Modeling of text and discourse worlds
The article deals with the author’s algorithm for modeling both text and discourse worlds. The importance of modeling in the contemporary linguistic paradigm is proved. The model of the text world is interpreted as a combination of three components, such as: (1) the literary conceptual domain, (2) the readers’ conceptual domains, (3) the interpretive field of the text world model. The model of the discourse world is interpreted as a triad of components such as: (1) the literary conceptual domain, (2) the conceptual domains of communicants, (3) the communicative situation of the informative’s existing. The specific features of each component’s architectonics in the models of both text and discourse worlds are revealed. Particular attention is drawn to concepts-dominants in the conceptual domain of the informative as the architectonics’ part in the models of both text and discourse worlds. The significance of cognitive attractors in the conceptual domain of the informative is emphasised. A close relationship is established between the informative’s conceptual domain and reader’s conceptual domain. The relationship of two components in the worlds models is realised by cognitive attractors. It is determined that the third component in both text and discourse worlds models is fundamentally different from each other. In the model of the text world, there is a mental interpretative projection as the third component’s architectonics. In the model of the discourse world, there is an extralinguistic reality as the third component’s architectonics. The high verification coefficient of author’s algorithm for modeling both text and discourse worlds are substantiated.
Ogneva, E. A., Stepanova, L. and Chikovani, T. V. (2022). Modeling of text and discourse worlds, Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, 8 (1), 79-92. DOI: 10.18413/2313-8912-2022-8-1-0-5
While nobody left any comments to this publication.
You can be first.
Alefirenko, N. F., Chumak-Zhun, I. I., Ozerova, E. G. and Stebunova, K. K. (2015). Text and discourse: between Scylla and Charybdis of cognitive linguopoetics, Journal of Language and Literature, 6, 2, 157-160. https://doi.org/10.7813/jll.2015/6-2/31 (In English)
Alefirenko, N., Gigolayeva, A., Dekhnich, O. and Chumak-Zhun’, I. (2019). Discursive-Pragmatic Modeling of the Language Image, Amazonia Investiga, 8, 21, 142-149. (In English)
Baghana, J., Buzina, E. I., Glamazda, S. N., Khvesko, T. V. and Lazareva, O. P. (2019). Literary text as knowledge format, Journal of research in Applied Linguistics, 10 (Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Applied Linguistics Issues (ALI 2019) July 19-20, 2019, Saint Petersburg, Russia), 1186-1196. https://doi.org/10.22055/rals.2019.15200 (In English)
Belousov, К. I. (2010). Modeling linguistics and lingual reality’s modeling issues, Bulletin of Omsk State University, 11 (117), 94-97. (In Russian)
Boldyrev, N. N. (2019). The dominant principle of meaning construction in mind and discourse, in Nolan, B. and Diedrichsen, E. (eds.), Linguistic Perspectives on the Construction of Meaning and Knowledge, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 85-104. (In English)
Boldyrev, N. N. (2020). The interpretive dominant in the cognitive theory of language, in Pavlova, A. (ed.), Philological Readings, 83. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, European Publisher, London, UK, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2020.04.02.1(InEnglish)
Bolotnova, N. S. (1992). Hudozhestvennyjtekstvkommunikativnomaspekteikompleksnyjanalizedinicleksicheskogourovnya [Literary text in communicative aspect and complex analysis of lexical level’s units], Тomsk State University, Tomsk, Russia. (In Russian)
Butakova, L. О. and Myachin, K. A. (2020). The component composition of the conceptual category “memory” and its role in the meaning formation of contemporary prose texts, Philological Class, 25, 3, 85-99. (In Russian).https://doi.org/10.26170/FK20-03-07(In English)
Enpeng, Y., Guoqing, Zh., Ou, J., Shenghua, B., Kailong, Ch., Zhong, S. and Yong, Y. (2014). Probabilistic text modeling with orthogonalized topics, SIGIR'14:Proceedings of the 37th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research & development in information, 907-910. https://doi.org/10.1145/2600428.2609471(In English)
Epifanceva, N. G. (2018). Realities and their place in the language world view, The evolution of the Romance languages: from the language of the people to the language of the nation, Moscow, Russia, 188-193. (In Russian)
Fedotova, О. С. (2021) Printsipy konstruirovaniya angloyazychnogo khudozhestvennogo narrativa (k probleme diskursa i metadiskursa hudozhestvennoj prozy) [Principles of constructing an English-language literary narrative (about issue of both discourse and meta-discourse of prose)], Perspectiva, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)
Golovanova, E. I. and Kovaleva, O. N. (2017). Cognitive mechanisms of evaluative meaning compression in a literary text, Issues of Cognitive Linguistics, 3 (52), 31-36. https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2017-3-31-36(In Russian)
