<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2313-8912</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2313-8912</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2313-8912-2015-1-4-61-66</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">590</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>THEORY OF LANGUAGE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>COMMUNICATIVE AND COGNITIVE FEATURES OF ART DISCOURSE AND SCIENCE OF LANGUAGE</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>COMMUNICATIVE AND COGNITIVE FEATURES OF ART DISCOURSE AND SCIENCE OF LANGUAGE</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Sedykh</surname><given-names>Arkadiy P.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Sedykh</surname><given-names>Arkadiy P.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>sedykh@bsu.edu.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Kugan</surname><given-names>Ekaterina I.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kugan</surname><given-names>Ekaterina I.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>kat.kug@rambler.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution>Belgorod State National Research University, Russia</institution></aff><aff id="aff2"><institution>Shukhov Belgorod State Technological University, Russia</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>1</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/linguistics/2015/4/ling12.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The paper describes the communicative and cognitive signs of artistic discourse and its interpretations in linguistics. Different interpretations of discourse in modern linguistic research are considered. The author&amp;#39;s literary discourse is described in terms of the concept, with respect to positions of researcher itself. World view of the writer is often manifested in the framework of the verbalization of a number of concepts that are organically included in idiosphere of an individual author&amp;rsquo;s works. Reconstructing a hypothetical model generalizing linguistic identity of the author is based on the description and analysis of linguistic material use as the basis for the interpretation of the semiotic discourse space. Individual concept sphere and author&amp;rsquo;s thesaurus could be considered as an epistemological base of language personality of the writer. It is conjectured that the artistic discourse serves to highlight the relevant objects and essential features of language personality of the writer. Language personality of the writer is treated as a model element of national linguocultural community.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The paper describes the communicative and cognitive signs of artistic discourse and its interpretations in linguistics. Different interpretations of discourse in modern linguistic research are considered. The author&amp;#39;s literary discourse is described in terms of the concept, with respect to positions of researcher itself. World view of the writer is often manifested in the framework of the verbalization of a number of concepts that are organically included in idiosphere of an individual author&amp;rsquo;s works. Reconstructing a hypothetical model generalizing linguistic identity of the author is based on the description and analysis of linguistic material use as the basis for the interpretation of the semiotic discourse space. Individual concept sphere and author&amp;rsquo;s thesaurus could be considered as an epistemological base of language personality of the writer. It is conjectured that the artistic discourse serves to highlight the relevant objects and essential features of language personality of the writer. Language personality of the writer is treated as a model element of national linguocultural community.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>linguistic culture</kwd><kwd>discourse</kwd><kwd>cognition</kwd><kwd>communication</kwd><kwd>concept</kwd><kwd>idiosphere</kwd><kwd>linguistic identity</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>linguistic culture</kwd><kwd>discourse</kwd><kwd>cognition</kwd><kwd>communication</kwd><kwd>concept</kwd><kwd>idiosphere</kwd><kwd>linguistic identity</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Arutyunova N.D. Discourse // Linguistichesky encyclopedichesky slovar. М.: Sov. Encyclopedia, 1990. P. 136&amp;ndash;137.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Benveniste E. Linguistique g&amp;eacute;n&amp;eacute;rale. &amp;ndash; 3-е izd. М.: Editorial URSS, 2009. 448&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Dake van T.A., Kinch V. Strategies for understanding the coherent text // Novoye v zarubejnoy linguistike. М.: Progress, 1988. Vyp. 23. P. 153&amp;ndash;212.