A comparative study of lexical bundles in linguistics and biology Ph.D. dissertations
Lexical bundles are considered as one of the main rhetorical features in academic genres. The appropriate use of these features adds to the coherence and naturalness of the texts. Recently, genre analysis studies tend to investigate the similarities and differences across different academic disciplines and the effects of the first language of writers on the employment of these linguistic features. There are limited studies, however, in the field with a mere focus on the use of lexical bundles in PhD dissertations and the similarities and differences on the employment of these features among native and non-native English writers. In this regard, the current study, following a comparative corpus-based approach, investigated the use of lexical bundles in English PhD dissertations written by native English-speaking and non-native Kurdish-speaking writers across the two disciplines of biology and linguistics. All the compiled dissertations were selected from the ones published between 2010 to 2020 in British universities to keep the compiled corpora comparable. In the next phase, the distribution, linguistic structures, and functions of bundles used in introduction and literature review sections of the compiled dissertations were analyzed using WordSmith 6th edition concordancing software. The analysis provides a list of the most frequently used lexical bundles in each scientific field and among the two groups of writers. The structural analysis showed that noun phrases and prepositional phrases were the most frequently used bundles between both groups of writers and of disciplines. It was also found that passive structures were commonly used in biology dissertations. The functional analysis revealed that non-native Kurdish writers tended to use more research-oriented and text-oriented bundles in comparison with their native counterparts. It was suggested that the rhetorical differences and similarities between the two groups of writers and the disciplines could be attributed to the experience or proficiency levels of writers and the conventions, knowledge construction principles and research approaches of each academic discourse community. Pedagogically speaking, it is discussed that teaching discursive features and including language teaching tasks drawn from authentic texts such as text analysis tasks, focused tasks, extended writing tasks enable EAP learners to learn how to employ these linguistic features effectively to improve the flow of information, coherence and fluency in their academic texts.
Figures
Ahmed, A. A. and Ariannejad, A. (2024). A comparative study of lexical bundles in linguistics and biology Ph.D. dissertations, Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, 10 (1), 47-60. DOI: 10.18413/2313-8912-2024-10-1-0-4
While nobody left any comments to this publication.
You can be first.
Ädel, A. and Erman, B. (2012). Recurrent word combinations in academic writing by native and non-native speakers of English: A lexical bundles approach, English for Specific Purposes, 31 (2), 81–92. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.08.004(In English)
Amirian, Z., Ketabi, S. and Eshaghi, H. (2013). The use of lexical bundles in native and non-native post-graduate writing: The case of applied linguistics MA theses, Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 5 (11), 1-29. (In English)
Appel, R. and Wood, D. (2016). Recurrent word combinations in EAP test-taker writing: Differences between high-and low-proficiency levels, Language Assessment Quarterly, 13 (1), 55-71. http://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2015.1126718(In English)
Ahmed, A. (2021). The employment of lexical bundles in English PhD dissertations written by English-speaking and Kurdish-speaking writers (Unpublished Master’s Thesis), Near East University, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Biber, D. (2006). Stance in spoken and written university registers, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5 (2), 97-116. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.05.001(In English)
Biber, D., Conrad, S. and Cortes, V. (2004). If you look at…: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks, Applied linguistics, 25 (3), 371-405. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.3.371(In English)
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. and Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English, Pearson, London, UK. (In English)
Byrd, P. and Coxhead, A. (2010). On the other hand: Lexical bundles in academic writing and in the teaching of EAP, University of Sydney Papers in TESOL, 5, 31-64. (In English)
Candarli, D. and Jones, S. (2019). Paradigmatic influences on lexical bundles in research articles in the discipline of education, Corpora, 14 (2), 237-263. http://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2019.0170(In English)
