<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2313-8912</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Научный результат. Вопросы теоретической и прикладной лингвистики</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2313-8912</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2313-8912-2024-10-2-0-3</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">3498</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>ПРИКЛАДНАЯ ЛИНГВИСТИКА</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;Миметические схемы в мультимодальной контактоустанавливающей коммуникации &lt;/strong&gt;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;Mimetic schemas in multimodal contact-establishing communication &lt;/strong&gt;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Киосе</surname><given-names>Мария Ивановна</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kiose</surname><given-names>Maria I.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>maria_kiose@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Леонтьева</surname><given-names>Анна Васильевна</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Leonteva</surname><given-names>Anna V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>lentevanja27@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Агафонова</surname><given-names>Ольга Владимировна</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Agafonova</surname><given-names>Olga V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>olga.agafonova92@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2" /></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Петров</surname><given-names>Андрей Андреевич</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Petrov</surname><given-names>Andrey A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>petrov@linguanet.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution>Московский государственный лингвистический университет, Институт языкознания РАН, Россия</institution></aff><aff id="aff2"><institution>Московский государственный лингвистический университет, Россия</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/linguistics/2024/2/2024-02_июнь_Том_10_2-46-70.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Установление контакта заслуженно считается основной функцией коммуникации. До недавних пор эта функция изучалась в контексте лингвистического анализа, целью которого является выявление соответствующих дискурсивных маркеров. Тем временем, процесс установления контакта довольно часто находит отражение в жестах. В данной статье развивается когнитивный подход к согласованию между жестами и речью, а также исследуется мультимодальное установление контакта в процессе коммуникации, опосредованное миметическими (иначе &amp;ndash; телесными) схемами, которые реализуются в поведении коммуникантов, участвующих в общении типа &amp;laquo;лицом к лицу&amp;raquo; и &amp;laquo;телом к телу&amp;raquo;. Основываясь на данных мультимодального эксперимента, в рамках которого участники должны были достичь общей позиции в экспозиторном диалоге, мы установили два наиболее частотных контактоустанавливающих рекуррентных жеста, &amp;laquo;открытая ладонь вверх&amp;raquo; и &amp;laquo;открытая ладонь вниз&amp;raquo;, соотносимых с двумя миметическими схемами, ДЕМОНСТРАЦИЯ и СДЕРЖИВАНИЕ. В рамках исследования мы рассматриваем распределение данных схем и их подсхем в жестах и речи. В ходе анализа контактоустанавливающих жестов &amp;laquo;открытая ладонь вверх&amp;raquo; и &amp;laquo;открытая ладонь вниз&amp;raquo; (которые реализуют схемы и подсхемы ДЕМОНСТРАЦИИ и СДЕРЖИВАНИЯ) и вербальных единиц (представляющих когнитивное, прагматическое и функционально-семантическое измерения дискурса), были выявлены мультимодальные паттерны их согласования, опосредованные миметическими схемами ДЕМОНСТРАЦИЯ и СДЕРЖИВАНИЕ в контактоустанавливающей коммуникации. Также были выявлены кластеры контактоустанавливающих жестов &amp;laquo;открытая ладонь вверх&amp;raquo; и &amp;laquo;открытая ладонь вниз&amp;raquo; на основании их вербальных маркеров; данная возможность определяется существованием общих точек роста &amp;laquo;мышления для говорения&amp;raquo;. Установлены лингвистические профили контактоустанавливающих жестов &amp;laquo;открытая ладонь вверх&amp;raquo; и &amp;laquo;открытая ладонь вниз&amp;raquo;. Результаты позволили ранжировать миметических подсхемы с учетом степени проявления событийных и референтных признаков, таких как ситуативность, воплощенность, перформативность, референтная определенность, выдвижение референта, овеществление, динамичность, обращенность, агентивность, референтность. В