<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2313-8912</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2313-8912</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2313-8912-2016-4-4-21-27</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">875</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>THEORY OF LANGUAGE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>LINGUISTICALLY RELEVANT CHARACTERISTICS OF TERMINOLOGICAL UNITS</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>LINGUISTICALLY RELEVANT CHARACTERISTICS OF TERMINOLOGICAL UNITS</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Shleyvis</surname><given-names>Povilas Ionovich</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Shleyvis</surname><given-names>Povilas Ionovich</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>alexander.0506@mail.ru</email></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>2</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/linguistics/2016/4/Шлейвис.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;The article considers the main complex of linguistically relevant characteristics inherent in terminological units, regardless of thematic area of their functioning. The author investigates linguistic features of terms through a prism of the accompanying extralinguistic factors. The considerable state-of-the-art review of studying of the term nature and its salient characteristics in ontogenesis is provided. The importance of understanding of terminological units from positions of the cognitive science of terminology is highlighted. The article presents the author&amp;#39;s understanding of the &amp;quot;term&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;terminological system&amp;quot; concepts. As for the main and most relevant linguistic characteristics of terminological units, the author puts forward the following ones: monosemic feature, system accessory, correlation to a certain special concept, limitation of the usage sphere, conventionality and stylistic neutrality, motivation. The nomination feature, sonority, internationality and the modernity of terminological units are also considered by the author, however, they are not positioned as their salient characteristics.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;The article considers the main complex of linguistically relevant characteristics inherent in terminological units, regardless of thematic area of their functioning. The author investigates linguistic features of terms through a prism of the accompanying extralinguistic factors. The considerable state-of-the-art review of studying of the term nature and its salient characteristics in ontogenesis is provided. The importance of understanding of terminological units from positions of the cognitive science of terminology is highlighted. The article presents the author&amp;#39;s understanding of the &amp;quot;term&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;terminological system&amp;quot; concepts. As for the main and most relevant linguistic characteristics of terminological units, the author puts forward the following ones: monosemic feature, system accessory, correlation to a certain special concept, limitation of the usage sphere, conventionality and stylistic neutrality, motivation. The nomination feature, sonority, internationality and the modernity of terminological units are also considered by the author, however, they are not positioned as their salient characteristics.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>term</kwd><kwd>terminological system</kwd><kwd>terminology</kwd><kwd>pragmatics</kwd><kwd>functional approach</kwd><kwd>substantive approach</kwd><kwd>term characterization</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>term</kwd><kwd>terminological system</kwd><kwd>terminology</kwd><kwd>pragmatics</kwd><kwd>functional approach</kwd><kwd>substantive approach</kwd><kwd>term characterization</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Averbukh K.Ya. General theory of the term. Ivanovo, 2004. 252 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Aleksandrovskaya L.V. Semantics of the term as a member of general literary lexis (on the material of English marine terminology): Synopsis of a thesis of PhD in Philology. Moscow, 1973. 230 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Bagiyan A.Yu. Determinologization of English technical terminology in popular scientific discourse: Synopsis of a thesis of PhD in Philology. Pyatigorsk, 2015. 28 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Bagiyan A.Yu. Determinologization as a result of border diffusion between special and general lexis. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2014. № 7-2 (37). Pp. 28-33.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Bagiyan A.Yu. Peculiarities of the process english technical terms determinalogization in popular scientific discourse (quantitative analysis). Gumanitarnye, sotsial&amp;#39;no-ekonomicheskie i obshchestvennye nauki. 2014. № 8. Pp. 313-316.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Bagiyan A.Yu. Peculiarities of the determinologization process in popular scientific discourse. European Social Science Journal. 2014. № 6-3 (45). Pp. 199-206.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Vinogradov V.V. Terminology and norm. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1972. 614 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Vinokur G.O. Grammatical observations in the field of technical terminology. Trudy MIIFLI. T. 5. Moscow, 1939. Pp. 3-54.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Golovanova E.I. Introduction to cognitive terminology: study guide. M.: FLINTA: Nauka, 2011. 224 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Golovin B.N., Kobrin R.Yu. Linguistic basics of the science of terms. M.: Vyssh. shk., 1987. 104 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Grinev-Grinevich S.V. Science of terminology: study guide. M.: Izd. tsentr &amp;laquo;Akademiya&amp;raquo;, 2008. 304 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Danilenko V.P. Russian terminology (Linguistic description experience). M.: Nauka, 1977. 246 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Kandelaki T.L. Semantics and motivation of terms. M.: Nauka, 1977. 167 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Kapanadze L.A. Technical and general lexis correlation. Razvitie leksiki sovremennogo russkogo yazyka. M.: Nauka, 1965. Pp. 86-103.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Kobrin R.Yu., Antonova M.V. Terminological systems and their cognitive models. Ocherki nauchno-tekhnicheskoy leksikografii. St. Peterburg: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta, 2002. Pp. 47-66.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Kuz&amp;#39;min N.P. On the essence of term. Vestnik LGU. 1962. № 20. Vol. 4. Pp. 136-146.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Lotte D.S. Foundations of scientific-technical and other terminologies construction. Aspects of theory and methodology. Moscow, 1961. 160 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Mikhaylenko T.D. Cognitive aspects in the process of field terminology formation (on the example of advertising terminology). Nauchnye trudy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii uchenykh. Moscow-Lugansk, 2006. Pp. 49-58.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Mikhaylenko T.D. Terminology as a basic component of field terminology. Vestnik Rossiyskoy tamozhennoy akademii. 2013. № 3. Pp. 105-110.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>Petrova I.L. On some peculiar conditions of terms functioning. Terminy v yazyke i rechi. Gorky, 1987. Pp. 54-65.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>Rebrushkina I.A., Ariskina O.L. On the diffusion of the notions of motivation and determination of term (on the basis of linguistic terminology). Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. 2012. № 2. Pp. 208-213.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>Reformatskiy A.A. What is term and terminology. Moscow, 1959. 253 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><mixed-citation>Sorokin Yu.A. Lacunas: one more perspective. Lakuny v yazyke i rechi: sb. nauchn. tr. Blagoveshchensk, 2003. Pp. 3-11.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><mixed-citation>Superanskaya A.V., Podol&amp;#39;skaya N.V., Vasil&amp;#39;eva N.V. General terminology. Theoretical aspects. Moscow, 1989. 246 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><mixed-citation>Khayutin A.D. Term, terminology, nomenclature: study guide. Samarkand: SGU, 1972. 130 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><mixed-citation>Shelov S.D. One more time on the &amp;laquo;term&amp;raquo; definition. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. 2010. № 4 (2). Pp. 795-799.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><mixed-citation>Avanesyan N.K., Bagiyan A.Yu. Terminological units as a way of verbalization of the conceptual metaphor &amp;quot;mother&amp;quot; (based on the material of Russian and English) // Cognitive Studies of Language. 2016. Vol. 25. Pp. 363-369.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><mixed-citation>Bagiyan A.Y. The process of determinologization and its cognitive-stylistic relevance. Science and Technology. 2013. Vol. 1. Pp. 257-264.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><mixed-citation>Bagiyan A.Y. Cognitive and philosophical aspects of specific and common lexis correlation // Austrian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 2014. № 5-6. Pp. 69-73.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><mixed-citation>Felber H. Terminology manual. Paris, 1984. 426 p.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>