopol and Crimea. We conducted a concept analysis of the sermon, identified some characteristic discourse tendencies and stylistic devices typical of Orthodox discourse, revealed such cognitive dominants, expressing emotional state of the preacher, as &amp;quot;surprise&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;outrage&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;love&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;hope&amp;quot;, each of which is represented by specific lexis and stylistic devices.&amp;quot; Based on the sermon analysis, we compiled a list of 11 super-frequent lexeme-collocates, which make the core of the sermon under consideration: Christ, God, heart, He-Hebrew, the Hebrews, the Most Holy Mother of God, the people, reject, She, She-Hebrew, word.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article discusses different approaches of domestic linguists to the concept of an Orthodox sermon. We considered the general concept of a sermon as one of the forms of a speech genre in religious discourse. We attempted to identify the discourse characteristics of the sermon &amp;ldquo;The Fact that the Most Holy Mother of God Was Hebrew &amp;ldquo;by Saint Luka, Archbishop of Simferopol and Crimea. We conducted a concept analysis of the sermon, identified some characteristic discourse tendencies and stylistic devices typical of Orthodox discourse, revealed such cognitive dominants, expressing emotional state of the preacher, as &amp;quot;surprise&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;outrage&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;love&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;hope&amp;quot;, each of which is represented by specific lexis and stylistic devices.&amp;quot; Based on the sermon analysis, we compiled a list of 11 super-frequent lexeme-collocates, which make the core of the sermon under consideration: Christ, God, heart, He-Hebrew, the Hebrews, the Most Holy Mother of God, the people, reject, She, She-Hebrew, word.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>cognitive dominant</kwd><kwd>conceptual field</kwd><kwd>lexeme</kwd><kwd>linguistic personality</kwd><kwd>Orthodox discourse</kwd><kwd>religious discourse</kwd><kwd>seme</kwd><kwd>sermon</kwd><kwd>speech genre</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>cognitive dominant</kwd><kwd>conceptual field</kwd><kwd>lexeme</kwd><kwd>linguistic personality</kwd><kwd>Orthodox discourse</kwd><kwd>religious discourse</kwd><kwd>seme</kwd><kwd>sermon</kwd><kwd>speech genre</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>1. Bobyreva Y.V. Religious Discourse: Values, Genres, Strategies. (On the basis of the Orthodox Faith ) : Abstract. Volgograd, 2007. 45p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>2. Bugaeva&amp;nbsp; I.V.&amp;nbsp; About&amp;nbsp; Methodical and Theoretical Bases of Religious Communication Study&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; //&amp;nbsp; Church and the Problems of Modern Communication:&amp;nbsp; Sb.&amp;nbsp; st.&amp;nbsp; Nizniy Novgorod:&amp;nbsp; Nizegorodskaya&amp;nbsp; Duhovnaya&amp;nbsp; Seminariya,&amp;nbsp; 2007. Pp. 39-53.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 3. Zvezdin D.A. Orthodox Sermon as a Genre of Church and Religious Style of Modern Russian Literary Language (on the example of the texts of the second half of the XX century ) : Abstract. diss . ... K. Philology. n . Chelyabinsk , 2012. 20 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 4. Krestiankin I. To the Unknown Daze. Useful and CONTEMPLATIVE WOrds. Saint-Uspensky Pskov-Cave Monastery , 2009. 175 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>&amp;nbsp; 5. Karasik V.I.&amp;nbsp; Language circle:&amp;nbsp; personality, concepts, discourse. Volgograd: Peremena, 2002.&amp;nbsp; 477 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 6. Malafeev A.Y. Modern Orthodox Sermon and Public Lecture: Vocabulary and Pragmatics // Bulletin of the Surgut State Pedagogical University . 2013. № 5 (26). p. 37-42.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7. Ogneva E.A. Cognitive Modeling of the Literary Text Conceptual Field. 2nd ed .&amp;nbsp; M .: Editus , 2013. 282 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 8. Ozhegov S.I. Russian Dictionary. Ed. Corr. By N.Yu. Shvedovoy USSR Academy of Sciences . 18th stereotype. M .: Rus.yaz , 1986.797 p .</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 9. Saint Luka (Voyno-Yasenetsky). Science and Religion. Simferopol: OOO &amp;ldquo;Forma&amp;rdquo;, 2013. 160 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 10. Saint Luka (Voyno-Yasenetsky). Hurry up to Follow Christ. Simferopol Sermons. &amp;nbsp;(1946-1948). Kramatorsk: Tirazh-51, 2009. 240p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 11. Saint Luka (Voyno-Yasenetsky). I Fell in Love with Suffering. Autobiography. Approved by the Publishing Council of the Russian Orthodox Church. 222 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 12. Shahbazyan M.A. Church Preaching as a Paradigm of the Russian Religious and Philosophical Journalism // Herald of Adygeya State University. Series 2. Philology and Art History. 2011. № 1. Pp. 55-59 .</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 13. Shepit&amp;rsquo;ko S.V., Smirnova M.S. Linguistic Personality in Religious Discourse // Science and Education a New Dimension: Philology. 2013. № 13. P. 198-201.&amp;nbsp;</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>&amp;nbsp;</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Electronic Resources</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;14. Mironova N. Religious Discourse, the Religious Sociolect and Religious Identity &amp;ndash; the Problem of Definition . URL: http: // www. mediascope.ru/node/756 (date of access:&amp;nbsp; November 5, 2015).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;15. Petrushko I.A. Modeling of Linguistic Personality as a Basis for the Development of Educational Training Programs of an Orthodox Preacher http://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/ (date of access:&amp;nbsp; November 20, 2015).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;16. Yaskevich O.V. Orthodox Preaching in the Paradigm of the Modern Russian Literary Language. URL: http://elib.bsu.by/handle/ (date of access: February 3, 2016).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>&amp;nbsp;</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>