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Dake van T.A. Language. Cognition. Communication. М.: Progress, 1989. 312&amp;nbsp;p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Demyankov V.Z. The system of morphological interpretation of the text // Seminar proyecta &amp;laquo;Dialog&amp;raquo;. Taru: TGU, 1982. P. 23&amp;ndash;26.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Demyankov V.Z. Text and discourse as terms and words of ordinary language // IV Mezhdunarodnaya nauchnaya konferentsia &amp;laquo;Language, culture, society&amp;raquo;. Moscow, 27-30 September 2007: Plenary reports. М.: Moskovsky institute inostrannykh yazykov; Russian Academy of Linguistic Sciences; Institute of Linguistics RAN; Scientific journal &amp;quot;Issues of philology&amp;quot;, 2007. P. 86-95.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Карасик, В.И. О типах дискурса // Языковая личность: институциональный и персональный дискурс: сб. науч. тр. Волгоград: Перемена, 2000. С. 5&amp;ndash;20.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Karassik V.I. Linguistic Circle: Personality, Concepts, Discourse: monographia. &amp;ndash; 2-е izd. М.: Gnozis, 2004. 390 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Curry H.B. Foundations of mathematical logic. М.: Mir, 1969. 568 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Kirov E.F. The chain of events - the discourse / text - concept // Actual problems of linguistics and intercultural communication. Lingvodidaktichesky aspects of the ICC: scientific materials. session of the Faculty of LiMK VOLGU. &amp;ndash; Volgograd, April 2003: Sat. scientific. Art. Volgograd: Publishing House &amp;laquo;Volgograd&amp;raquo;, 2004. &amp;ndash; Vyp. 2. P. 29&amp;ndash;41.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Kubryakova E.S., Alexandrova O.V. About the contours of a new paradigm of knowledge in linguistics // structure and semantics of the art text: reports of VII Intern. Conf. М., 1999. P. 186&amp;ndash;197.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>P&amp;ecirc;cheux M. Les v&amp;eacute;rit&amp;eacute;s de la Palice (Discourse and Ideology) // Area sense. The French school of discourse analysis. М., 2002.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Revzina O.G. Language and discourse // Vestnik MGU. Series 9. Philology. М., 1999, № 1. С. 33.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Sedykh A.P. Context. Sign. Form. Belgorod: BGU, 1998. 160 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Serio P. How to read texts in France // Area sense. М, 1999. P. 12-54.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Saussure F. Course in General Linguistics // Works on linguistics. М.: Prosveshenye, 1970. 280 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Stepanov Y.S. Alternative world, discourse, facts and principles of causality // Language and science of the late 20th century. M .: RAN, 1996. P. 35&amp;ndash;73.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Stepanov YS Constants: Dictionary of Russian culture. &amp;ndash; 2nd ed., Rev. and additional. М.: Akadem. proyect, 2001. 990 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Foucault M. Archaeology of Knowledge. St. Petersburg: IC &amp;laquo;Humanitarian Academy&amp;raquo;; University Book, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>Habermas J. Involvement of another. Essays on political theory. St. Petersburg, 2001. 380 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>Chomsky N. Syntax structure // New in linguistics. М.: 1962. &amp;ndash; В.&amp;nbsp;II. P.&amp;nbsp;418.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>Charaudeau, P. Langage et discours. P.: Hachette, 1983. 176&amp;nbsp;р.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><mixed-citation>Coquet J.C. S&amp;eacute;miotique litt&amp;eacute;raire. P.: Maine, 1973. 270 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><mixed-citation>Court&amp;eacute;s, J. La grande traque des valeurs textuelles: Quelques principes liminaires pour comprendre la GT // Le fran&amp;ccedil;ais dans le monde. 1985. &amp;ndash; № 192. P. 28&amp;ndash;34.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><mixed-citation>Greimas, A., Court&amp;eacute;s J. S&amp;eacute;miotique. Dictionnaire raisonn&amp;eacute; de la th&amp;eacute;orie du langage. P.: Hachette, 1979. 389 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><mixed-citation>Harris Z.S. Discourse analysis // Lg., 1952. Vol. 28. № 1. P. 1-30. Repr. // The structure of language: Readings in the philosophy of language. Englewood Cliffs (N. J.): Prentice Hall, 1964 (1952). P. 355-383.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>