<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2313-8912</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Научный результат. Вопросы теоретической и прикладной лингвистики</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2313-8912</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2313-8912-2024-10-3-0-5</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">3544</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>ПРИКЛАДНАЯ ЛИНГВИСТИКА</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;Анализ клавиатурного почерка в исследованиях письма: библиометрический обзор с использованием инструментов R и VOSviewer&lt;/strong&gt;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;A keystroke analysis to study writing: a bibliometric review using R and VOSviewer&lt;/strong&gt;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Дехнич</surname><given-names>Ольга Витальевна</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Dekhnich</surname><given-names>Olga V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>dekhnich@bsu.edu.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" /></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Литвинова</surname><given-names>Татьяна Александровна</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Litvinova</surname><given-names>Tatiana A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>centr_rus_yaz@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2" /></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution>Белгородский государственный национальный исследовательский университет, Россия</institution></aff><aff id="aff2"><institution>Воронежский государственный педагогический университет, Россия</institution></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/linguistics/2024/3/ВТиПЛ_2024_10_3-91-115.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Данные клавиатурного почерка, то есть длительность и количество нажатий клавиш, которые регистрируются с использованием программ-кейлоггеров, широко используются в различных областях знаний, в том числе для решения прикладных задач &amp;ndash; от ранней диагностики когнитивных нарушений до идентификации пользователя. Также академические кейлоггеры и извлекаемые с их помощью данные активно используются в такой междисциплинарной области, как исследования письма (writing research), поскольку позволяют наблюдать за процессом создания текста, не вмешиваясь в него. Подобные исследования ведутся начиная с появлением общедоступных персональных компьютеров, то есть с конца 1990-х годов, однако библиометрический анализ таких работ, то есть анализ, направленный на выявление общей картины рассматриваемого предметного поля, определение его концептуальной структуры, наиболее активно исследуемых тем, наиболее цитируемых работ и авторов, до настоящего времени отсутствовал. Данная статья представляет собой первый опыт библиометрического анализа научных работ, направленных на анализ процесса создания текста с использованием данных кейлоггеров. Мы анализировали работы, индексируемые в базе данных Scopus и опубликованные в период с 2001 по 2024 год (273 работы было отобрано с использованием протокола PRISMA). В качестве инструментов исследования нами были выбраны библиотека на языке R bibliometrix и программа VOSviewer. С использованием данных инструментов нами были определены наиболее продуктивные и цитируемые исследователи, институты и страны, а также наиболее значимые работы. На основе различных методов анализа совместной встречаемости ключевых слов, реализованных в данных инструментах, нами была построена концептуальная структура предметного поля, а также определены исследовательские тренды. Значимость настоящей работы определяется двумя факторами. Во-первых, она содержит результаты первого библиометрического анализа важной и активно развивающейся предметной области, ограниченной, однако, с точки зрения географической принадлежности ведущих исследователей и языков, на материале которых проводятся такие исследования. Подобный анализ, как представляется, позволить ознакомить с состоянием работ в данной области тех ученых, для которых она является новой. Во-вторых, данное исследование представляет собой пример комбинации методов автоматического анализ научной литературы, которая может быть применена для анализа иных предметных областей.



</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Data obtained by means of keystroke logging software, which records all writing events, i.e., all keypresses with their time stamps, are widely used in different research fields and practical applications &amp;ndash; from early detection of cognitive impairments to user authentication. Keystroke logging software have become especially popular in writing studies since it allows researchers to observe writing processes unobtrusively and increases their understanding of what happens &amp;ldquo;behind the scenes&amp;rdquo; of text production. This methodology has been used in writing studies since the advent of affordable computers in the 1990s, however, there has still been no bibliometric review that would provide a holistic picture of this field and identify hot topics and trends, perform citation analysis and identify the most productive authors and countries in the field of writing research using keystroke data. This paper is pioneer research to conducting a bibliometric analysis on the field &amp;ldquo;keystroke analysis to study writing&amp;rdquo; aimed at filling in the gap. A search was conducted in the bibliographic database Scopus on July 11, 2024. We included studies published in English post-2000 that discuss the use of keystroke data and methodology to study writing process. This review followed the guidelines of the PRISMA protocol to perform the study search and selection. The search yielded 336 documents of which 273 met out inclusion criteria. The records retrieved were analysed using the bibliometrix R-package and VOSviewer software. Using these tools in combinations, we implemented both performance analysis which examines the contributions of research constituents to a given field and science mapping which is aimed at revealing the relationships between research constituents. The contribution of this study is twofold. Firstly, it provides an in-depth bibliometric analysis of an actively developing field of research which is rather limited in terms osf the countries and institutions involved (and the languages of the texts analysed), hopefully saving time and effort for researchers new to the field. Secondly, we provide an example of using bibliometrix and VOSviewer for a bibliometric analysis which could be easily replicated in further research.



