Discourse-Organizing Metadiscourse in ELF Academic Speech: A Corpus Study Across Speech Events
This corpus-based study examines how English as a Lingua Franca (ELF) speakers utilize metadiscourse (MD) features to structure and regulate the flow of academic spoken discourse across various speech events. It adopts Ädel’s (2022) move-based taxonomy as a framework for a genre-comparative analysis of real-time ELF academic speech events from the ELFA corpus, encompassing various types, including doctoral defense discussions, conference presentations, conference discussions, lecture discussions, and seminars. The study is grounded in a reflexive approach, treating metadiscourse as ‘discourse about ongoing discourse’ (Ädel, 2006). It focuses on discourse organizing MD features such as announcing and concluding topics, endophoric marking, enumerating, previewing, reviewing, and contextualizing. A corpus-based qualitative and quantitative analysis has been adopted, utilizing the UAM Corpus Tool for qualitative coding identifying contextualized MD functions and quantitative analysis comparing their normalized frequencies across seven event types. Our findings show substantial variation across speech events, although the strength of this variation differs by function. Lectures and presentation events show relatively high rates of prospective resources, particularly topic announcement and previewing. Previewing is relatively infrequent overall but strongly differentiated across events; Reviewing is more frequent overall but does not meet the Bonferroni-adjusted significance threshold for cross-event variation. Doctoral Defense Discussions display a hybrid profile; despite their interactive format, they have the highest normalized rate of Enumerating and substantial rates of Endophoric Marking and Contextualizing, while topic announcements and closures are comparatively rare. We argue that these patterns suggest that prospective and retrospective discourse-management resources respond differently to the structural and interactional demands of academic speech events. The results may be helpful to those working to improve the discourse management skills of students in English for Academic Purposes (EAP) settings, as well as academics involved in international conferences and research.
Can, L., Akbaş, E. (2026). Discourse-Organizing Metadiscourse in ELF Academic Speech: A Corpus Study Across Speech Events, Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, 12 (3), 80–112.
Пока никто не оставил комментариев к этой публикации.
Вы можете быть первым.
Ädel, A. (2006). Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English, John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.24(In English)
Ädel, A. (2010). Just to give you kind of a map of where we are going: A taxonomy of metadiscourse in spoken and written academic English. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9 (2), 69–97. https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.218(In English)
Ädel, A. (2012). “What I want you to remember is…”: Audience orientation in monologic academic discourse, English Text Construction, 5 (1), 69–97. https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.5.1.06ade(In English)
Ädel, A. (2022). Adopting a ‘move’ rather than a ‘marker’ approach to metadiscourse: A taxonomy for spoken student presentations, English for Specific Purposes, 69, 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2022.09.001(In English)
Ädel, A. and Mauranen, A. (2010). Metadiscourse: Diverse and divided perspectives, Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9 (2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.215(In English)
Aertselaer, J. A. and Dafouz-Milne, E. (2008). Argumentation patterns in different languages: An analysis of metadiscourse markers in English and Spanish texts, In Contrastive rhetoric: Approaches to contrastive linguistics, De Gruyter, 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110207217.1.87(In English)
Akbaş, E. (2012). Exploring metadiscourse in master’s dissertation abstracts: Cultural and linguistic variations across postgraduate writers, International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 1 (1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.7575/ijalel.v.1n.1p.12(In English)
Akbaş, E. and Hatipoğlu, Ç. (2018). Metadiscourse variations across academic genres: Rhetorical preferences in textual and interpersonal markers, Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18 (4), 767–775. (In English)
Akbaş, E., Hatipoğlu, Ç. and Bayyurt, Y. (2017). Metadiscourse in written genres: Uncovering textual and interactional aspects of texts, Peter Lang. (In English)
Bell, A. (1984). Language style as audience design, Language in Society, 13 (2), 145–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450001037X(In English)
Bernad-Mechó, E. (2024). Building successful communication in EMI contexts: A multimodal approach to organizational metadiscourse in intercultural lectures, Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 47 (2), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1515/CJAL-2024-0206(In English)
Bernad-Mechó, E. and Fortanet-Gómez, I. (2019). Organizational metadiscourse across lecturing styles: Engagement beyond language. In Engaging in the language learning process, John Benjamins, 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.301.17ber(In English)
Björkman, B. (2009). From code to discourse in spoken ELF, in A. Mauranen (Ed.), English as a lingua franca: Studies and findings, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 225–254. (In English)
Björkman, B. (2011). English as a lingua franca in higher education: Implications for EAP, Iberica, 22, 79–100. (In English)
Bondi, M. (2010). Metadiscursive practices in introductions: Phraseology and semantic sequences across genres, Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9 (2), 99–123. https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.219(In English)
Bouziri, B. (2020). Topic signaling metadiscourse devices in the Tunisian lecture corpus. ESP Today, 8 (2), 227–249. https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2020.8.2.3(In English)
