DOI: 10.18413/2313-8912-2018-4-2-0-3

DISCURSIVE MARKERS AS A MEANS OF FORMING PRAGMATIC LINGUISTIC COMPETENCE

Svetlana Viktorovna Shustova
Natalia M. Tsarenko

The proposed article deals with issues related to the formation of pragmatic linguistic competence based on discursive markers. Discursive markers or discursive words have a wide pragmatic potential, function in various discourses, represent an important aspect both in the theory of communication, linguistic pragmatics, and in discourse studies. Discursive markers were fragmentarily studied in the linguo-didactic aspect. Modern foreign education suggests that language serves as a means of communication between people. For a person to be able to use a foreign language for information exchange, it is necessary to create facilities for the formation and development of a communicative competence in another language. The study is topical due to the need to study the pragmatic potential of discursive markers, their classification, to identify their prototypical and non-prototypical functions, to analyze the contexts in which these linguistic units function. The study was carried out on corpora. The object of research is the potential of discursive markers in the pragmatic linguo-didactic aspect. The subject of analysis includes the functional features of grammatical discursive markers of the English language. The analysis of discursive markers functioning resulted in the identification of pragmatic idioms (Could you ...?), modal verbs as units of speech etiquette and as syncretic discursive markers (Can...open the door?), infinitive constructions (to begin with), adverbs of certainty (definitely), and disjunctive questions (They're not actually losing much by giving to us , are they?).

Keywords: discursive marker, pragmatic linguistic competence, English language, pragmatization, discourse, lexical discourse marker, grammatical discourse marker, pragmatic potential.

Number of views: 4057 (view statistics)

Количество скачиваний: 7809

Full text (HTML)Full text (PDF)To articles list

User comments
Reference lists

While nobody left any comments to this publication.
You can be first.

Akopyants, A. M. (2008), “The fundamental principles of pragmalinguistics”, Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, Volgogradskij gosudarstvennyj social'no-pedagogicheskij universitet, Volgograd, Russia, № 9. Pp. 230-236. [in Russian].
Grebenev, A. N. and Shayuk, A. Y. (2017), “Pragmatics in the cognitive aspect”, Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, Gramota, Tambov, Russia, № 5 (71), Pp.75-80. [in Russian].
Vyatyutnev, M. N. (1977), “Communicative orientation of the Russian language teaching in foreign schools”, Russkij yazyk za rubezhom, Gosudarstvennyj institut russkogo yazyka im. A.S. Pushkina, Moscow, Russia, № 6, Pp. 38-45. [in Russian].
Kamenskiy, M. V. (2013), Diskursnye markery v svete kognitivno-diskursivnoy paradigmy [Discourse markers in the light of cognitive-discursive paradigm], ACTA LINGUISTICA, Stavropol, Russia, Vol. 7, 2, Pp. 108-119. [in Russian].
Karpova, O. P. (2015), “Formation of foreign language grammatical competence”, Nauchnaya sessiya GUAP. Sbornik dokladov, Sankt-Peterburgskij gosudarstvenny universitet aerokosmicheskogo priborostroeniya, Saint Petersburgh, Russia, S. 197–199. [in Russian].
Kibrik, A. A. (2009), Discourse markers, [Online], available at URL: http://www.philol.msu.ru/~otipl/new/main/courses/discourse/New/14-discourse-markers.pps (date of access: 18.05.2018). [in Russian].
Kozhuhova, I. V. (2015), “Pragmatic competence in a foreign language course”, Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, Chelyabinskij gosudarstvennyj universitet, Chelyabinsk, Russia, № 27 (382), Pp. 96-100. [in Russian].
Milrud, R. P. (2003), “Competence in language education”, Vestnik tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: gumanitarnye nauki.: Izdatel'stvo: Tambovskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet imeni G.R. Derzhavina, Tambov, Russia, №2(30), Pp. 100-106. [in Russian].
Milrud, R. P. (2017), “Communicative competence as readiness of students to communicate in a foreign language”, Yazyk i kultura, Nacional'nyj issledovatel'skiy Tomskiy gosudarstvenny universitet, Tomsk, Russia, № 38, Pp. 250-268. [in Russian].
Padey, E. V. (2013), “Psychological and pedagogical research of formation of communicative competence at the initial stage of foreign language teaching”, Molodoy ucheny, OOO «Molodoyucheny», Kazan, Russia, № 2, Pp. 388-390. [in Russian].
Aijmer, K. and Simon-Vandenbergen, A.-M. (2009), “Pragmatic markers”, Handbook of Pragmatics, John Benjamins Amsterdam, Philadelphia, P.1–29.
Bachman, L. (1990), Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing, Oxford University Press, Oxford , UK.
Canale, M. (1988), The measurement of communicative competence. Annual review of applied linguistics, Georgetown University, Georgetown, UK, Vol.8, P. 67–84.
Canale, M. and Swaine, М. (1980), “Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing”, Applied Linguistics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, № 1. Р. 47–54.
Chomsky, N. (1965), Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, UK.
Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 2001.
Fraser, B. (1996), “Pragmatic markers”, Pragmatics, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, Netherlands, No. 6(2). P. 167–190.
Halliday, М. А. К. (1975), Learning How to Mean: Explorations in the Development of Language, Edward Arnold, London , UK.
Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (1976), Cohesion in English, Longman, London, UK.
Hymes, D. (1972), On Communicative Competence: Sociolinguistics. / J.B. Pride and J. Holmes (eds.), Penguin, Harmondsworth , UK, P. 269-293.
Leech, G. N. (1983), Principles of Pragmatics, Longman, London, UK.
McCarthy M. (1991), Discourse analysis for language teachers, University press Publishing, Cambridge, UK.
McNamara, T. F. (1996), Measuring second language performance, Longman, London, UK.
Savignon, S. J. (1997), Communicative Competence: Theory and Classroom Practice. 2nd ed.,McGraw-Hill, New York , USA.
Schiffrin, D. (1987), Discourse Markers, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge , UK.
Thomas, J. (2013), Meaning in interaction: an introduction to pragmatics,Routledge, London, UK.
Van Ek, J. A. (1986), Objectives for foreign language learning, Volume 2, Council of Europe, Strasbourg , France.
Widdowson, H. G. (1978), Teaching language as communication, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

All journals

Send article

Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics is included in the scientific database of the RINTs (license agreement No. 765-12/2014 dated 08.12.2014).

Журнал включен в перечень рецензируемых научных изданий, рекомендуемых ВАК

The journal is indexed by the following scientific databases and platforms

Research Result. Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics (ISSN 2313-8912)

The journal materials and website are licensed under Creative Commons «Attribution» 4.0 International.

The Founder: Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education "Belgorod National Research University"The Founder’s address: 85 Pobedy Street, Belgorod, the Belgorod region, 308015, Russia

The Publisher: Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of HigherEducation "Belgorod National Research University" The Founder’s address:85 Pobedy Street, Belgorod, the Belgorod region, 308015, Russia

Editors Office: chief editor Olga Dekhnich, e-mail: RR_Linguistics@bsu.edu.ru, phone: (4722) 301254.

Registered by the Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technology and Mass Media (Roskomnadzor)

Certificate

Have questions?
You can write to us:

✉ Content manager

✉ Site administration

✉ Executive Secretary