2313-8912Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics2313-8912626THEORY OF LANGUAGETHE COMMUNICATIVE AND PRAGMATIC FUNCTIONS OF RUSSIAN PARTICLES IN THE TEXTTHE COMMUNICATIVE AND PRAGMATIC FUNCTIONS OF RUSSIAN PARTICLES IN THE TEXTNagornyIgor A.NagornyIgor A.nagorny@bsu.edu.ruBelgorod State National Research University, Russia20151200

The article considers the question of Russian particles developing the functional perspective of the text. The author analyzes the communicative and pragmatic functions of particles of different semantic groups in the text, particularly the representation of the particles the point of view of the speaker to the event. In the aspect of functional perspective of the text the author describes different logical-semiotic and modus-dictum particle characteristics.

The article considers the question of Russian particles developing the functional perspective of the text. The author analyzes the communicative and pragmatic functions of particles of different semantic groups in the text, particularly the representation of the particles the point of view of the speaker to the event. In the aspect of functional perspective of the text the author describes different logical-semiotic and modus-dictum particle characteristics.

particlestextfunctionmental operationdictummodusqualificationsspeakeraddresseepoint of viewparticlestextfunctionmental operationdictummodusqualificationsspeakeraddresseepoint of viewСписок литературыGalkina-Fedoryk E.M. Impersonal Sentences in the Russian Language. M.: MGU, 1958. P. 332.Nagornyy I.A. On the Question of the Sign Function Modal Persuasive Particles in the Utterance // Man – Communication – Text. Volume 2. Issue 2. Barnaul: Izdatelstvo AGU, 1998. Pp. 46-48.Nikolaeva T.M. The Functions of Particles in a Statement: Based on the Slavic languages. M.: Nauka, 1985. 169 p.Solnsev V.M. Language as a System-structural Formation. M.: Nauka, 1971. P. 294.Starodumova E.A. Russian Particles. Vladivostok: Izdatelstvo DGU, 1997. P.68.Stepanov J.S. The Language and Method. To the Modern Philosophy of Language. M.: Jazyki russkoj kulury, 1998. P.784.Shmeleva T.V. Semantic Syntax. Krasnoyarsk: Izdatelstvo KGU, 1988. P.54.Cooper D. Presupposition // Janua linguarum. Series minor. 203. The Hague – Paris, Mouton, 1974. 130 p.Fillmore Ch. The Case for Case // Universals in Linguistic Theory. №4.  / Ed. by E.Bach and R.Harms. N.Y. – London – Toronto, 1968. Pp. 1-88. Gardner R. «Presupposition» in Philosophy and Linguistics // Studies in Linguistic Semantics. N.Y., 1971. Pp. 22-42. Katz J.J. A Solution to the Projection Problem for Presupposition // Syntax and Semantics. V.11. N.Y.,1979. Pp. 91-154. Syntax and Semantics. Vol.11. Presupposition / Ed. by Choon-Kyu Oh, David A. Dinneen. N.Y. – San Fr. – London: Academic Press, 1979. P.411.