Broggini, S. and Murphy, A. C. (2017). Metadiscourse in EMI lectures: Reflections on a small corpus of spoken academic discourse. L’analisi linguistica e letteraria, 25 (2 Supplement). (In English)
Cogo, A. and Dewey, M. (2012). Analysing English as a lingua franca: A corpus-driven investigation, Continuum. (In English)
Crismore, A., Markkanen, R. and Steffensen, M. (1993). Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students, Written Communication, 10 (1), 39–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088393010001002(In English)
Çiftçi, H. and Akbaş, E. (2021). Stancetaking in spoken ELF discourse in academic settings: interpersonal functions of I don’t know as a face-maintaining strategy, Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7 (1), 484–502. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.911499(In English)
Dafouz, E. and Perucha, B. (2010). Metadiscursive devices in university lectures, in Academic and professional discourse genres in Spanish, John Benjamins, 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.7.11daf(In English)
Dahl, T. (2004). Textual metadiscourse in research articles: A marker of national culture or of academic discipline?, Journal of Pragmatics, 36 (10), 1807–1825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.05.004(In English)
Dewey, M. (2009). English as a lingua franca: Heightened variability and theoretical implications, in A. Mauranen (Ed.), English as a lingua franca: Studies and findings, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 60–83. (In English)
Doiz, A. and Lasagabaster, D. (2022). Metadiscourse in English-medium instruction: Teachers’ reflections and implementation, System, 105, 102738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102738(In English)
Gnutzmann, C. and Intemann, F. (2008). Introduction: The globalisation of English. Language, politics and the English language classroom, in C. Gnutzmann and F. Intemann (Eds.), The globalisation of English and the English language classroom, Narr, 9–24. (In English)
Graddol, D. (2006). English next: Why global English might mean the end of ‘English as a foreign language’, The English Company (UK) Ltd. British Council, available at: http://www.britishcouncil.org/learning-research-english-next.pdf (Accessed 15.09.2026) (In English)
House, J. (1996). Developing pragmatic fluency in English as a foreign language: Routines and metapragmatic awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18 (2), 225–252. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100014893(In English)
House, J. (2010). The pragmatics of English as a lingua franca. In A. Trosborg (Ed.), Handbook of pragmatics, De Gruyter, 363–387. (In English)
Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing, Continuum. (In English)
Hyland, K. and Jiang, F. (2018). "In this paper we suggest": Changing patterns of disciplinary metadiscourse. English for Specific Purposes, 51, 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2018.02.001(In English)
Hyland, K. and Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25 (2), 156–177. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.156(In English)
Jenkins, J. (2009). (Un)pleasant? (In)correct? (Un)intelligible? ELF speakers’ perceptions of their accents, in A. Mauranen (Ed.), English as a lingua franca: Studies and findings, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 254–278. (In English)
Jenkins, J. (2013). English as a lingua franca in the international university: The politics of academic English language policy, Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203798157(In English)
Jiang, F. and Akbaş, E. (2024). Metadiscourse in a disciplinary context: An overview, Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 47 (2), 163–177. (In English)
Jokić, N. (2017). Metadiscourse in ELF spoken discourse of Erasmus students in Austria. AAA: Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 42 (2), 211–223. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26379472(In English)
Kashiha, H. (2022). Academic lectures versus political speeches: Metadiscourse functions affected by the role of the audience, Journal of Pragmatics, 190, 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.01.003(In English)
Kaur, J. (2009). Pre-empting problems of understanding in English as a lingua franca, in A. Mauranen (Ed.), English as a lingua franca: Studies and findings, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 107–123. (In English)
Kawase, T. (2015). Metadiscourse in the introductions of PhD theses and research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.08.004(In English)
Landis, J. R. and Koch, G. G. (1977). An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers, Biometrics, 363–374. (In English)
Lee, J. J. and Subtirelu, N. (2015). Metadiscourse in the classroom: A comparative analysis of EAP lessons and university lectures, English for Specific Purposes, 37, 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.08.005(In English)
Luukka, R. (1994). Metadiscourse in academic texts, in B. L. Gunnarsson, P. Linell and B. Nordberg (Eds.), Text and talk in professional contexts, ASLA, 77–88. (In English)
Magnucz, Á. (2012). Are you with me? A metadiscursive analysis of interactive strategies in college students’ course presentations, International Journal of English Studies, 12 (1), 55-78. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes.12.1.118281(In English)
Mauranen, A. (1993). Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Finnish-English economic text, English for Specific Purposes, 12 (1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(93)90024-I(In English)
Mauranen, A. (2001). Reflexive academic talk: Observations from MICASE. In Corpus linguistics in North America: Selections from the 1999 symposium, University of Michigan Press, 165–178. (In English)
Mauranen, A. (2005). English as lingua franca: An unknown language?, Nordic Journal of English Studies, 4 (2), 269–293. (In English)
