Wordiness in academic writing: a systematic scoping review
Background: Excessive use of empty words in academic texts is a significant impediment to effective communication, often complicating the clarity and reducing the comprehensibility of scholarly writing. Purpose: This systematic scoping review investigates the nature, causes, and consequences of excessive use of empty words, alongside strategies for mitigating this issue in academic writing, differentiating between the nuanced connotations of ‘verbosity’ and ‘wordiness’. Methods: Employing a detailed search strategy, the review engaged two electronic databases – Scopus and Google Scholar, initially identifying 256 studies. Employing the PRISMA-ScR protocol and the ‘PCC’ mnemonic (Population, Context, Concept) for inclusion and exclusion criteria, 30 English-language studies directly addressing the excessive use of empty words and strategies for reduction were included. Results: The synthesis of the selected research revealed that while the excessive use of empty words is widely recognized as a challenge for authors and academics, the problem remains underexplored. The analysis clarified the distinction between ‘verbosity’ and ‘wordiness’– terms often used interchangeably but with distinct implications for academic writing. Key factors contributing to this issue include complex sentence structures, unnecessary nominalizations, and the use of redundant phrases or overly complex vocabulary. Effective strategies for reducing excessive wordiness involve simplifying sentence constructions, employing more direct language, eliminating redundancy, and strategically using verbosity for positive rhetorical effects. Conclusion: The review emphasises the importance of awareness and strategic management of empty word usage in academic texts to enhance readability and engagement. By adopting a critical approach to the elimination of unnecessary verbiage, authors can significantly improve the quality of academic writing.
Figures
Tikhonova, E. V. and Mezentseva, D. A. (2024). Wordiness in academic writing: a systematic scoping review, Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, 10 (1), 133-157. DOI: 10.18413/2313-8912-2024-10-1-0-8
While nobody left any comments to this publication.
You can be first.
Abdollahi-Guilani, M., Mirzaeifard, S., Aghaei, K. and Khojastehrad, S. (2012). Clashes of Conciseness and Wordiness between English and Persian Verbs, Asian Social Science, 8 (10). https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n10p118(In English)
Abdul-Raof, H. (2006). Arabic Rhetoric: A Pragmatic Analysis, Routledge, London, UK https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203965399(In English)
Aziz, S., Kashif, M. and Aijaz, M. (2016). English Grammar Problems Seen in the Original Articles Submitted for Publication in Annals of Abbasi Shaheed Hospital and Karachi Medical and Dental College, Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons–Pakistan, 26 (8), 681–684. (In English)
Barrass, R. (1996). Scientists must write: A guide to better writing for scientists, engineers and students, Chapman and Hall, London and New York, England. (In English)
Baxter, G. and Neumann, H. B. (2023). Source-based writing of the high- and low-proficiency adolescent writer in the high-school L2 classroom, Journal of Second Language Writing, 62, 101064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101064(In English)
Bianco, A. (2024). The Subtle Meaning an Outline of Persian ʿilm-imaʿānī: An Outline of Persian ʿilm-imaʿānī, Edizioni. https://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-781-4(In English)
Boumeddane, L. (2021). Techniques against the Tendency of Students for Verbosity in Written English, Al-Athar, Special Issue (2021), 74-81. (In English)
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa(In English)
Brohaugh, W. (2007). Write Tight: Say Exactly What You Mean with Precision and Power (1st ed.), Sourcebooks. (In English)
Chigbu, G. U., Emelogu, N. U., Egbe, C. I., Okoyeukwu, N. G., Eze, K. O., Nwafor, C. K., Patrick, C. P., Okon, E. O., Agbo, P. A. and Amunabo, F. A. (2023). Enhancing ESL students’ academic achievement in expository essay writing using digital graphic organisers: A mixed-methods research, Heliyon, 9 (5), e15589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15589(In English)
Cleaveland, M. C. and Larkins, E. R. (2004). Web-based practice and feedback improve tax students’ written communication skills, Journal of Accounting Education, 22 (3), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2004.08.001(In English)
Cui, Y., Jin, H. and Gao, Y. (2023). Developing EFL teachers’ feedback literacy for research and publication purposes through intra- and inter-disciplinary collaborations: A multiple-case study, Assessing Writing, 57, 100751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100751 (In English)
Demir, C. (2019). Writing Intelligible English Prose: Conciseness vs. Verbosity, SöylemFilolojiDergisi, 4 (2), 482-505. https://doi.org/10.29110/soylemdergi.617184(In English)
Dulek, R. (1982). To Question or Not to Question: A Study of Wordiness and Impact, Business Communication Quarterly, 45 (1), 11–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/108056998204500106(In English)
Eisenberg, A. (1984). Effective writing in science, TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 3 (6), IV–VI. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-9936(84)88002-4(In English)
Every, B. (2017). Writing economically in medicine and science: Tips for tackling wordiness, Medical Writing, 26, 17-20. (In English)
Fruehwald, E. S. (2010). Exercises for Legal Writers II: Editing for Wordiness, SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1704045(In English)
Goonaratna, C. (2002a). Writing well (6) Wordiness, alias verbosity, Ceylon Medical Journal, 47 (1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.4038/cmj.v47i1.6393(In English)
Goonaratna, C. (2002b). Writing well (7) Wordiness alias verbosity, continued, Ceylon Medical Journal, 47 (3), 79-80. https://doi.org/10.4038/cmj.v47i3.3432(In English)
Graham, J. (1965). Wordiness: Toward a Solution, CLA Journal, 8 (3), 284–289. (In English)
Greavu, A. (2019). An Overview of Business Writing: Challenges and Solutions, Studies in Business and Economics, 14, 60-71. https://doi.org/10.2478/sbe-2019-0005(In English)
Guzmán, F., Nakov, P. and Vogel, S. (2015). Analysing Optimization for Statistical Machine Translation: MERT Learns Verbosity, PRO Learns Length, Proceedings of the Nineteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, Association for Computational Linguistics, Beijing, China, 62–72). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/K15-1007(In English)