целом было определено, что в когнитивном измерении события вне коммуникации конструируются с помощью жестов &amp;laquo;открытая ладонь вверх&amp;raquo;, а события коммуникации &amp;ndash; с помощью жестов &amp;laquo;открытая ладонь вниз&amp;raquo;. В прагматическом измерении различие проявляется в использовании констативов с жестами &amp;laquo;открытая ладонь вверх&amp;raquo;, а перформативов &amp;ndash; с жестами &amp;laquo;открытая ладонь вниз&amp;raquo;. В функционально-семантическом измерении жесты &amp;laquo;открытая ладонь вниз&amp;raquo; чаще встречаются с действиями, в то время как жесты &amp;laquo;открытая ладонь вверх&amp;raquo; &amp;ndash; с атрибутами. Также внутрикластерное расстояние в жестах &amp;laquo;открытая ладонь вниз&amp;raquo; проявляется в большей степени, что свидетельствует о б&amp;oacute;льших типологических различиях (установленных с помощью методики непрямых измерений) в данном кластере жестов. Полученные результаты позволили уточнить особенности функционирования мультимодальной контактоустанавливающей коммуникации.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Contact-establishing is deservedly characterized as the major function of communication. Until recently, it has been mostly subjected to linguistic analysis aimed at identifying its discursive markers. Meanwhile, contact-establishing frequently appears in gesturing. The current work develops a cognitive view to gesture and speech alignment, and addresses multimodal contact-establishing communication as mediated by mimetic schemas or bodily schemas shared by communicants who engage in face-to-face and body-to-body interaction. Based on a multimodal experiment where participants engage into task-oriented expository dialogue, we identified two most common contact-establishing recurrent gestures, palm-up-open-hand (PUOH) and palm-down-open-hand (PDOH) gestures contingent on two mimetic schemas, SHOW and RESTRAIN. In the study, we explore the distribution of these two schemas in their sub-schemas in gesture and speech. Following the participants&amp;rsquo; contact-establishing PUOH and PDOH gestures (manifesting SHOW and RESTRAIN sub-schemas) and verbal cues (cognitive, pragmatic, and functional semantic dimensions), we determined the multimodal alignment patterns mediated by SHOW and RESTRAIN mimetic schemas in contact-establishing communication. Additionally, the clusters of PUOH and PDOH contact-establishing gestures were determined via their linguistic correspondences since they account for common thinking-for-speaking growth points and the language profiles of PUOH and PDOH contact-establishing gestures. The results allowed to scale the mimetic sub-schemas as manifesting event and referent features such as situatedness, embodiment, performativity, referent definiteness, referent foregrounding, reification, dynamicity, addressing, agentivity, referentiality. Overall, we established that in cognitive dimension non-situated events prevail in PUOH gestures while situated events prevail in PDOH gestures. In pragmatic dimension there is the difference in constativity in PUOH gestures and in performativity in PDOH gestures. In functional semantic dimension PDOH gestures commonly occur with acts, while PUOH gestures are more frequented with attributes. Additionally, we identified that within-cluster distance in PDOH gestures is more obvious than in PUOH gestures, which signifies that the typological differences (mediated indirectly by linguistic characteristics) in PDOH gestures are more distinct. The data obtained provide new evidence in multimodal contact-establishing communication.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Контактоустанавливающая коммуникация</kwd><kwd>Миметическая схема</kwd><kwd>Мультимодальный эксперимент</kwd><kwd>Жесты «открытая ладонь вверх» и «открытая ладонь вниз»</kwd><kwd>Жест</kwd><kwd>Речь</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Contact-establishing communication</kwd><kwd>Mimetic schema</kwd><kwd>Multimodal experiment</kwd><kwd>PUOH and PDOH gestures</kwd><kwd>Gesture</kwd><kwd>Speech</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ack><p>Благодарности. Положения исследования, представленные в Разделах 1 и 2, разработаны в рамках государственного задания &amp;laquo;Полимодальный анализ коммуникативного поведения говорящего в разных типах устного дискурса&amp;raquo; (FSFU-2020-0021), реализуемого в Московском государственном лингвистическом университете. Результаты исследования, представленные в Секциях 3, 4, 5, получены в рамках государственного задания &amp;laquo;Кинетические и вокальные&amp;nbsp;аспекты коммуникации: параметры варьирования&amp;raquo; (проект № FMNE-2022-0015) в Институте языкознания РАН.