Online medical discourse during the COVID-19 pandemic: semantic categories and attitudes
The paper presents the results of the discourse, semantic and sentiment analysis of the medical professional forum publications. Computer-mediated communication (CMC) within the professional community on the portal MirVracha reveals a diversity of peculiarities of medical professional discourse since the portal includes informal posts and chats alongside official and scientific publications. We study materials of MirVracha published in summer 2020 – winter 2021 (dataset includes more than 0.5 million words). We reveal dominant semantic categories of online medical professional discourse and examine the dynamic of topics discussed in the publications against the backdrop of the pandemic situation and social events. The dominant semantic categories of online medical professional discourse during the COVID-19 pandemic are the Diagnosis and Research categories. Based on the results of discourse analysis, we describe the interests and attitudes of the portal users and linguistic means they use to verbalize their attitudes within the professional community. The medical professionals are primarily interested in research materials and outcomes. Based on sentiment analysis, we uncover attitudes revealed in the publications. Medical professional CMC shows mainly neutral attitudes to the topics. In the posts and personal narratives, the portal users discuss political context and express the negative attitude in posts associated with semantic Diagnosis and Bureaucracy categories.
Ovchinnikova, I. G., Ermakova, L. M. and Nurbakova, D. M. (2022). Online medical discourse during the COVID-19 pandemic: semantic categories and attitudes, Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, 8 (1), 57-78. DOI: 10.18413/2313-8912-2022-8-1-0-4
While nobody left any comments to this publication.
You can be first.
Abd-Alrazaq, A., Alhuwail, D., Househ, M., Hamdi, M. and Shah, Z. (2020). Top Concerns of Tweeters During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Infoveillance Study, Journal of Medical Internet Resources, 22(4):e19016, April, available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32287039/ (Accessed 20 February 2022). https://doi.org/10.2196/19016 (In English)
Akhnina, K. V. and Kurilenko, V. B. (2015). Medical net-discourse: essence, qualities, structure, Polylinguality and Transcultural Practices, 1, 76-84. (In Russian)
Akhnina, K. V., Makarova, M. A. and Yurmanova, S. A. (2018). Network medical discourse: lexical and stylistic features, Online scientific & educational Bulletin “Health and Education Millennium”, 20 (6), 48–53. https://dx.doi.org/10.26787/nydha-2226-7417-2018-20-6-48-53(In Russian)
Alnashwan, R., Sorensen, H., O’Riordan, A. and Hoare, C. (2019). Accurate classification of socially generated medical discourse, International Journal of Data Science and Analytics, 8(4), 353–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41060-018-0128-8(In English)
Arkhipova, A. S., Radchenko, D. А., Kozlova, I. V., Peigin, B. S., Gavrilova, M. V. and Petrov, N. V. (2020). Specifics of Infodemic in Russia: From WhatsApp to the Investigative Committee, Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 6, 231–265. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2020.6.1778(In Russian)
Bogomiagkova, E. S. and Iskanderova, L. V. (2020). Interaction between doctors and patients on medical forums: Analysis of Discourse Practices, Internet and Modern Society: proceedings of the conference IMS-2020, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 22–24, available at: https://ojs.itmo.ru/index.php/IMS/article/view/1134 (Accessed 20 February 2022). (In Russian)
Bordignon, F., Ermakova, L. and Noel, M. (2021). Over-Promotion and Caution in Abstracts of Preprints during the COVID-19 Crisis, Learned Publishing, 34(4) 622–636. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1411(In English)
Caulfield, T., Marcon, A. R., Murdoch, B., Brown, J. M., Perrault, S. T., Jarry, J. ... and Hyde-Lay, R. (2019). Health misinformation and the power of narrative messaging in the public sphere, Canadian Journal of Bioethics/Revue canadienne de bioéthique, 2(2), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.7202/1060911ar(In English)
De Haes, H. and Bensing, J. (2009). Endpoints in medical communication research, proposing a framework of functions and outcomes, Patient education and counselling, 74(3), 287–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2008.12.006(In English)
Denecke, K. and Deng, Y. (2015). Sentiment analysis in medical settings: New opportunities and challenges, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 64(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2015.03.006 (In English)
Ermakova, L., Nurbakova, D. and Ovchinnikova, I. (2021). Analysis of Users Engaged in Online Discussions about Controversial Covid-19 Treatments, Adjunct Proceedings of the 29th ACM Conference on User Modelling, Adaptation and Personalization 2021, June, Utrecht, Netherlands, 162–166. https://doi.org/10.1145/3450614.3462239(In English)
Ferguson, W. J. and Candib, L. M. (2002). Culture, language, and the doctor-patient relationship, Family medicine, 24, 353–361. (In English)
Franz, B. and Murphy, J. W. (2018). Reconsidering the role of language in medicine, Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 13(1), June. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13010-018-0058-z (Accessed 20 February 2022). (In English)
Goeuriot, L., Na, J.-Ch., Kyaing, W. Y. M., Khoo, Ch., Chang, Y.-K., Theng Y.-L. and Kim, J.-J. (2012). Sentiment lexicons for health-related opinion mining, Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGHIT International Health Informatics Symposium, IHI ’12, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1145/2110363.2110390 (In English)
Good, B. J. and Del Vecchio Good, M.-J. (1981). The semantics of medical discourse, in Mendelson, E. and Elkana, Y. (eds.), Sciences and Cultures, Anthropological and Historical Studies of the Science, Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 177–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8429-5(In English)
