Strategies for enhancing students’ reading interest: A textbook study
Much research on interest has taken place in the educational field of reading, raising questions about text-based interest. The study examines how discourse structures affect students’ interest in textbooks and focuses on three strategies: contextualisation, problem solving, and concrete elaboration. It used linguapragmatic methods to analyse text materials and describe linguistic structures of the strategies. A total of 386 eighth-grade students from Russian secondary schools took part in the experiment. The participants read passages from a textbook and rated them according to qualities on a scale. Rating scales measured a target quality (text interestingness) and predictor qualities (individual interest in the school subject, text novelty, text complexity, text comprehensibility, and text originality). To analyse their impact on interest, the correlation and regression models were calculated. It was found that participants’ reading interest depended on variations in the text stimuli. Originality and (stable) individual interests were the most prominent predictors of participants’ situational reading interest. The strategies increase text-based interest by presenting knowledge in original discursive ways. However, text-based predictors did not fully explain the variability in interestingness. The findings suggest that participants’ appraisals of text characteristics are not a comprehensive source of reading interest. The findings also provide an insight into the fact that the interest factor is beyond students’ genre expectations about textbooks. In light of the findings, the study benefits guidance for educational practitioners, textbook authors, and textbook editors. It delineates resources to enhance students’ interest in expository texts.
Figures
Trushchelev, P. N. (2025). Strategies for enhancing students’ reading interest: A textbook study, Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, 11 (1), 107-124.
While nobody left any comments to this publication.
You can be first.
Ainley, M. (2017). Interest: Knowns, unknowns, and basic processes, in O’Keefe, P. A. and Harackiewicz, J. M. (eds.), The Science of Interest, Springer, N.Y., US, 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55509-6_1(In English)
Bermejo-Berros, J., Lopez-Diez, J. and Martínez, M. A. G. (2022). Inducing narrative tension in the viewer through suspense, surprise, and curiosity, Poetics, 93, 101664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2022.101664(In English)
Bondi, M. (2018). Dialogicity in written language use: Variation across expert action games, in Weigand, E. and Kecskes, I. (eds.), From Pragmatics to Dialogue. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Philadelphia, US, 137–170. https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.31.08bon(In English)
Choi, S. M. (2006). Two Types of Text-Based Situational Interest Evoking Strategies: Seductive Details and Concrete Elaboration and Their Effects on the 1st Year EFL High School Students’ Written Text Comprehension and Interest, PhD thesis, State University at Buffalo, Buffalo, US. (In English)
Clinton, V and Walkington, C. (2019). Interest-enhancing approaches to mathematics curriculum design: Illustrations and personalization, The Journal of Educational Research, 112 (4), 495–511. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/d4q2m(In English)
Clinton-Lisell, V. (2022). Reading medium and interest: Effects and interactions, Educational Psychology, 42 (2), 142–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2021.2016635(In English)
Connelly, D. A. (2011). Applying Silvia’s model of interest to academic text: Is there a third appraisal?, Learning and Individual Differences, 21 (5), 624–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.04.007(In English)
Duke, N. K., Pearson, P. D., Strachan, S. L. and Billman, A. K. (2011). Essential elements of fostering and teaching reading comprehension, What research has to say about reading instruction, 4, 286–314. https://doi.org/10.1598/0829.03(In English)
Fetzer, A. (2021). Computer-mediated discourse in context: Pluralism of communicative action and discourse common ground, in Xie, Ch., Yus, F. and Haberland, H. (eds.), Approaches to Internet Pragmatics. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Philadelphia, US, 47–74. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.318.02fet(In English)
Friedrich, M. C. and Heise, E. (2022). The influence of comprehensibility on interest and comprehension, Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000349(In English)
Fulmer, S. M., D’Mello, S. K., Strain, A. and Graesser, A. C. (2015). Interest-based text preference moderates the effect of text difficulty on engagement and learning, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 98–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.12.005(In English)
Golke, S. and Wittwer, J. (2024). Informative narratives increase students’ situational interest in science topics, Learning and Instruction, 93, 101973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101973(In English)
Graumann, C. F. and Kallmeyer, W. (Eds.). (2002). Perspective and Perspectivation in Discourse. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Philadelphia, US. (In English)
