2313-8912Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics2313-891210.18413/2313-8912-2016-4-4-54-65880THEORY OF LANGUAGESOFT-BOILED SPEECH: A CONTRASTIVE ANALYSIS OF EUPHEMISMS IN ALGERIAN AND JORDANIAN ARABICSOFT-BOILED SPEECH: A CONTRASTIVE ANALYSIS OF EUPHEMISMS IN ALGERIAN AND JORDANIAN ARABICAziebSamiaAziebSamiaaziebsamia@yahoo.comQudahMahmoudQudahMahmoudmq@psut.edu.joUniversity of Jordan, JordanPrincess Sumaya University for Technology, Jordan20162400

The present contrastive study is geared mainly towards probing into the euphemistic language that Algerian and Jordanian Arabic speakers resort to when certain tabooed topics and concepts are brought to the fore. Intriguingly, such an analysis was done in the light of Brown and Levinson's Politeness Theory. To this end, the data were elicited by dint of two questionnaires which were prepared by first collecting the needed euphemisms from the native speakers of the two dialects under scrutiny. The first one was handed to a randomly chosen sample of 100 Algerian BA students of English at the University of Mohammed Seddik Ben Yahia, Jijel. The second one, however, was given to a randomly chosen sample of 100 Jordanian BA students of English at the University of Jordan. The findings indicate that euphemism is both a linguistic as well as a cultural phenomenon. Accordingly, despite highlighting some similarities between the two cultures under scrutiny in the use of euphemistic terms and expressions, one to one correspondence does not exist. Therefore, taking cognizance of euphemisms in different cultures is a sine qua non for facilitating intercultural communication.

The present contrastive study is geared mainly towards probing into the euphemistic language that Algerian and Jordanian Arabic speakers resort to when certain tabooed topics and concepts are brought to the fore. Intriguingly, such an analysis was done in the light of Brown and Levinson's Politeness Theory. To this end, the data were elicited by dint of two questionnaires which were prepared by first collecting the needed euphemisms from the native speakers of the two dialects under scrutiny. The first one was handed to a randomly chosen sample of 100 Algerian BA students of English at the University of Mohammed Seddik Ben Yahia, Jijel. The second one, however, was given to a randomly chosen sample of 100 Jordanian BA students of English at the University of Jordan. The findings indicate that euphemism is both a linguistic as well as a cultural phenomenon. Accordingly, despite highlighting some similarities between the two cultures under scrutiny in the use of euphemistic terms and expressions, one to one correspondence does not exist. Therefore, taking cognizance of euphemisms in different cultures is a sine qua non for facilitating intercultural communication.

Algerian ArabicEuphemismIntercultural CommunicationJordanian ArabicPoliteness TheoryAlgerian ArabicEuphemismIntercultural CommunicationJordanian ArabicPoliteness TheoryСписок литературыAl-Azzeh, I. (2010). The use of euphemisms by Jordanian speakers of Arabic (Unpublished master’s thesis). Middle East University, Jordan.Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (1991). Euphemism and dysphemism: Language used as a shield and weapon. New York: Oxford University Press.Al-Qarni, M., &  Rabab’ah, G.  (2012). Euphemism in Saudi Arabic and British English.  Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 730–743.Brown, P., & Levinson, S.C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Ghounane, N. (2014). A sociolinguistic view of linguistic taboos and euphemistic strategies in the Algerian Society: Attitudes and beliefs in Tlemcen speech community, International Journal of Research in Applied, Natural and Social Sciences, 2(3), 73-88.Gomaa, A. Y., & Shi, Y. (2012). Softboiled speech: A contrastive analysis of death euphemisms in Egyptian Arabic and Chinese, Global Journal of Human Social Science, 12 (8).Klammer, E., &Willis, H. (1981). A brief handbook of English. New York :Holt, Rinehart and Winston.McArthur, T. (1992). The oxford companion of the English language. New York:  Oxford University Press.Mukattash, L. (2001). Some remarks on Arabic-English contrastive studies, Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 37, 115-126.Online Etymology Dictionary. (http://www.etymonline.com/)Qanbar, N. (2011). A sociolinguistic study of the linguistic taboos in the Yemeni society, MJAL , 3 (2), 86-104.Qi, G. (2010). Cultural differences in Chinese and English euphemisms, Cross-Cultural Communication, 6 (4), 135-141.Rawson, H. (1981). A dictionary of euphemisms and other doubletalk. New York: Crown