</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Исследования письма</kwd><kwd>Клавиатурный почерк</kwd><kwd>Библиометрический анализ</kwd><kwd>Библиотека bibliometrix на языке R</kwd><kwd>VOSviewer</kwd><kwd>Анализ цитирований</kwd><kwd>Концептуальная структура предметного поля</kwd><kwd>Тематическое развитие предметного поля</kwd><kwd>PRISMA</kwd><kwd>Scopus</kwd><kwd>Ключевое слово</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Writing research</kwd><kwd>Writing studies</kwd><kwd>Keystroke dynamics</kwd><kwd>Bibliometric review</kwd><kwd>bibliometrix R-package</kwd><kwd>VOSviewer</kwd><kwd>Citation analysis</kwd><kwd>Conceptual structure</kwd><kwd>Thematic evolution</kwd><kwd>PRISMA protocol</kwd><kwd>Scopus database</kwd><kwd>Keyword co-occurrence</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ack><p>Т.А. Литвинова благодарит за финансовую поддержку Министерство просвещения Российской Федерации (работа выполнена при финансовой поддержке Министерства просвещения Российской Федерации в рамках выполнения государственного задания в сфере науки, номер темы QRPK-2024-0011). О.В. Дехнич не получала финансовой поддержки за выполнение исследований, написание и публикацию статьи.</p></ack><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Alfalahi,&amp;nbsp;H., Khandoker,&amp;nbsp;A.&amp;nbsp;H., Chowdhury,&amp;nbsp;N., Iakovakis,&amp;nbsp;D., Dias,&amp;nbsp;S.&amp;nbsp;B., Chaudhuri,&amp;nbsp;K.&amp;nbsp;R. and Hadjileontiadis,&amp;nbsp;L.&amp;nbsp;J. (2022). Diagnostic accuracy of keystroke dynamics as digital biomarkers for fine motor decline in neuropsychiatric disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.&amp;nbsp;Sci Rep&amp;nbsp;12, 7690. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11865-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Aria,&amp;nbsp;M. and Cuccurullo,&amp;nbsp;C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics 11(4), 959&amp;ndash;975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>Bixler,&amp;nbsp;R. and D&amp;rsquo;Mello,&amp;nbsp;S. (2013). Detecting boredom and engagement during writing with keystroke analysis, task appraisals, and stable traits. In Proceedings of the 2013 International conference on Intelligent user interfaces (IUI &amp;lsquo;13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 225&amp;ndash;234. https://doi.org/10.1145/2449396.2449426</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>B&amp;uuml;y&amp;uuml;kkıdık,&amp;nbsp;S. (2022). A bibliometric analysis: A tutorial for the bibliometrix package in R using IRT literature. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology 13(3), 164&amp;ndash;193. https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.1069307</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Cui,&amp;nbsp;Y., Mou,&amp;nbsp;J. and Liu,&amp;nbsp;Y. (2018). Knowledge mapping of social commerce research: A visual analysis using CiteSpace. Electronic Commerce Research, 18(4), 837&amp;ndash;868.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Derviş,&amp;nbsp;H. (2019). Bibliometric analysis using bibliometrix an R package. Journal of Scientometric Research 8(3), 156&amp;ndash;160. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.8.3.32</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Donthu,&amp;nbsp;N.,&amp;nbsp;Kumar,&amp;nbsp;S., Mukherjee,&amp;nbsp;D., Pandey,&amp;nbsp;N. and Lim,&amp;nbsp;W.&amp;nbsp;M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines.&amp;nbsp;Journal of Business Research 133,&amp;nbsp;285&amp;ndash;296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Farrukh,&amp;nbsp;M., Raza,&amp;nbsp;A., Mansoor,&amp;nbsp;A., Khan, M.&amp;nbsp;S. and Lee,&amp;nbsp;J.&amp;nbsp;W.&amp;nbsp;C. (2023). Trends and patterns in pro-environmental behaviour research: a bibliometric review and research agenda. Benchmarking: an International Journal 30(3), 681&amp;ndash;696. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-10-2020-0521</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Lee,&amp;nbsp;S.&amp;nbsp;A. and Park,&amp;nbsp;J.&amp;nbsp;H. (2024). Do Individuals with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Healthy Aging People Have Different Keystroke Dynamics? A Systematic Review. International Journal of Gerontology 18(2), 64&amp;ndash;69. https://doi.org/10.6890/IJGE.202404_18(2).0001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Leijten,&amp;nbsp;M. and Van&amp;nbsp;Waes,&amp;nbsp;L. (2013). Keystroke logging in writing research: Using inputlog to analyze and visualize writing processes. Written Communication 30(3), 358&amp;ndash;392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088313491692</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Leijten, M., Van Waes, L., Schriver, K. and Hayes, J. R. (2013). Writing in the workplace: Constructing documents using multiple digital sources. Journal of Writing Research 5(3), 285&amp;ndash;337. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2014.05.03.3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Logan,&amp;nbsp;G.&amp;nbsp;D. and Crump,&amp;nbsp;M.&amp;nbsp;J. (2010). Cognitive illusions of authorship reveal hierarchical error detection in skilled typists. Science 330(6004), 683&amp;ndash;686. