<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2313-8912</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2313-8912</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413 / 2313-8912-2015-1-3-10-17</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">594</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>THEORY OF LANGUAGE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>SYNERGY OF CULTURALLY MARKED UNITS OF DISCOURSE: ISSUES OF SOCIAL LINGUISTICS</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>SYNERGY OF CULTURALLY MARKED UNITS OF DISCOURSE: ISSUES OF SOCIAL LINGUISTICS</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Ogneva</surname><given-names>Elena A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Ogneva</surname><given-names>Elena A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>ogneva@bsu.edu.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution>Belgorod State National Research University, Russia</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>1</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/linguistics/2015/3/ling2.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The article deals with the results of linguoculturally marked discursive researches. The discourse is studied as a non-linear social-communicative pattern. The author considers some new scientific issues of the culturally marked units&amp;rsquo; modification. The degree of culturally marked units&amp;rsquo; modification with a stable kernel of ethnocultural matrix pattern is identified. The role of linguistic world-image in the process of cultural code forming is further defined. The cultural code is identified as the basis for developing the linguocultural discourse and its synergy. The degree of synergy dynamics of culturally marked units, forming ethnocultural pattern of society, is revealed. The parameters of synergy dynamics of culturally marked units caused by extralinguistic factors are studied. The author introduces some innovative terms into the methodology of linguistic researches. The terms include: situational transformations of the society discursive pattern, permanent transformations of the society discursive pattern, synergy of culturally marked units, discursive synergy of society.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article deals with the results of linguoculturally marked discursive researches. The discourse is studied as a non-linear social-communicative pattern. The author considers some new scientific issues of the culturally marked units&amp;rsquo; modification. The degree of culturally marked units&amp;rsquo; modification with a stable kernel of ethnocultural matrix pattern is identified. The role of linguistic world-image in the process of cultural code forming is further defined. The cultural code is identified as the basis for developing the linguocultural discourse and its synergy. The degree of synergy dynamics of culturally marked units, forming ethnocultural pattern of society, is revealed. The parameters of synergy dynamics of culturally marked units caused by extralinguistic factors are studied. The author introduces some innovative terms into the methodology of linguistic researches. The terms include: situational transformations of the society discursive pattern, permanent transformations of the society discursive pattern, synergy of culturally marked units, discursive synergy of society.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>cultural linguistics</kwd><kwd>social linguistics</kwd><kwd>discourse</kwd><kwd>synergy</kwd><kwd>culturally marked units</kwd><kwd>pattern</kwd><kwd>transformation of the pattern</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>cultural linguistics</kwd><kwd>social linguistics</kwd><kwd>discourse</kwd><kwd>synergy</kwd><kwd>culturally marked units</kwd><kwd>pattern</kwd><kwd>transformation of the pattern</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Alefirenko N.F. The Linguocultural Meaning of the Concept &amp;laquo;Discourse&amp;raquo; in Modern Cognitive Linguistics: Russian Word in International Culture: X Congress МАPRAL. S-Petersburg, 2003. Т. 1. Pp. 9-18.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Alefirenko N.F. Language, Consciousness, Culture: Cognitive-Semiological Synergetics of the Word. Volgograd: VGU, 2006. P. 228.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Alefirenko N.F. Alive Word: Issues of Functional Lexicology. Мoscow. Flinta, Nauka, 2009а. P. 344.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Alefirenko N.F. The Concept of Synergetic Space of Linguoculture: Vestnik MSRU. Russian Philology&amp;raquo;. 2009б. # 3. Pp. 7-12.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Gural S.K. Synergetics and Linguosynergetics: Vestnik Tomsk University. 2007. # 302. Pp. 7-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Drozaschih N.V. Linguosynergetics: the Origins and Perspectives: Vestnik of Tumen University. 2009. # 1. Pp. 227-234.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Karasik V.I. Linguosemiological Modeling of Values: Political Linguistics&amp;nbsp; Yekaterinburg. 2012. Vyp. 1(39). Pp. 43-50.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Karaulov U.N. Linguistic Consciousness as the Process (Theoretical Precondition, of one Experiment): Slovo. Sofia. 2001. Pp. 128-129.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Кubryakova E.S. The First Steps of Cognitivizm: Linguistics, Psychology- Cognitive Science: Issues of Linguistics. 1994. # 4. Pp. 34-47.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Кubryakova E.S. Linguistic Consciousness and the World View: Philology and Culture. Tambov: TGU, 1999. Pp. 13-16.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Losev A.F. Esthetics of Renaissance. Мoscow: Misl, 1998. P. 752.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Маmonova N.V. Linguosynergetic Aspects of Discourse as a Self-organizing System: World. Sentence. Text: Analysis of Lingual Culture: sb. nauch. st. Кrasnodar. 2012. Pp. 99-103.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Molchanov G.G. Synergy as the Basic Type Forming Parameter of Modern Languages and Cultural Innovations: Vestnik MSU. Series 19. Linguistics and Cross-cultural Communications. 2006. # 4. Pp. 9-20.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Ogneva Е.А. Modeling of Ethnocognitive Architectonics of Fictions. Monograph. Germany: LAP LAMBER Academic Publishing. 2011. P. 294.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Ogneva Е.А., Кutsenko А.А Discourse as the Linguocultural Format of Reality: Lexicography and Communication &amp;ndash; 2015. Belgorod: NSU BSU, 2015. Pp. 147-154.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Slovikova E.L., Eltsova M.N. Synergetic Categories of Discourse (on advertisement discourse): Vestnik Perm. 2012. Vyp 2 (18). Pp. 67-73.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Sulimov V.A. Cognitive Description of Language and its Cultural Interpretation: Cognitive Transformation. Philological Science. 2006. # 1. Pp. 40-47.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Croft W., Cruse D.A. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. P. 356.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Geeraerts D. Cognitive Semantics and the History of Philosophical Epistemology: Conceptualizations and Mental Processing in Language. B.; N.Y.: Mouton de Gruyter, 1993. Pp. 53-79.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>Harris R. Signs, Language and Communication: Integrational and Segregational Approaches. L., N.Y.: Routledge, 1996. P. 220.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>Holland D. Quinn N. Cultural Models in Language and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. P. 220.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>Johnson-Laird P.N. Mental Models. Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Cambridge [et al.]: Cambridge University Press, 1983. P. 513.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><mixed-citation>K&amp;ouml;hler R. Synergetic Linguistics: The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Ascher R. E. (Ed.). Oxford Pergamon Press. 1994. Vol.8. Pр. 4454-4455.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><mixed-citation>Lakoff, G. Categories and Cognitive Models: Berkeley Cognitive Science Report. Berkeley: Institute for Human Learning [U. of California], 1984. Рp. 275-304.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><mixed-citation>Ogneva E.A. Cognitive-Discursive Paradigm as the Complex Research Program of Humanities: International Journal оf Applied and Fundamental Research. 2014. # 2. URL: www.science-sd.com/457-24679 (date of access: 07.12.2014)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><mixed-citation>Wildgen W. Basic Principles of Self-organization in Language: Synergetics of Cognition. L.P. Tokyo. Hong Kong: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. 1990. Pp. 415-426.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>