Huxley, O. (2006). Brave New World, Harper Perennial, London, UK. (In English)
Karasik, V. I. (2013). Jazykovaja matritsa kul'tury [Lingual Matrix of Culture], Gnozis, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)
Karasik, V. I. (2020). Jazykovye kartiny bytija [Language view of being], Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)
Khvesko, T. V. and Tretyakova, S. Yu. (2019). Linguistic and pragmatic aspect of anthroponyms in a literary text, Onomastics of the Volga Region, Proceedings of the XVII International Scientific Conference, Ural Institute of Humanities, Ekaterinbourg, Russia, 522-526. https://doi.org/10.34680/2019.onomastics.5(In Russian)
Koval’, V. I., Kurash, S. B. and Amatov, A. N. (2019). “Text in the world of texts” as a global metaphor (intertext - hypertext - corpus of texts), Research Result. Issues of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, 5, 1, 3-12. https://doi.org/10.18413/2313-8912-2019-5-1-0-1(In Russian)
Kurash, S. B. (2001). Metafora i ejo predely: mikrokontekst – tekst – intertekst [Metaphor and its limits: microcontext - text - intertext], Mozir’, Belarus. (In Russian)
Kushneruk, S. L. (2012). Discourse and text worlds: possibility of level stratification of discourse, Political linguistics, 2 (40), 93-101. (In Russian)
Kushneruk, S. L. (2017). From the text worlds theory to the theory of cognitive-discursive world-modeling: crystallization of the research field, Cognitive studies of language, 30, 269-272. (In Russian)
Levchenko, M. N., Elisseeva, A. A., Elistratova, I. V., Zakharova, M. Yu., Kazarina, M. A. and Tarasova, O. I. (2013). Interpretacija teksta i ego grammaticheskih modeleĭ (tipologicheskiĭ aspekt) [Interpretation of the text and its grammatical models (typological aspect)], Moscow State Regional University, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)
Maslakova, T. P. (2010). Linguo-sociocultural text modeling in the educational sphere, Language, science and technology in modern intercultural space, Proceedings of the International Conference to 35th anniversary of the faculty “International”, Don State Technical University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia, 42-46. (In Russian)
Ogneva, E. A. (2009). Kognitivnoe modelirovanie konceptosfery hudozhestvennogo teksta [Cognitive modeling of the literary conceptual domain], BSU, Belgorod, Russia. (In Russian)
Ogneva, E. A., Danilenko, I. A., Kireeva, Y. I. and Kutsenko, A. A. (2015) Interpretative model of linguacultural knowledge, The Social Sciences, 10, 6, 1101-1106. (In English)
Piotrovsky, R. G. (1998). Modeling in linguistics, Issues of Romance and General Linguistic, 86-96. (In Russian)
Saint John (Maximovich), Archbishop of Shanghai and San Francisco. Words and sermons [Online], available at:https://azbyka.ru/otechnik/Ioann_Maksimovich/slova-i-propovedi/ (Accessed 11 January 2022). (In English)
Semino, E. (1997). Language and World Creation in Poems and Other Texts. Longan. L., and N.Y., UK, USA. (In English)
Semino, E. (2000). A Cognitive Stylistic Approach to Mind Style in Narrative Fiction. Cognitive Stylistics, in Semino, E. and Culpeper, J. (eds.), Language and Cognition in Text Analysis, John Benjamins, Amsterdam; Philadelphia, Holland, USA, 95-122. (In English)
Shatalova, O. V. (2012). Syntactic modeling of a journalistic text as a method of pragmalinguistics, Bulletin of ChelGU. Philology and art history, 2 (256), 62, 140-142. (In Russian)
Shchirova, I. A. (2013). Tekst skvoz’ prizmu slozhnogo [Text through the lens of complexity], Polytechnic-Service, Saint Petersburg, Russia. (In Russian)
Shtof, V. A. (1966). Modelirovanie i filosofiya. [Modeling and philosophy], Science, Moscow, Leningrad, Russia. (In Russian)
Tataru, L. V. (2008). Compositional Rhythm and Cognitive Logic of Narrative Text (collection of J. Joyce “Dubliners”), Izvestiya of
Russian State Pedagogical University named after A.I. Herzen, 75, 23-37. (In Russian)
Wenyin, L. Quan, X., Feng, M. and Qui, B. (2010). A Information Sciences, 180, 20, 15 October, 4031-4041. [Online], available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0020025510002823 (Accessed 24 December 2021). (In English)
Werth, P. (1999). Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. Longman, London, United Kingdom. (In English)
Zhirova, I. G. (2020). The utterance’s structure and the system of linguistic communication means: based on the contemporary fictions, Research Result. Issues of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, 6, 3, 85-98. https://doi.org/10.18413/2313-8912-2020-6-3-0-7 (In Russian)
Zinchenko, Ya. R. (2009). Causal-genetic modeling of the text in the aspect of socio-political communication’s teaching foreign languages, Intercultural Communication and Professionally Oriented Teaching Foreign Languages: Proceedings of the III International Conference Dedicated to the 88th Anniversary of the Belarusian State University, 53-57. (In Russian)