<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2313-8912</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2313-8912</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2313-8912-2016-4-4-37-42</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">878</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>THEORY OF LANGUAGE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>RITUALITY AS A DISCURSIVE PHENOMENON: GENERAL CHARACTERIZATION OF THE SPEECH REGULATION</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>RITUALITY AS A DISCURSIVE PHENOMENON: GENERAL CHARACTERIZATION OF THE SPEECH REGULATION</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Sardalova</surname><given-names>Luiza Ramazanovna</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Sardalova</surname><given-names>Luiza Ramazanovna</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>luiza.sardalova@mail.ru</email></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>2</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/linguistics/2016/4/Сардалова.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>The article considers general aspects of characterization of the speech regulation from the perspective of the rituality phenomenon as an indivisible discursive element of some discourse types. The author provides various points of view of both Russian and foreign scientists in various areas of knowledge concerning the understanding of the speech regulation as a rituality element. The scopes of the concepts &amp;quot;etiquette&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;regulation&amp;quot; in their discursive refraction are compared. Special attention is paid to various aspects of political communication from the point of view of its cross-cultural features. It is emphasized that not only a social context, but also directly the speaker&amp;#39;s identity exerts a considerable impact on directions of the use of speech etiquette formulas. The analysis of the concept &amp;quot;speech etiquette&amp;quot; from the perspective of an axiological approach is carried out. The aim of making human communication most smooth and successful stands out as a major characteristic of the regulated speech behavior. It is emphasized that the regulatory function of speech regulations is the main one, stabilizing the public relations in general, ordering social communications and determining their general orientation in certain spheres, in particular.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article considers general aspects of characterization of the speech regulation from the perspective of the rituality phenomenon as an indivisible discursive element of some discourse types. The author provides various points of view of both Russian and foreign scientists in various areas of knowledge concerning the understanding of the speech regulation as a rituality element. The scopes of the concepts &amp;quot;etiquette&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;regulation&amp;quot; in their discursive refraction are compared. Special attention is paid to various aspects of political communication from the point of view of its cross-cultural features. It is emphasized that not only a social context, but also directly the speaker&amp;#39;s identity exerts a considerable impact on directions of the use of speech etiquette formulas. The analysis of the concept &amp;quot;speech etiquette&amp;quot; from the perspective of an axiological approach is carried out. The aim of making human communication most smooth and successful stands out as a major characteristic of the regulated speech behavior. It is emphasized that the regulatory function of speech regulations is the main one, stabilizing the public relations in general, ordering social communications and determining their general orientation in certain spheres, in particular.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>rituality</kwd><kwd>regulation</kwd><kwd>etiquette</kwd><kwd>communication</kwd><kwd>discourse</kwd><kwd>political discourse</kwd><kwd>regulatory function</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>rituality</kwd><kwd>regulation</kwd><kwd>etiquette</kwd><kwd>communication</kwd><kwd>discourse</kwd><kwd>political discourse</kwd><kwd>regulatory function</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Arutyunova N.D. Language and individual&amp;#39;s world. Moscow, 1999. 637 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Gazizov R.A. On modern communicative etiquette // Russkaya rech&amp;#39;. 2009. №3. Pp. 36-41</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Gol&amp;#39;din V.E. Etiquette speech: student&amp;#39;s guide. Saratov: Izd-vo Sarat. un-ta, 1978. 111 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Grays G.P. Logic and communicative behavior // Novoe v zarubezhnoy lingvistike. Lingvisticheskaya pragmatika. Vol. 16. Moscow: Progress, 1985. Pp. 217-237.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Gurochkina A.G., Davydova L.Z. Functioning of speech etiquette formulae in the act of verbal communication // Logiko-semanticheskie i pragmaticheskie problemy teksta: Krasnoyarsk: Krasnoyar. gos. ped. in-t,1990. Pp. 47-53.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Zueva E.A. Stereotype verbalization models of the acts of behavioral communication in modern German texts of fiction // Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. N.A.Nekrasova. 2009. №4. Pp. 136-139.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Karasik V.I. Language circle: the individual, concept, discourse. Volgograd: Peremena, 2002. 477 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Kerimov R.D. Political discourse as a special verbal category (as exemplified in the German language) // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2014. № 11 (41): Ch. I. Pp. 100-103.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Kudryavtseva I.A. The problems of speech etiquette in business communication //Nauchnaya mysl&amp;#39;. 2015. № 3 (17). Pp. 57-60.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Ozhegov S.I. The Russian language dictionary / Eds. corr. member of the SSSR Academy of Sciences N.Yu. Shvedovoy. 20-e ed, stereotyped. Moscow: Rus. Yaz., 1988. 750 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Popova E.S. Special features of speech etiquette in business communication // Yazyk i mir izuchaemogo yazyka. 2011. № 2. Pp. 111-116.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Risinzon S.A. Development of the speech etiquette theory // Gumanitarnye issledovaniya. №1 (33). 2010. Pp.107-112.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Sternin I. A. Russian speech etiquette. Voronezh: VOIPKPRO, 1996. 128 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Sternin I.A. Communicative behavior in the structure of national culture // Etnokul&amp;#39;turnaya spetsifika yazykovogo soznaniya. M., 1996. 140 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Formanovskaya N.I. Russian speech etiquette: the linguistic and methodological aspects. 2 ed. Moscow, 1987. 158 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Formanovskaya N.I., Sokolova G.G. Speech etiquette. Russian-French correlations. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 1989. 112 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Shiryaeva T.A. Business discourse as a communicative act // Vestnik Pyatigorskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. 2005. № 3-4. Pp. 92-99.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Shiryaeva T.A. Correlation of the types of institutional business discourse and the ways of it addressing // Yazyk. Tekst. Diskurs. 2008. № 6. Pp. 81-89.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Shiryaeva T.A. Structural-semantic and functional paradigms of modern business discourse: Synopsis of a thesis of Doctor in Philology. Nalchik, 2014. 46 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>Avanesyan N.K., Bagiyan A.Yu. Terminological units as a way of verbalization of the conceptual metaphor &amp;quot;mother&amp;quot; (based on the material of Russian and English) // Cognitive Studies of Language. 2016. Vol. 25. Pp. 363-369.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>Bagiyan A.Y. Cognitive and philosophical aspects of specific and common lexis correlation // Austrian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 2014. № 5-6. Pp. 69-73.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>Bagiyan A.Y. Discourse and different aspects of its definition // Components of Scientific and Technological Progress. 2014. № 2 (20). Pp. 8-13.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><mixed-citation>Bagiyan A.Y. Discourse versus text: differences and similarities // Science and Society. 2014. № 2-1. Pp. 19-26.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><mixed-citation>Bagiyan A.Y. The process of determinologization and its cognitive-stylistic relevance // Science and Technology. 2013. Vol. 1. P. 257-264.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><mixed-citation>Bown P. Politeness: Some Universal in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. 345 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><mixed-citation>Chernousova Y.A., Shiryaeva T.A. Business contract as a pragmalinguistic phenomenon // Middle East Journal of Scientific Research. 2013. Vol. 17. № 2. P. 163-167.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><mixed-citation>Leech G.N. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman, 1983. 250 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><mixed-citation>Morreale S.P., Spitzberg B.H., Barge J.K. Human communication: motivation, knowledge, and skills. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth, 2007. 490 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><mixed-citation>Ting-Toomey S. Communicating across cultures. New York: Guilford Press, 1999. 310 p.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>