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1190483</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Maalej,&amp;nbsp;A. and Kallel,&amp;nbsp;I. (2020). Does Keystroke Dynamics tell us about Emotions? A Systematic Literature Review and Dataset Construction. In 2020 16th International Conference on Intelligent Environments (IE), Madrid, Spain, 60&amp;ndash;67. https://doi.org/10.1109/IE49459.2020.9155004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Nguyen,&amp;nbsp;T.&amp;nbsp;M., Leow,&amp;nbsp;A.&amp;nbsp;D. and Ajilore,&amp;nbsp;O. (2023). A Review on Smartphone Keystroke Dynamics as a Digital Biomarker for Understanding Neurocognitive Functioning. Brain Sci. 13, 959. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13060959</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Omotehinwa,&amp;nbsp;T.&amp;nbsp;O. (2022). Examining the developments in scheduling algorithms research: a bibliometric approach.&amp;nbsp;Heliyon 8(5), e09510.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Passas,&amp;nbsp;I. (2024). Bibliometric Analysis: The Main Steps. Encyclopedia 4, 1014&amp;ndash;1025. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia4020065</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>Quraishi,&amp;nbsp;S.&amp;nbsp;J. and Bedi,&amp;nbsp;S.&amp;nbsp;S. (2018). Keystroke Dynamics Biometrics, A tool for User Authentication &amp;ndash; Review. In 2018 International Conference on System Modeling &amp;amp; Advancement in Research Trends (SMART), Moradabad, India, 248&amp;ndash;254. https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSMART.2018.8746932</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Rashid,&amp;nbsp;M.&amp;nbsp;F.&amp;nbsp;A. (2023). How to Conduct a Bibliometric Analysis using R Packages: A Comprehensive Guidelines. Journal of Tourism, Hospitality &amp;amp; Culinary Arts 15(1), 24&amp;ndash;39.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Raul,&amp;nbsp;N., Shankarmani,&amp;nbsp;R. and Joshi,&amp;nbsp;P. (2020). A Comprehensive Review of Keystroke Dynamics-Based Authentication Mechanism. In: Khanna,&amp;nbsp;A., Gupta,&amp;nbsp;D., Bhattacharyya,&amp;nbsp;S., Snasel,&amp;nbsp;V., Platos,&amp;nbsp;J., Hassanien,&amp;nbsp;A. (eds). International Conference on Innovative Computing and Communications. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 1059. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0324-5_13</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>Rejeb,&amp;nbsp;A., Rejeb,&amp;nbsp;K., Appolloni,&amp;nbsp;A., Kayikci,&amp;nbsp;Y. and Iranmanesh,&amp;nbsp;M. (2023). The landscape of public procurement research: a bibliometric analysis and topic modelling based on Scopus. Journal of Public Procurement 23(2), 145&amp;ndash;178. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-06-2022-0031</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>Saini,&amp;nbsp;G.&amp;nbsp;K., Lievens,&amp;nbsp;F. and Srivastava,&amp;nbsp;M. (2022). Employer and internal branding research: a bibliometric analysis of 25 years. Journal of Product &amp;amp; Brand Management 31(8), 1196&amp;ndash;1221. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-06-2021-3526</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>Small,&amp;nbsp;H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents. J Am Soc Inf Sci 24, 265&amp;ndash;269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><mixed-citation>Stevenson,&amp;nbsp;M., Schoonen,&amp;nbsp;R. and Glopper,&amp;nbsp;K.&amp;nbsp;de. (2006). Revising in two languages: A multi-dimensional comparison of online writing revisions in L1 and FL. Journal of Second Language Writing 15(3), 201&amp;ndash;233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.06.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><mixed-citation>Tikhonova E., Kosycheva M., Kasatkin P. (2023). Exploring Academic Culture: Unpacking its Definition and Structure (a Systematic Scoping Review). Journal of Language and Education 9(36), 151-168. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2023.18491</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><mixed-citation>Van&amp;nbsp;Eck,&amp;nbsp;N.&amp;nbsp;J. and Waltman,&amp;nbsp;L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric networks. In Y.&amp;nbsp;Ding, R.&amp;nbsp;Rousseau and D.&amp;nbsp;Wolfram (Eds.), Measuring scholarly impact: Methods and practice (pp. 285&amp;ndash;320). Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><mixed-citation>Wang,&amp;nbsp;S. and Gu,&amp;nbsp;Z. (2022). Mapping the Field of Value Chain: A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis. Sustainability&amp;nbsp;14, 7063. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127063</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><mixed-citation>Wengelin,&amp;nbsp;&amp;Aring;. (2006). Examining Pauses in Writing: Theory, Methods and Empirical Data. In Computer Keystroke Logging and Writing: Methods and Applications. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9780080460932_008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><mixed-citation>Wengelin,&amp;nbsp;&amp;Aring;. and Johansson,&amp;nbsp;V. (2023). Investigating Writing Processes with Keystroke Logging. In: Kruse,&amp;nbsp;O. et al. Digital Writing Technologies in Higher Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36033-6_25</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><mixed-citation>Yang,&amp;nbsp;L. and Qin,&amp;nbsp;S.-F. (2021). A Review of Emotion Recognition Methods From Keystroke, Mouse, and Touchscreen Dynamics. IEEE Access 9, 162197&amp;ndash;162213. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3132233</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>