Cao, F. (2021). A comparative study of lexical bundles across paradigms and disciplines, Corpora, 16 (1), 97-128. https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2021.0210(In English)
Chen, Y. and Baker, P. (2010). Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing, Language Learning & Technology, 14 (2), 30–49. http://doi.org/10125/44213(In English)
Cortes, V. (2004). Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology, English for Specific Purposes, 23 (4), 397–423. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2003.12.001(In English)
Cortes, V. (2008). A comparative analysis of lexical bundles in academic history writing in English and Spanish, Corpora, 3 (1), 43-57. https://doi.org/10.3366/E1749503208000063(In English)
Gholaminejad, R. (2021). A Comparison of two: Lexical bundles in the discourse of applied linguistics, Atlantis Journal of the Spanish Association for Anglo-American Studies, 43 (2), 90-109. https://doi.org/10.28914/Atlantis-2021-43.2.05(In English)
Gil, N. N. and Caro, E. M. (2019). Lexical bundles in learner and expert academic writing, Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 12 (1), 65-90. http://doi.org/10.5565/REV/JTL3.794(In English)
Hernández, P. S. (2020). Lexical bundles and moves in research article abstracts of different disciplines, Odisea: Revista de Estudios Ingleses, 21, 71-87. http://doi.org/10.25115/odisea.v0i21.4130(In English)
Hyland, K. (2008a). As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation, English for Specific Purposes, 27 (1), 4-21. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2007.06.001(In English)
Hyland, K. (2008b). Academic clusters: Text patterning in published and postgraduate writing, International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18 (1), 41-62. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2007.06.001(In English)
Hyland, K. (2009). Academic discourse: English in a global context, Continuum, London, UK. (In English)
Jalali, Z. S. and Moini, M. (2018). A corpus-based study of lexical bundles in discussion section of medical research articles, Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies, 10 (1), 95-124. http://doi.org/10.22111/IJALS.2018.4265(In English)
Jalili, H. (2013). Lexical bundles in applied linguistics: Variations across postgraduate genres, Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Translation Studies, 2 (2), 1-29. http://doi.org/10.22034/EFL.2013.79199(In English)
Jones, M. and Haywood, S. (2004). Facilitating the acquisition of formulaic sequences, in Schmitt, N., Formulaic sequences, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 269-292. (In English)
Kashiha, H. and Chan, S. H. (2015). A little bit about: Differences in native and non-native speakers’ use of formulaic language, Australian Journal of Linguistics, 35 (4), 297-310. http://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2015.1067132(In English)
Masoumi, D. and Lindstrom, B. (2009). Foundations of cultural design in e-learning, International Journal of Internet and Enterprise Management, 6 (2), 124-142. http://doi.org/10.1504/IJIEM.2009.023926(In English)
Nasrabady, P., Shirvan, M. E. and Golparvar, S. E. (2020). Exploring lexical bundles in recent published papers in the field of applied linguistics, Journal of World Languages, 6 (3), 175-197. http://doi.org/10.1080/21698252.2020.1797992(In English)
Rarick, C., Winter, G., Barczyk, C. and Merkt, E. (2014). Iraqi and Kurdish cultural values in the semi-autonomous state of Kurdistan, Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 14 (3), 59-65. (In English)
Scott, M. and Tribble, C. (2006). Textual patterns: Key words and corpus analysis in language education, John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam, Netherlands. (In English)
Ucal, S. (2017). A Corpus-based study on the use of three-word lexical bundles in the academic writing by native English and Turkish non-native writers, English Language Teaching, 10 (12), 28-36. http://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n12p28(In English)
Yakut, I., Yuvayapan, F. and Bada, E. (2021). Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 English doctoral dissertations, Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 475-493. http://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP2103475Y(In English)
Yin, X. and Li, S. (2021). Lexical bundles as an intradisciplinary and interdisciplinary mark: A corpus-based study of research articles from business, biology, and applied linguistics, Applied Corpus Linguistics, 1 (1), 100006. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.acorp.2021.100006(In English)
Zare, J. and Valipouri, L. (2021). Lexical bundles in research articles in Chemistry: A structural analysis, Iranian Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10 (2), 90-105. (In English)