Linguistic identity, national archetypes and sociocultural environment of their formation
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the current state of the categories “linguistic identity” and “national archetype” in correlation with the socio-cultural environment. The national and cultural values of any ethno psychological group are reflected in the language serving a real-life community of people. National archetypes are the semiotic basis of linguistic identity, which is formed within a certain socio-cultural context, an inalienable instance of the psychophysical structure of a person. It is argued that the essential characteristics of the national linguistic identity can be detected already at the level of identifying the semantic features of the language units of the utterance in discoursing. The next steps to reconstruct the linguistic personality are associated with modelling the logical-semantic structure of the utterance, due to the presence of ethnocultural traces at all levels of the subject's discourse behaviour. The discourse behaviour of an individual is the essence of his communicative activity and worldview. It was found that behavioural models, modal and nominative ways of reflecting reality are ethnoculturally determined not only by language, but also by immanent preferences in accordance with the logic, semantics and pragmatics of the communicative act. It is suggested that the verbalization of Russian identity (the magic of Russian vocabulary) is preferably carried out within the framework of contact strategies (direct means of expressing thoughts) and in correlation with the values of the national community, and the intellectual parameters of the French language are implemented in line with distant communication strategies (indirect means expressions of thought) and the priority of individual values. Prospects for the application of the method of reconstructing new knowledge in the mainstream of identifying the dominant features of a national linguistic personality in languages of different structures are outlined.
Sedykh A. P. (2021). Linguistic identity, national archetypes and sociocultural environment of their formation. Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, V.7 (3), 15-27, DOI: 10.18413/2313-8912-2021-7-3-0-2
While nobody left any comments to this publication.
You can be first.
Baraboshina, N.V. (2020). Boundary phenomenon Bakhtin’s philosophy, Aspirantskiy Vestnik Povolzhiya, 20 (3-4), 41-47. (In Russian)
Benveniste, E. (2010). Obshhaja lingvistika [General linguistics], Librokom, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)
Blanchard, G. (1974). La galaxie des clichés selon McLuhan, Communication et langages, 5-15. (In French)
Bock, F.K. (1999). The structure of society and the structure of language, Foreign linguistics, Moscow, Progress, 115-129. (In Russian)
Druzhinin, V.N. (2007). Psihologija sem'i [Family psychology], Peter, SPb, Russia. (In Russian)
Gak, V.G. (2018). Sopostavitel'naja leksikologija (na materiale francuzskogo i russkogo jazykov) [Comparative lexicology: Based on the material of the French and Russian languages], Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)
Jackendoff, R. (1984). Semantics and Cognition, MA: THE MIT Press, XIV, Cambridge, UK. (In English)
Johnston, A. and Malabou, C. (2013). Self and emotional life: philosophy, psychoanalysis, and neuroscience, U.S.: Columbia University Press, New York. (In English)
Jung, K.G. (2020). Man and his symbols, Institute of General Humanitarian Research, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)
Kristeva, J. (2020). Dostoïevski. Les auteurs de ma vie, Buchet/Chastel, Paris, France. (In French)
Likhachev, D.S. (1993). Stat'i rannih let [Articles of the early years (collection)], Tver branch of the Russian Cultural Foundation, Tver, Russia. (In Russian)
Lotman, Yu.M. (1999). Vnutri mysljashhih mirov : Chelovek-tekst-semiosfera-istorija [Inside thinking worlds. Man-text-semiosphere-history]. Languages of Russian culture, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)
Makhovskaya, O.I. (2003). Russian women and children in France, available at: http://www.owl.ru/win/womplus/2003/02_07.html (Accessed 25 July 2021). (In Russian)
Makovsky, M.M. (2013). Sravnitel'nyj slovar' mifologicheskoj simvoliki v indoevropejskih jazykah : Obraz mira i miry obrazov [Comparative dictionary of mythological symbolism in Indo-European languages. Image of the world and worlds of images], Vlados, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)
Mandelstam, O. (1987). Slovo i kul'tura [Word and culture], Sov. writer, Moscow, USSR. (In Russian)
Mikhalskaya, A.K. (1996). Russkij Sokrat: Lekcii po sravn.-ist. ritorike [Russian Socrates: Lectures on comparative historical rhetoric], Academia, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)
Paducheva, E.V. (1996). Semanticheskie issledovanija : Semantika vremeni i vida v rus. jaz. Semantika narrative [Semantic research (Semantics of time and type in Russian; Semantics of narrative)], Languages of Russian culture, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)
Prigogine, I.R. and Stengers, I. (2020). Vremja. Haos. Kvant [Time, chaos, quantum], Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)
Sapir, E. (1993). Izbrannye trudy po yazykoznaniyu i kulturologii [Selected works on linguistics and cultural studies], Publishing group Progress, Univers, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)
Sedykh, A.P., Ivanishcheva, O.N., Koreneva, A.V. and Ryzhkova, I.V. (2018). Modern Philological Knowledge: Anthropocentrism and Linguistic Identity, International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE), 7 4 (38), 447-451. (In English)
Shaposhnikov, V.N. (1998). Russkaja rech' 1990-h : sovremennaja Rossija v jazykovom otobrazhenii [Russian speech of the 1990s. Modern Russia in linguistic representation], MALP, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)
Shaposhnikova, I.V. (2021). Integrating role of the conception language personality in the development of the theory of language, Bulletin of the Peoples' Friendship University of Russia. Series: Theory of language. Semiotics. Semantics, 12 (2), 279-301. (In English)
Skvortsov, L.I. (1996). Jekologija slova, ili Pogovorim o kul'ture russkoj rechi [Ecology of the word, or Let's talk about the culture of Russian speech], Education, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian)
Timofeev, A.A. (2019). Theory of the text in Roland Barthes’ S/Z and academic musical performance, Bulletin of Vaganova Ballet Academy, 3, 228-239. (In English)
Wierzbicka, A. (1991). Cross-cultural pragmatics: The semantics of human interaction, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, N.Y. (In English)