Numeric Domain Names and National Domains: Trends in Internet Onomastics
The research paper provides an analysis of the Internet domain naming system, in particular, a study on numeric domain names and national domains. In the Internet space, various signs and symbols from different semiotic systems can be used. One interesting finding is that the use of hieroglyphic, Cyrillic and numeric domain names in the Internet space is becoming a distinct trend. Hieroglyphic and numeric domain names, in particular, can play an important role in addressing the issue of Internet onomastics. From this perspective, Chinese domain names have provided a natural bridge point for Internet technology, Chinese traditional culture, modern and traditional industries. The research material consists of domain names of Internet websites. The aim of our study is to describe the development strategy of hieroglyphic and numeric domain names from a linguistic point of view. The relevance of the study is determined by the limited exploration of onomastics in virtual realities. Domain names serve as identifiers and means of communication. It is essential to keep in mind that the domain naming is a dynamic phenomenon, and trends in domain naming can change over time. Additionally, the value of a domain name is often subjective and depends on factors like brandability, memorability and market demand. The research identifies trends in Internet onomastics of domain names, that can be exemplified by the use of hieroglyphs and numerical codes in Chinese internet space. Special attention is given to domains where the creative function of language is evident in their creation.
Figures
Dubinina, M. N. (2024). Numeric Domain Names and National Domains: Trends in Internet Onomastics, Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, 10 (3), 26-41.
While nobody left any comments to this publication.
You can be first.
Abdullaeva, M. Z. (2020). Spiritual role of Islamic media space in domain “uz”, Bulletin Social-Economic and Humanitarian Research, 8 (10), 55-62. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4117558(In English)
Akhrenova, N. A., Dubinina, M. N. (2022). The role of numbers in the Chinese cyberculture, Topical Issues of Linguistics and Teaching Methods in Business and Professional Communication – TILTM 2022: Proceedings of the X International Research Conference Topical Issues of Linguistics and Teaching Methods in Business and Professional Communication, 16–23. https://doi.org/10.15405/epes.22104.3(In English)
An, Zh. (2002). Wǎngluò shùzì xiéyīn cíyǔ qiǎn lùn [A brief discussion on homophonic words for digital numbers on the Internet]. Journal of Taiyuan University. 3 (4), 36–38. (In Chinese)
Arsène, S. (2015). Internet Domain Names in China: Articulating Local Control with Global Connectivity. China Perspectives, 2015 (4), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.4000/chinaperspectives.6846(In English)
Barinova, D. S. (2010). National Internet domains – symbols of state borders and limitless possibilities, MGIMO Review of International Relations, 5 (14), 307–314. (In Russian)
Chaikisova, A. V. (2017). Specificity of ideonyms as a special type of proper names, Current problems of German studies, novelistic studies and Russian studies, 3, 23–24. (In Russian)
Couture, S., Toupin, S. (2020). What does the concept of “sovereignty” mean in the digital world?, Bulletin of international organizations: education, science, new economy, 15, 4, 48–69. https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2020-04-03(In Russian)
Daldinova, E. O. G., Bardaeva, D. V. (2021). Characteristics of German-language siteonyms, Integration processes in modern science: collection of scientific papers based on the materials of the XIX International Scientific-Practical Conference, Anapa, 10–13. (In Russian)
Daldinova, E. O. G., Buraeva, Т. В. (2023). The characteristic structure of German speaking siteonym, Bulletin of Issyk Kul University, 54–2, 65–73. (In Russian)
Dedova, O. V., Kuprienko, M. S. (2013). Heading complex in electronic communication, Moscow University Bulletin. Series 9. Philology, 1, 61–70. (In Russian)
Dubinina, M. N. (2022). Digital codes of Internet communication (using the example of English, Russian and Chinese languages), Current problems of German-Roman philology and methods of teaching foreign languages: Collection of scientific articles, 23–26. (In Russian)
Dukhanina, L. N., Maksimenko, A. A. (2020). Analysis of network oncology discourse of a three-year retrospective in the top-level domain RU, VOPROSY ONKOLOGII, 66 (4), 315–324. https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2020-66-4-315-324(In Russian)
Filimonenko, E. N. (2023). Cultural and linguistic aspects of German-language siteonyms, Research Center “Vector of Development”, 19, 185–190. (In Russian)
Fu, Y. (2013). Yīnghàn shùzì xiéyīn cí yìtóng de shēncéng jiěxī [An in-depth analysis of the similarities and differences between English and Chinese numerical homophonic words]. Language Application Research, 9.135–137. (In Chinese)