Hidi, S. and Baird, W. (1988). Strategies for increasing text-based interest and students’ recall of expository texts, Reading Research Quarterly, 23 (4), 465–483. https://doi.org/10.2307/747644(In English)
Hoeken, H. and van Vliet, M. (2000). Suspense, curiosity, and surprise: How discourse structure influences the affective and cognitive processing of a story, Poetics, 27 (4), 277–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-422X(99)00021-2(In English)
Hyland, K. (2014). Dialogue, community and persuasion in research writing, in Gil-Salom, L. and Soler-Monreal, C. (eds.), Dialogicity in Written Specialised Genres, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Philadelphia, US, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.23.02hyl(In English)
Kasper, M., Uibu, K. and Mikk, J. (2018). Language teaching strategies’ impact on third-grade students’ reading outcomes and reading interest, International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10 (5), 601–610. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2018541309(In English)
Leckie-Tarry, H. (1991). Register: A Functional Linguistic Theory, PhD thesis, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia. (In English)
Lepper, C., Stang, J. and McElvany, N. (2021). Gender differences in text‐based interest: Text characteristics as underlying variables, Reading Research Quarterly, 57 (2), 537–554. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.420(In English)
Lewin, B. A., Fine, J. and Young, L. (2001). Expository Discourse: A Genre-based Approach to Social Research Text, Continuum, London, UK, N.Y., US. (In English)
Liebfreund, M. D. (2021). Cognitive and motivational predictors of narrative and informational text comprehension, Reading Psychology, 42 (2), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2021.1888346(In English)
Lievers, F. S., Bolognesi, M. and Winter, B. (2021). The linguistic dimensions of concrete and abstract concepts: lexical category, morphological structure, countability, and etymology, Cognitive Linguistics, 32 (4), 641–670. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2021-0007(In English)
List, A., Stephens, L. A. and Alexander, P. A. (2019). Examining interest throughout multiple text use, Reading and Writing, 32, 307–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9863-4(In English)
Makkonen‑Craig, H. (2014). Aspects of dialogicity: Exploring dynamic interrelations in written discourse. In A.‑M. Karlsson (ed.), Analysing text and talk, Uppsala universitet, Uppsala, Finland, 99–120. (In English)
Markey, A. and Loewenstein, G. (2014). Curiosity, in Pekrun, R. and Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (eds.), International Handbook of Emotions in Education, Routledge, London, UK, N.Y., US, 228–245. (In English)
Meyer, B. J. F. and Rey, M. N. (2011). Structure strategy interventions: Increasing reading comprehension of expository text, International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4 (1), 127–152. (In English)
Mikk, J. (2000). Textbook: Research and Writing, Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main, Berlin, Germany, Bern, Switzerland, Bruxelles, Belgium, N.Y., US, Wien, Austria. (In English)
Mikk, J. and Kukemelk, H. (2010). The relationship of text features to the level of interest in science texts, Trames: A Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 14 (1), 54–70. https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2010.1.04(In English)
Parodi, G. (2014). Genre organization in specialized discourse: Disciplinary variation across university textbooks, Discourse Studies, 16 (1), 65–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445613496355(In English)
Phan, W. M. J., Amrhein, R., Rounds, J. and Lewis, P. (2019). Contextualizing interest scales with emojis: Implications for measurement and validity, Journal of Career Assessment, 27 (1), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072717748647(In English)
Phan, L. N. and Tin, T. B. (2022). Exploring learner interest in relation to humanistic language teaching materials: A case from Vietnam, System, 105 (5), 102731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102731(In English)
Pinoliad, E. (2021). Contextualization in Teaching Short Stories: Students’ Interest and Comprehension, Middle Eastern Journal of Research in Education and Social Sciences, 2 (1), 31–55. https://doi.org/10.47631/mejress.v2i1.167(In English)
Piotrovskaya, L. A. and Trushchelev, P. N. (2021a). Linguistic approach to study of strategies for increasing text-based interest, European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 108, 276–283. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2021.05.02.33(In English)
Piotrovskaya L. А. and Trushchelev P. N. (2021b). The effect of expository text structure on text-based interest: Problem-based exposition (the linguistic aspect), Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Language and Literature, 18 (4), 792–809. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu09.2021.410(In Russian)
Piotrovskaya, L. A. and Trushchelev, P. N. (2022). Communicating recipient’s emotions: Text-triggered interest, Training, Language and Culture, 6 (1), 60–74. https://doi.org/10.22363/2521-442X-2022-6-1-60-74(In English)
Plonsky, L. and Ghanbar, H. (2018). Multiple regression in L2 research: A methodological synthesis and guide to interpreting R2 values, The Modern Language Journal, 102 (4), 713–731. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12509(In English)