&amp;nbsp;</p></ack><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Grishina,&amp;nbsp;E.&amp;nbsp;A&amp;nbsp;(2012). Pointing by hand as a system (based on the multimedia Russian corpus), Topics in the Study of Language, 3, 3&amp;ndash;50. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Iriskhanova,&amp;nbsp;O.&amp;nbsp;K. (2017). On thinking for communicating: the multimodal dimension of aspectuality. Cognitive Studies of Language, 30, 57&amp;ndash;60. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Iriskhanova,&amp;nbsp;O.&amp;nbsp;K. and Nikolayeva,&amp;nbsp;A.&amp;nbsp;I. (2023). Cognitive basis for the variation of recurrent gestures in explanatory discourse: palm-up-open-hand and palm-down-open-hand gestures. Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki, 4, 26&amp;ndash;34. https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2023-4-26-34 (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Iriskhanova,&amp;nbsp;O.&amp;nbsp;K., Kiose,&amp;nbsp;M.&amp;nbsp;I., Leonteva,&amp;nbsp;A.&amp;nbsp;V. and Agafonova,&amp;nbsp;O.&amp;nbsp;V. (2022). Multimodal spatial deixis in speech and gestures: frames of reference in explanatory discourse, Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki, 4, 17&amp;ndash;31. https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2022-4-17-31 (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Kibrik,&amp;nbsp;A.&amp;nbsp;A. and Podlesskaya,&amp;nbsp;V.&amp;nbsp;I.&amp;nbsp;(2009). Night Dream Stories: A Corpus Study of spoken Russian discourse. Languages of Slavonic Culture, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Kiose,&amp;nbsp;M&amp;nbsp;I.&amp;nbsp;(2021). Multimodality as a research technology, in Multimodal dimensions of discourse, Languages of Slavonic Culture, Moscow, Russia, 33&amp;ndash;62. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Lyashevskaya,&amp;nbsp;O.&amp;nbsp;N. and Kashkin,&amp;nbsp;E.&amp;nbsp;V.&amp;nbsp;(2015). Types of information about lexical constructions in Russian FrameBank. Trudy instituta russkogo jazyka im. V.V. Vinogradova, 6, 464&amp;ndash;555. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Paducheva,&amp;nbsp;E.&amp;nbsp;V. (2008).&amp;nbsp;Vyskazyvanie i ego sootnesennost&amp;#39; s dejstvitel&amp;#39;nost&amp;#39;ju: Referencial&amp;#39;nye aspekty semantiki mestoimenij [Utterance and it&amp;rsquo;s alignment with reality: Referential aspects of the semantics of pronouns], LKI, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Alibali,&amp;nbsp;M.&amp;nbsp;W., Spencer,&amp;nbsp;R.&amp;nbsp;C., Knox,&amp;nbsp;L. and Kita,&amp;nbsp;S. (2011). Spontaneous gestures influence strategy choices in problem solving.&amp;nbsp;Psychological science,&amp;nbsp;22(9), 1138&amp;ndash;1144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417722 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Bavelas,&amp;nbsp;J.&amp;nbsp;B., Chovil,&amp;nbsp;N., Coates,&amp;nbsp;L. and Roe,&amp;nbsp;L. (1995). Gestures specialized for dialogue.&amp;nbsp;Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(4), 394&amp;ndash;405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295214010 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Beilock,&amp;nbsp;S.&amp;nbsp;L. and Goldin-Meadow,&amp;nbsp;S. (2010). Gesture changes thought by grounding it in action.&amp;nbsp;Psychological science, 21(11), 1605&amp;ndash;1610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610385353 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Bressem,&amp;nbsp;J., Ladewig,&amp;nbsp;S.&amp;nbsp;H. (2011). Rethinking gesture phases: Articulatory features of gestural movement? Semiotica 184&amp;ndash;1/4, 53&amp;ndash;91. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2011.022 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Chu,&amp;nbsp;M., Meyer,&amp;nbsp;A., Foulkes,&amp;nbsp;L. and Kita,&amp;nbsp;S. (2014). Individual differences in frequency and saliency of speech-accompanying gestures: The role of cognitive abilities and empathy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 694&amp;ndash;709. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033861. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Cienki,&amp;nbsp;A.&amp;nbsp;J. (2013). Image schemas and mimetic schemas in cognitive linguistics and gesture studies. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 11(2), 417&amp;ndash;432. https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.11.2.13cie (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Cienki,&amp;nbsp;A. (2017). Ten lectures on Spoken language and Gesture from Perspective of Cognitive Linguistics. Issues of Dynamicity and Multimodality. Brill, Leiden, Boston, the Netherlands, USA. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Cienki,&amp;nbsp;A. (2021). From the finger lift to the palm-up open hand when presenting a point: A methodological exploration of forms and functions. Languages and Modalities, 1, 17&amp;ndash;30. https://doi.org/10.3897/lamo.1.68914 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Cienki,&amp;nbsp;A. and M&amp;uuml;ller,&amp;nbsp;C. (2008). Metaphor, gesture, and thought, in Gibbs,&amp;nbsp;R.&amp;nbsp;W. Jr. (Ed.),&amp;nbsp;The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. P. 483&amp;ndash;501.&amp;nbsp;https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.029 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Clark,&amp;nbsp;H.&amp;nbsp;H. (2016). Depicting as a method of communication. Psychological Review, 123(3), 324&amp;ndash;347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/rev0000026 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Clift,&amp;nbsp;R. (2020). Stability and Visibility in Embodiment: The ʻPalm up&amp;rsquo; in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 169, 190&amp;ndash;205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.005 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>Cooperrider,&amp;nbsp;K., Abner,&amp;nbsp;N. and Goldin-Meadow,&amp;nbsp;S. (2018). The Palm-Up Puzzle: Meanings and Origins of a Widespread Form in Gesture and Sign. Front. Commun., 3:23. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2018.00023 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>Ford,&amp;nbsp;C.&amp;nbsp;E., Thompson,&amp;nbsp;S.&amp;nbsp;A. and Drake,&amp;nbsp;V. (2012). Bodily-Visual Practices and Turn Continuation. Discourse Process, 49, 192&amp;ndash;212. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2012.654761 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>Freedman,&amp;nbsp;N. (1972). The analysis of movement behavior during the clinical interview, in Siegman, A.&amp;nbsp;W. and Pope,&amp;nbsp;B. (eds.), Studies in dyadic communication, NY: Pergamon Press, New York, USA, 153&amp;ndash;175. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-015867-9.50012-5 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><mixed-citation>G&amp;ouml;ksun,&amp;nbsp;T., Goldin-Meadow,&amp;nbsp;S., Newcombe,&amp;nbsp;N. and Shipley,&amp;nbsp;T. (2013). Individual differences in mental rotation: what does gesture tell us?.&amp;nbsp;Cognitive processing,&amp;nbsp;14(2), 153&amp;ndash;162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-013-0549-1 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><mixed-citation>Holler,&amp;nbsp;J., Kendrick,&amp;nbsp;K.&amp;nbsp;H. and Levinson,&amp;nbsp;S.&amp;nbsp;C. (2018). Processing language in face-to-face conversation: Questions with gestures get faster responses. Psychon Bull Rev, 25, 1900&amp;ndash;1908 https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1363-z (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><mixed-citation>Iriskhanova,&amp;nbsp;O.&amp;nbsp;K., Kiose,&amp;nbsp;M.&amp;nbsp;I., Leonteva,&amp;nbsp;A.&amp;nbsp;V. and Agafonova,&amp;nbsp;O.&amp;nbsp;V. (2023). Multimodal languaging: Reification profiles in language and gesture. Linguistic Frontiers, 6(2), 78&amp;ndash;91. https://doi.org/10.2478/lf-2023-0014 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><mixed-citation>Kang,&amp;nbsp;S., Tversky,&amp;nbsp;B. and Black,&amp;nbsp;J.&amp;nbsp;B. (2015). Coordinating gesture, word, and diagram: explanations for experts and novices.&amp;nbsp;Spatial Cognition &amp;amp; Computation,&amp;nbsp;15(1), 1&amp;ndash;26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2014.958837 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><mixed-citation>Kendon,&amp;nbsp;A. (1995). Gestures as illocutionary and discourse structure markers in Southern Italian conversation.&amp;nbsp;Journal of Pragmatics, 23(3), 247&amp;ndash;279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00037-F (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><mixed-citation>Kendon,&amp;nbsp;A. (2004). Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807572 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><mixed-citation>Kiose,&amp;nbsp;M.&amp;nbsp;I., Rzheshevskaya,&amp;nbsp;A.&amp;nbsp;A., Izmalkova,&amp;nbsp;A.&amp;nbsp;I. and Makeev,&amp;nbsp;S.&amp;nbsp;D. (2023). Foregrounding and accessibility effects in the gaze behavior of the readers with different cognitive style. Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies. Papers from the Annual International Conference &amp;ldquo;Dialogue&amp;rdquo;, 22, 225&amp;ndash;232. https://doi.org/10.28995/2075-7182-2023-22-225-232 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><mixed-citation>Kita,&amp;nbsp;S., van&amp;nbsp;Gijn,&amp;nbsp;I. and van&amp;nbsp;der&amp;nbsp;Hulst,&amp;nbsp;H. (1998). Movement phases in signs and cospeech gestures and their transcription by human encoders, in Ipke Wachsmuth &amp;amp; Martin Fr&amp;ouml;hlich (eds.), Gesture and sign language in human-computer interaction, 23&amp;ndash;35. Berlin: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BFb0052986 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><mixed-citation>Levinson,&amp;nbsp;S.&amp;nbsp;C. (2003). Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613609 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><mixed-citation>Marrese&amp;nbsp;O.&amp;nbsp;H., Raymond&amp;nbsp;C.&amp;nbsp;W., Fox&amp;nbsp;B.&amp;nbsp;A., Ford&amp;nbsp;C.&amp;nbsp;E. and Pielke&amp;nbsp;M. (2021). The Grammar of Obviousness: The Palm-Up Gesture in Argument Sequences. Front. Commun., 6:663067. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.663067 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><mixed-citation>McNeill,&amp;nbsp;D. (2005). Gesture, gaze, and ground, MLMI&amp;#39;05: Proceedings of the Second international conference on Machine Learning for Multimodal Interaction, Edinburgh, UK, 1&amp;ndash;14. https://doi.org/10.1007/11677482_1 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><mixed-citation>M&amp;uuml;ller,&amp;nbsp;C. (2004). Forms and uses of the Palm Up Open Hand: A case of a gesture family? The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures. Proceeding of the Berlin conference, Berlin, Germany, 233&amp;ndash;256. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><mixed-citation>Nippold,&amp;nbsp;M.&amp;nbsp;A. and Scott,&amp;nbsp;C.&amp;nbsp;M. (2009). Expository Discourse in Children, Adolescents, and Adults: Development and Disorders. New York: Psychology Press., New York, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203848821 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><mixed-citation>Rodero,&amp;nbsp;E. (2022). Effectiveness, Attractiveness, and Emotional Response to Voice Pitch and Hand Gestures in Public Speaking. Frontiers in Communication, 7: 869084. DOI: https://doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2022.869084 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><mixed-citation>Shaw,&amp;nbsp;E.&amp;nbsp;P. (2013). Gesture in Multiparty Interaction: A Study of Embodied Discourse in Spoken English and American Sign Language. PhD thesis. Georgetown University, Washington DC, USA. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><mixed-citation>Shusterman,&amp;nbsp;A. and Li&amp;nbsp;P. (2016). A Framework for Work on Frames of Reference, in Barner,&amp;nbsp;D. and Baron,&amp;nbsp;A.&amp;nbsp;S. (eds.), Core Knowledge and Conceptual Change, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. P. 191&amp;ndash;206. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><mixed-citation>Streeck,&amp;nbsp;J. (2009). Forward-gesturing. Discourse Processes, 46(2-3), 161&amp;ndash;179. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530902728793 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><mixed-citation>Van Dijk,&amp;nbsp;T. (1990). Issues in Functional Discourse Analysis, in Pinkster,&amp;nbsp;H. and Genee,&amp;nbsp;I. (eds.),&amp;nbsp;Unity in Diversity: Papers Presented to Simon C. Dik on his 50th Birthday, De Gruyter Mouton, Boston, USA, 27&amp;ndash;46.&amp;nbsp;https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110847420.27 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><mixed-citation>Yasui,&amp;nbsp;E. (2013). Collaborative idea construction: Repetition of gestures and talk in joint brainstorming. Journal of Pragmatics, 46(1), 157&amp;ndash;172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.10.002 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B42"><mixed-citation>Zlatev, J. (2005). What&amp;rsquo;s in a schema? Bodily mimesis and the grounding of language, in Beate Hampe (ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics, 313&amp;ndash;343. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. (In English)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B43"><mixed-citation>Zlatev, J. Image schemas, mimetic schemas, and children&amp;rsquo;s gestures (2014). Cognitive Semiotics, 7(1), 3&amp;ndash;29. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem-2014-0002 (In English)</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>