Gabdrakhmanova, G. F., Mahmutov, Z. A. (2018). National Internet of Russia: problem statement revisited, Oriental Studies. Vol. 11, № 3(37), 142–151. https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2018-37-3-142-151(In Russian)
Han, Yu. (2022). Cultural understanding of homonymy of numerals in modern Chinese, Modern Oriental Studies, 4 (2), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.24412/2686-9675-2-2022-30-39(In Russian)
Ignatov A. (2022). The BRICS agenda on the Internet governance, international organisations research journal, Vol. 17, № 2, 86–109. https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2022-02-04
Kalyatin, V. O. (2002). Domain names, Moscow: Information and Publishing Center of Rospatent “INIC”, 188. (In Russian)
Karpenko, M. Yu. (2012). Identification of the basic unit of the Internet onomasticon, Mova, 17, 113–115. (In Ukrainian)
Karpenko, M. Yu. (2014). Motivation of siteonyms of the English-language sector of the Internet, Bulletin of Voronezh State University. Series: Linguistics and intercultural communication, 2, 35–39. (In Russian)
Ke, X. (2020). Zhōngwén yùmíng de qiánshì jīnshēng [The past and present life of Chinese domain names]. Zhongguancun Theory. 12. 66–68. (In Chinese)
Kersten, S., Lotze, N. (2022). Anonymity and authenticity on the web: Towards a new framework in internet onomastics. Internet Pragmatics, 5(1), 38–65. https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00074.ker
Khazova A. (2023). Linguistic studies of computer-mediated communication, Voprosy Jazykoznanija, 2, 144–156. https://doi.org/10.31857/0373-658X.2023.2.144-156
Kuprienko, M. S. (2010). Linguistic stylistic analysis of methods for creating Runet domain names, In: Hypertext as an object of linguistic research: Proceedings of the All-Russian scientific and practical conference with international participation, 80–83. (In Russian)
Kuznetsov, A. V. (2012). Language game in domain names, Science and business: ways of development, 4 (10), 42–44. (In Russian)
Li, J. (2010). Zhōngwén yùmíng yǔ jìng xià de yùmíng zhùcè wèntí xīn jiě [New solutions to domain name registration issues in the context of Chinese domain names]. Journal of Hunan Public Security College. 22 (4). 117–121. (In Chinese)
Madieva, G. B., Suprun, V. I. (2017). General problems of onomastics, Theory and practice of onomastic and derivatological research, In: Collective monograph in memory of the Honored Scientist of the Republic of Adygea and Kuban, 11–51. (In Russian)
Polyak, Yu. E. (2018). Internationalized Cyrillic top-level domains, In: Modern problems and perspective directions of innovative development of science: a collection of articles based on the results of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, 116–119. (In Russian)
Rozhkova, M. (2015). Domain names as identifiers and means of communication, Economy and Law, 3(458), 55–70. (In Russian)
Ryabchenko, N. A. (2016). Toponymy of the network landscape of online space, Community. Control, Vol. 17, no. 4, 98–115. (In Russian)
Shirin, S. S. (2014). Russian initiatives in Internet governance, MGIMO Review of International Relations, 6(39), 73–81. (In Russian)
Son, L. P. (2012). Virtual onomastics and non-verbal component of Internet communication, Scientific Bulletin of the Voronezh State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering. Series: Modern linguistic and methodological-didactic research, 18, 123–134. (In Russian)
Son, L. P. (2009). Virtual interaction: “What’s in your name...”, Scientific notes of the Russian State Social University, 6 (69), 217–221. (In Russian)
Suprun, V. I. (2004). Development of the onomastic space of the Internet, In: Onomastics of the Volga Region. Materials of the IX International Conference on Onomastics of the Volga Region, 53–59. (In Russian)
Xiang, X. (2012). Linguistic and Cultural Characteristics of Domain Names of the Top Fifty Most-Visited Websites in the US and China: A Cross-Linguistic Study of Domain Names and e-Branding. Names, 60(4), 210–219. https://doi.org/10.1179/0027773812Z.00000000032(In English)
Zakalkin, P. V. (2022). Evolution of Cyberspace Management Systems, Cybersecurity Issues, 1 (47), 76-86. https://doi.org/10.21681/2311-3456-2012-1-76-86(In Russian)
Zhiltsov, D. A. (2020). Features of domain naming in the Internet marketing strategy of an organization, Marketing and logistics, 3 (29), 33-40. (In Russian)
Zubareva, A. V. (2021a). New trends in the system of non-personal proper names in the Russian language, Linguistic and rhetorical paradigm: theoretical and applied aspects, 26–2, 100–102. (In Russian)
Zubareva, A. V. (2021b). Onims in Internet communication: new phenomena and functions, Current problems of philology and pedagogical linguistics, 1, 120–136. https://doi.org/10.29025/2079-6021-2021-1-120-136(In Russian)
Zhou, Y. (2003). Shùzì xiéyīn de yǎnbiàn [The evolution of number homophony], Rhetoric Learning, 1, 35–37. (In Chinese)
Zhu, G. (2014). Wèishéme zhōngguó hùliánwǎng dìzhǐ piānhào shùzì yùmíng [Why do Chinese Internet addresses prefer digital domain names?], Computers and Networks, 1, 43–44. (InChinese)