Habermas, J. (1970). Technology and science as ‘ideology’, in Habermas, J. (ed.), Towards a Rational Sociaty: Student Protest, Science, and Politics, trans. Shapiro, J. J, Beacon, Boston, USA, 79–126. https://www.sfu.ca/~andrewf/technology_and_science_as_ideology.pdf (Accessed 2 February 2022) (In English)
Heritage, J. and Maynard, D. W. (2006). Problems and prospects in the study of physician-patient interaction: 30 years of research, Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 351–374. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.32.082905.093959(In English)
Khan, M. (2019). The perspective of medical communication on the biomedical model of practice and patient centeredness: A review of the language of medical case presentation genre, International Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Translation, 2, 71–80. (In English)
Kharitonova, N. V., Baryshnikova, S. N. and Monastyretskay O. V. (2019). Peculiarity of lexical component of professionally oriented discourse in the internet (based on medical forum), Philology. Theory and Practice, 12, 331–334. https://doi.org/10.30853/filnauki.2019.3.70(In Russian)
Kuipers, J. C. (1989). Medical discourse in anthropological context: Views of language and power, Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 3(2), 99–123. https://doi.org/10.1525/maq.1989.3.2.02a00010 (In English)
Molek-Kozakowska, K. (2017). Communicating environmental science beyond academia: Stylistic patterns of newsworthiness in popular science journalism, Discourse & Communication, 11(1), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481316683294(In English)
Nugumanov, E., Loukachevitch, N. and Dobrov, B. (2021). Extracting Sentiments towards COVID-19 Aspects, Supplementary 23rd International Conference on Data Analytics and Management in Data Intensive Domains, DAMDID/RCDL 2021, Moscow, Russia, 299–312. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3036/paper24.pdf (Accessed 10 February 2022) (In English)
Nye, B., L., Junyi, J., Patel, R., Yang, Y., Marshall, I., Nenkova, A. and Wallace, B. (2018). A corpus with multi-level annotations of patients, interventions and outcomes to support language processing for medical literature, Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), Association for Computational Linguistics, Melbourne, Australia, 197–207. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P18-1019 (In English)
Ovchinnikova, I. G., Ermakova, L. M. and Nurbakova, D. M. (2021). Who Needs the Red Pill: Hydroxychloroquine Wars on Twitter, Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 6, 566–583. https:// doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2021.6.1981 (In Russian)
Ovchinnikova, I., Ermakova, L. and Nurbakova, D. (2020). Sentiments in Russian Medical Professional Discourse during the Covid-19 Pandemic, Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Computational Modeling of People's Opinions, Personality, and Emotion's in Social Media. Barcelona, Spain, 99–108. (In English)
Severskaya, O. I. (2020). Covidiots on Coronacation: Coronaviral Lexicon as a Diagnostic Field of Discursive Practices, Communication studies, 7 (4), 887–906. https://doi.org/10.24147/2413-6182.2020.7.(4). 887-906 (In Russian)
Sheaff, R., Halliday, J., Byng, R., Øvretveit, J., Exworthy, M., Peckham, S. and Asthana, S. (2017). Bridging the discursive gap between lay and medical discourse in care coordination, Sociology of health & illness, 39(7), 1019–1034. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12553 (In English)
Shuravina, L. S. (2013). Medical discourse as a type of institutional discourse, Herald of Chelyabinsk State University. Philology, Art History, 37 (328), 86, 65–67. (In Russian)
Silletti, A. M. (2016). The role of illustrations in popularizing medical discourse, Linguæ &-Rivista di lingue e culture modern, 14(2), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.7358/ling-2015-002-sill(InEnglish)
Torshin, I. Yu., Gromova, O. A., Stakhovskaya, L. V., Vanchakova, N. P., Galustyan, A. N., Kobalava, Zh. D., Grishina,
T. R., Gromov, A. N., Ilovaiskaya, I. A., Kodentsova, V. M., Kalacheva, A. G., Limanova, O. A., Maksimov, V. A., Malyavskaya, S. I., Mozgovaya, E. V., Tapilskaya, N. I., Rudakov, K. V. and Semenov V. A. (2020). Analysis of 19.9 million publications of the PubMed/MEDLINE database using artificial intelligence methods: approaches to the generalizations of accumulated data and to the phenomenon of “fake news”, FARMAKOEKONOMIKA, Farmakoekonomika. Modern Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmacoepidemiology, 13 (2), 146–163. https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909/farmakoekonomika.2020.021(In Russian)
Varnavskaya, E. V. (2019). Network Medical Discourse in blogosphere: Sociolect and peculiarity of communication online, Scientific and methodological e-journal Concept, available at: https://e-koncept.ru/en/tag/network+medical+discourse (Accessed 9 January 2022). (In Russian)
Waitzkin, H. (1989). A critical theory of medical discourse: ideology, social control, and the processing of social context in medical encounters, Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 30(2), 220–239. https://doi.org/2137015 (In English)
Wilce, J. M. (2009). Medical discourse, Annual Review of Anthropology, 38(1), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-091908-164450(In English)
Yadav, Sh., Ekbal, A., Saha, S. and Bhattacharyya, P. (2018). Medical sentiment analysis using social media: Towards building a patient assisted system, Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018), European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Miyazaki, Japan, 2791–2797. (In English)
Yus, F. (2018). Attaching Feelings and Emotions to Propositions. Some Insights on Irony and Internet Communication, Russian Journal of Linguistics, 22 (1), 94–107. https://doi.org/10.22363/2312- 9182-2018-22-1-94-107(In English)
Zunic, A., Corcoran, P. and Spasic, I. (2020). Sentiment analysis in health and well-being: Systematic review, JMIR Medical Informatics, 8(1):e16023, January, available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32012057/ (Accessed 20 February 2022). (In English)