DOI:
10.18413/2313-8912-2017-3-1-3-12
HUMAN MENTAL ABSTRACTION SPECIFICITY EMERGENCE UNDER DISTRIBUTED COMMUNICATIVE PRESSURE
Being mammals, humans both share with other animals varied forms of information exchange typical for that class and have something that makes them different, i.e. higher-order thinking, languages and unprecedented social activity resulting in a great diversity of cultures. People are particularly skilled in coordinating their activities, human communities rely on mind-sharing that is realized through distributed cognition. It is argued in the paper that human species’ socially distributed cognition is an extension to their biologically distributed cognition both being inseparable from distributed communicative interactions. From the biosemiotic perspective, humans can be described as very complex dynamic living systems that are continuously involved in multifaceted communicative activity but so are all living systems, and lower-level mental abstraction could have evolved in terms of spatial cognition employed in on-line communicative interaction with the environment. It is proposed that that initial level of mental abstraction could then advance into higher-order thinking when humans developed communication off-line. Thus human semiotic mind specificity became possible due to biological and social distributed cognition and communication complementarity. The recorded history of mankind gives evidence that the focus on the off-line communication has been increasingly rising ever since. The shift from on-line to off-line interaction ensured the unparalleled social cooperation due to the distribution of cognitive processes across the members of a social group independently of 'here and now'.
Keywords: evolution,
mental abstraction,
spatial cognition,
lower-order and higher-order mental abstraction,
on- and off-line communication,
distributed cognition and communication,
language origin.
Number of views: 10692 (view statistics)
Количество скачиваний: 8114
While nobody left any comments to this publication.
You can be first.
1. Abieva N.A. Human Mind and Semiotic Capacity Co-Evolution // Modern Problems of Linguistics, Literary Studies, Intercultural Communication and Linguodidactics: Proceedings of the II International Scientific Conference, April 20-21, 2016, Belgorod, Russia / Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Doctor of Philology, prof. V.A. Vinogradov. Belgorod: Publishing House "Belgorod" Research Institute "BelGU", 2016. pp. 61 - 66.
2. Abieva N.A. The Role of off-line communication in human evolution. Biosemiotics, 1(3) (2008): 295 – 311.
3. Barbieri M. Code Biology – A New Science of Life. Biosemiotics, 5(3), (2012): 411-437.
4. Bickerton, D. Language and Human Behavior. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1995. P. 190.
5. Chomsky N. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press, 1965. P. 251.
6. Chomsky, N. Knowledge of Language. New York: Praeger, 1986.
7. Deacon, T. The Evolution of Language Systems in the Human Brain. In: Evolution of Nervous Systems. V. 5. The Evolution of Primate Nervous Systems. John Kaas (Editor-in-Chief). Elsevier, 2006. URL: http://teleodynamics.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/2013/10/Deacon_EncycloEntry.pdf (date of access: February 27, 2017).
8. Donald, M. The slow process: A hypothetical cognitive adaptation for distributed cognitive networks. Journal of Physiology, 101, (2007): 214-222.
9. Evans, J. S. B. Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 59, (2008): 255-278.
10. Goodwin, R. Q., Wason, P. C. Degrees of insight. British Journal of Psychology, 63, (1972): 205-212.
11. Hoffmeyer, J. Biosemiotics: An Examination into the Signs of Life and the Life of Signs. Scranton: University of Scranton Press, 2008. P. 419.
12. Hoffmeyer J. Origin of Species by Natural Translation // Susan Petrilli (ed.): Translation. Translation. Rodopi, Amsterdam /New York, 2008: 329-346.
13. Kahneman, D. A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58, No. 9, (2003): 697-720.
14. Kirsh, D. Thinking with external representations. Artificial Intelligence and Society, 25, (2010): 441-454.
15. Kull, K. Vegetative, animal, and cultural semiosis: The semiotic threshold zones. Cognitive Semiotics, v. 4, (2009): 8-27.
16. Lenneberg, E. Biological foundations of language. New York: John Wiley, 1967.
17. Logan, R. К. Mind and Language Architecture. The Open Neuroimaging Journal, 4, (2010): 81-92.
18. Mosby's Medical Dictionary, 8th edition. http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/abstract+thinking (date of access: February 27, 2017).
19. Paivio A. Dual Coding Theory and Education (Draft). Pathways to Literacy Achievement for High Poverty Children. The University of Michigan School of Education, 29. 9.- 1. 10. 2006 (2006). URL: http://www.csuchico.edu/~nschwartz/paivio.pdf (date of access: February 27, 2017).
20. Paivio, A. Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1971. P. 596.
21. Paivio, A. Mental representations: a dual coding approach. Oxford. England: Oxford University Press, 1986. P. 322.
22. Pinker, S. The Language Instinct. New York: Harper Collins, 1994. P. 497.
23. Rooij, M.M.J.W. van, Favela, L.H. A nonlinear dynamical systems theory perspective on dual-processing accounts of decision-making under uncertainty. Papafragou, A.; Grodner, D.; Mirman, D. (ed.), Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci). Philadelphia, PA : Cognitive Science Society, (2016): 1673-1678. URL:
https://mindmodeling.org/cogsci2016/papers/0294/ (date of access: February 27, 2017).
24. Rosen, G. Abstract Objects. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2001). URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/abstract-objects/ (date of access: February 27, 2017).
25. Sharov, A. The origin of mind: Transition from protosemiosis to eusemiosis. Gatherings in Biosemiotics. Silver Rattasepp, Tyler Bennet (eds.). Tartu Semiotics Library 11. Tartu: University of Tartu Press. (2012): 215-216.
26. Stanovich, K. E. Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1999. P. 296.
27. Swan, L.S., Goldberg, L.J. How is Meaning Grounded in the Organism? Biosemiotics, 3(2), (2010): 131-146.
28.What Does Abstract Thinking Mean? http://www.ehow.com/facts_7185614_abstract-thinking-mean_.html#ixzz1Gg42oHMX (date of access: February 27, 2017).