Haghani, M. (2023). What makes an informative and publication-worthy scientometric analysis of literature: A guide for authors, reviewers and editors, Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 22, 100956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2023.100956(In English)
Hamid, S. A. (2013). Syntactic Problems of Translating English Wordiness into Arabic, Surra Man Ra’a, 9 (33), 363-377, available at: https://www.iasj.net/iasj/article/83975 (Accessed 13 January 2024). (In English)
Hicks, N. M. and Douglas, K. A. (2018). Efforts to Improve Undergraduate Grader Consistency: A Qualitative Analysis. Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--30366(In English)
Ibrahim, M., Usman, A. and Ali, M. (2014). Qur’anic Brevity and Verbosity: What and How?, Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n20p1939(In English)
Imani, A. and Habil, H. (2012). NNS Postgraduate Students’ Academic Writing: Problem-solving Strategies and Grammatical features, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 66, 460–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.290(In English)
Khalifa, M. and Albadawy, M. (2024). Using Artificial intelligence in academic writing and research: an essential productivity tool, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update, 100145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpbup.2024.100145(In English)
Langan, J. (2008). College writing skills with readings (7th ed), McGraw-Hill. (In English)
Li, Y. (2022). Book review, Assessing Writing, 51, 100598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100598(In English)
Linnehan, F. (2001).The relation of a Work-Based Mentoring program to the academic performance and behavior of African American students, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59 (3), 310–325. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1810(In English)
Malik, A. R., Pratiwi, Y., Andajani, K., Numertayasa, I. W., Suharti, S., Darwis, A. and Marzuki, M. (2023). Exploring Artificial Intelligence in Academic Essay: Higher Education Student’s perspective, International Journal of Educational Research Open, 5, 100296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100296(In English)
Martin, S., Rhodes, A., Brill, C. D. and Sandoz, E. K. (2022). Diversity-related factors in research mentorship and publishing in the ACBS community and the Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 26, 56–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2022.08.009(In English)
Mikelonis, V. M. and Constantinides, H. (2005). Editorial smarts: Contextual and single sentence editing tools, IPCC 2005.Proceedings. International Professional Communication Conference, Limerick, Ireland, 151-160. https://doi.org/10.1109/ipcc.2005.1494172(In English)
Ou, W. A., Stöhr, C. and Malmström, H. (2024). Academic communication with AI-powered language tools in higher education: From a post-humanist perspective, System, 121, 103225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103225(In English)
Piel, S. and Schuchart, C. (2014). Social origin and success in answering mathematical word problems: The role of everyday knowledge, International Journal of Educational Research, 66, 22-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2014.02.003(In English)
Pinheiro, D. L., Melkers, J. and Youtie, J. (2014). Learning to play the game: Student publishing as an indicator of future scholarly success, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 81, 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.09.008(In English)
Prasetyo, Y. (2015). Sentence Conciseness in Thesis Abstracts of English Department Students, JurnalEdukasi, 1 (1), 71-80. (In English)
Provost, G. (2019). 100 Ways to Improve Your Writing: Proven Professional Techniques for Writing with Style and Power, Penguin. (In English)
Raitskaya, L. and Tikhonova, E. (2022). An In-Depth Glimpse into Research on Academic Writing, Journal of Language and Education, 8 (2), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2022.14586(In English)
Rodríguez, E., Mazzola, M. S. and Fankhauser, S. C. (2022). No Science Fair? No Problem. Engaging Students in Science Communication through Peer Review and Publication in a Remote World, Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education, 23 (1). https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00146-21(In English)
Śleszyńska, M. (2021). How to Write (Science) Better. Simplified English Principles in a Skill-Oriented ESP Course, Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 66, 115-133. https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2021-0008(In English)
Stott, R. and Avery, S. (eds.) (2001). Writing with style, Longman. (In English)
Strobl, C., Ailhaud, É., Benetos, K., Devitt, A., Kruse, O., Proske, A. and Rapp, C. (2019). Digital support for academic writing: A review of technologies and pedagogies, Computers and Education, 131, 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.12.005(In English)
Tikhonova, E. V. (2023). Academic Search Engine Optimization: Improving visibility and accessibility of scientific publications, Science Editor and Publisher, 8 (1), 18-27. https://doi.org/10.24069/SEP-23-15(In English)
Tikhonova, E., Kosycheva, M. and Kasatkin, P. (2023a). Exploring Academic Culture: Unpacking its Definition and Structure (A Systematic Scoping Review), Journal of Language and Education, 9 (4), 151-162. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2023.18491(In English)
Tikhonova, E. V., Kosycheva, M. A. and Golechkova, T. Yu. (2023b). Establishing Rapport with the Reader: Engagement Markers in the Discussion Section of a Research Article, Integration of Education, 27 (3), 354–372. https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.112.027.202303.354-372(In English)
Zhu, Y., Kim, D., Jiang, T., Zhao, Y., He, J., Chen, X. and Lou, W. (2024). Dependency, reciprocity, and informal mentorship in predicting long-term research collaboration: A co-authorship matrix-based multivariate time series analysis, Journal of Informetrics, 18 (1), 101486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2023.101486(In English)
Çakir, A., Kuyurtar, D. and Balyer, A. (2024). The effects of the publish or perish culture on publications in the field of educational administration in Türkiye, Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 9, 100817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100817(In English)