Qin, W. and Uccelli, P. (2019). Metadiscourse: Variation across communicative contexts, Journal of Pragmatics, 139, 22–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.10.004(In English)
Renninger K. A., Bachrach J. E. and Hidi S. E. (2019). Triggering and maintaining interest in early phases of interest development, Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 23, 100260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2018.11.007(In English)
Renninger, K. A., Gantt, A. L. and Lipman, D. A. (2023). Comprehension of argumentation in mathematical text: what is the role of interest?, ZDM Mathematics Education, 55, 371–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01445-4(In English)
Renninger, K. A. and Hidi, S. E. (2019). Interest development and learning, in Renninger, K. A. and Hidi, S. E. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Motivation and Learning, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 265–290. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316823279.013(In English)
Renninger, K. A. and Hidi, S. E. (2022). Interest development, self-related information processing, and practice, Theory into Practice, 61 (1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2021.1932159(In English)
Sadoski, M. and Paivio, A. (2013). Imagery and Text: A Dual Coding Theory of Reading and Writing, Routledge, London UK, N. Y., US. (In English)
Schiefele, U. (2009). Situational and individual interest, in Wentzel, K. R. and Wigfield, A. (eds.), Handbook of Motivation at School, Routledge, London, UK, N. Y., US, 197–222. (In English)
Schiefele, U. and Löweke, S. (2017). The nature, development, and effects of elementary students’ reading motivation profiles, Reading Research Quarterly, 53 (4), 405–421. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.201(In English)
Schraw, G. and Lehman, S. (2001). Situational interest: A review of the literature and directions for future research, Educational Psychology Review, 13 (1), 23–52. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009004801455(In English)
Scott, C. (2021). You won't believe what's in this paper! Clickbait, relevance and the curiosity gap, Journal of Pragmatics, 175, 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.12.023(In English)
Shin, J., Chang, Y. and Kim, Y. (2016). Effects of expository-text structures on text-based interest, comprehension, and memory, The SNU Journal of Education Research, 25 (2), 39–57. (In English)
Shulman, H. C., Dixon, G. N., Bullock, O. M. and Colón Amill, D. (2020). The effects of jargon on processing fluency, self-perceptions, and scientific engagement, Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 39 (5–6), 579–597. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X20902177(In English)
Silvia, P. J. (2006). Exploring the Psychology of Interest, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, N.Y., US. (In English)
Sorokin, Yu. A. (1985). Psikholingvisticheskie aspekty izucheniya teksta [The Psycholinguistic Aspect of Text Studies], Nauka, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1998). Relevance: Communication and Cognition, Blackwell, Oxford, UK, Cambridge, USA. (In English)
Springer, S. E., Dole, J. A. and Hacker, D. J. (2017). The role of interest in reading comprehension. In S. E. Israel (ed.), Handbook of Research on Reading Comprehension, Guilford, N.Y., USA, London, UK, 519–542. (In English)
Talanina, A. A. (2021). Zhanr lektsii v uchebno-nauchnom diskurse [Genre of the Lecture in Academic Discourse], PhD thesis abstract, Saint Petersburg Mining University, St. Petersburg, Russia. (In Russian)
Trushchelev, P. N. (2022). Text-based interest from a linguistic perspective: emotive pragmatics of history textbooks, Philological Sciences. Scientific Essays of Higher Education, (2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.20339/PhS.2-22.081(In Russian)
van der Sluis, F., van den Broek, E. L., Glassey, R. J., van Dijk, E. M. A. G. and de Jong, F. M. G. (2014). When complexity becomes interesting, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65 (7), 1478–1500. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23095(In English)
van Dijk, T. A. and Atienza E. (2011). Knowledge and discourse in secondary school social science textbooks, Discourse Studies, 13 (1), 93–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445610387738(In English)
Wade, S. E. (2001). research on importance and interest: Implications for curriculum development and future research, Educational Psychology Review, 13 (3), 243–261. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016623806093(In English)
Wharton, T., Bonard, C., Dukes, D., Sander, D. and Oswald S. (2021). Relevance and emotion. Journal of Pragmatics, 181, 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.06.001(In English)
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. (2012). Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, N. Y., USA, Melbourne, Australia , Madrid, Spain, Cape Town, South Africa, Singapore, Singapore, São Paulo, Brazil, Delhi, India, Mexico City, Mexico. (In English)
he article was prepared in full within the state assignment of Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation for 2025–2027 (No. FZNM-2025-0001). I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the reviewers for their valuable comments and constructive feedback, which significantly contributed to the improvement of the article.