Mauranen, A. (2006a). A rich domain of ELF: The ELFA corpus of academic discourse, Nordic Journal of English Studies, 5 (2), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.15(In English)
Mauranen, A. (2006b). Signaling and preventing misunderstanding in English as lingua franca communication, International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2006 (177), 123–150. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJSL.2006.008(In English)
Mauranen, A. (2007). Hybrid voices: English as the lingua franca of academics, in K. Fløttum (Ed.), Language and discipline perspectives on academic discourse, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 243–257. (In English)
Mauranen, A. (2009). Spoken rhetoric, in Rhetoric in detail, John Benjamins, 275–298. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.193.13mau(In English)
Mauranen, A. (2010). Discourse reflexivity: A discourse universal? The case of ELF, Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9 (2), 13–40. https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.216(In English)
Mauranen, A., Hynninen, N. and Ranta, E. (2020). English as an academic lingua franca, in J. Jenkins, W. Baker and M. Dewey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English as a lingua franca, Routledge, 200–213. (In English)
Mauranen, A. and Pérez-Llantada, C. and Swales, J. (2010). Academic Englishes: A standardised knowledge?, in English as an academic lingua franca, De Gruyter, 19–34. (In English)
Mauranen, A. and Ranta, E. (2008). English as an academic lingua franca, Nordic Journal of English Studies, 7 (3), 1–10. (In English)
McArthur, T. (2002). The Oxford guide to world English, Oxford University Press. (In English)
McEnery, T., Xiao, R. and Tono, Y. (2006). Corpus-based language studies: An advanced resource book, Routledge. (In English)
McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic, Biochemia medica, 22 (3), 276–282. (In English)
Molino, A. (2018). “What I’m speaking is almost English…”: A corpus-based study of metadiscourse in English-medium lectures at an Italian university, Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 18 (4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2018.4.0330(In English)
Mur-Dueñas, P. (2011). An intercultural analysis of metadiscourse features in research articles written in English and in Spanish, Journal of Pragmatics, 43 (12), 3068–3079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.002(In English)
O’Donnell, M. (2008). The UAM CorpusTool: Software for corpus annotation and exploration. In C. M. Bretones Callejas et al. (Eds.), Applied linguistics now: Understanding language and mind, Universidad de Almería, 1433–1447. (In English)
Penz, H. (2017). Metadiscourse in multi-party conflict talk, AAA: Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 42 (2), 301–323. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26379476(In English)
Pérez-Llantada, C. (2010). The discourse functions of metadiscourse in published academic writing: Issues of culture and language, Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9 (2), 41–68. (In English)
Pickering, L. (2006). Current research on intelligibility in English as a lingua franca, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 26, 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190506000110(In English)
Rowley-Jolivet, E. and Carter-Thomas, S. (2005). Genre awareness and rhetorical appropriacy: Manipulation of information structure by NS and NNS scientists in the international conference setting, English for Specific Purposes, 24 (1), 41–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2003.09.003(In English)
Rubio, M. M. (2011). A pragmatic approach to the macro-structure and metadiscoursal features of research article introductions in the field of agricultural sciences, English for Specific Purposes, 30 (4), 258–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.04.002(In English)
Seidlhofer, B. (2004). Research perspectives on teaching English as a lingua franca, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 209–239. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190504000145(In English)
Seidlhofer, B. (2011). Understanding English as a lingua franca, Oxford University Press.
Sifakis, N. (2014). ELF awareness as an opportunity for change: A transformative perspective for ESOL teacher education, Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 3 (2), 317–335. https://doi.org/10.1515/jelf-2014-0019(In English)
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings, Cambridge University Press. (In English)
Thompson, S. (2003). Text-structuring metadiscourse, intonation and the signalling of organisation in academic lectures, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2 (1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(02)00036-X(In English)
Vande Kopple, W. J. (1985). Some explanatory discourse on metadiscourse, College Composition and Communication, 36 (1), 82–93.
Vettorel, P. (2018). ELF and communication strategies: Are they taken into account in ELT materials? RELC Journal, 49 (1), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217746204(In English)
Warren, M. (2006). Features of naturalness in conversation, John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.152(In English)
Zare, J. and Tavakoli, M. (2015). Frequency and diversity of personal metadiscourse across monologic and dialogic modes of academic speech. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.05.003(In English)
Zhu, Y. (2018). An intercultural analysis of personal metadiscourse in English and Chinese commencement speeches. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9 (5), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.5p.100(In English)
This article is derived from the first author’s unpublished thesis under the supervision of the second author, submitted in 2025. The content has been revised and extended for the purposes of this article. We would also like to thank the Proofreading & Editing Office of the Dean for Research at Erciyes University for additional copyediting and the proofreading services that assisted with this manuscript.