Language economy and multilingualism: the case of Tatarstan
This interdisciplinary article is written at the intersection of ethnography of language policy and language economy – a science, underestimated both by (socio)linguists and economists. It aims to identify whether the competence in a minority language affects people's income taking the example of one of the regions of the Russian Federation – the Republic of Tatarstan. The data were collected in October 2021 through a sociolinguistic survey, interviewing, and ethnographic observation. The empirical analysis revealed the absence of a positive correlation between the income of the majority of respondents and their knowledge of the Tatar language. At the same time, for a third of the respondents such knowledge brings both direct and indirect benefits, from establishing business and personal contacts with the Turkic-speaking world to employment opportunities and part-time jobs in the areas where knowledge of Tatar is necessary. The negative relationship between the Tatar language proficiency and income is primarily due to the state language policy and legislation of the country aimed at promoting the Russian language. Overall, the study concludes that the economic value of minority languages remains low and that there are different types of arguments for language choice. The choice of a minority language is motivated by the importance of language for culture and ethnic identity, while the choice of a dominant language is motivated by economic and pragmatic arguments (soft arguments vs. hard arguments). The importance of the monetary component in people’s language decisions allows to make a rather pessimistic forecast about the future of minority languages.
Khilkhanova, E. V. (2022). Language economy and multilingualism: the case of Tatarstan, Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, 8 (2), 52-65. DOI: 10.18413/2313-8912-2022-8-2-0-4
While nobody left any comments to this publication.
You can be first.
Kozhemyakina, V. A. (2010). Mnogoyazychnaya Kanada: sotsiolingvisticheskiy portret [Multilingual Canada: a sociolinguistic portrait], Voprosy filologii, 2 (35), 23-31. (In Russian)
Breton, A. (ed.) (1998). New Canadian Perspectives: Economic Approaches to Language and to Bilingualism, Canadian Heritage, Ottawa – Ontario, Canada. (In English)
Chiswick, B. and Miller, P. (2003). The Complementarity of Language and Other Human Capital: Immigrant Earnings in Canada, Economics of Education Review, 22 (5), 469-480. (In English)
Gazzola, M. and Wickström, B.-A. (2016). Introduction, in Gazzola, M. and Wickström, B.-A. (eds.), The economics of language policy, MIT Press, Cambridge, UK, 1–18. (In English)
Grenier, G. and Vaillancourt, F. (1983). An Economic Perspective on Learning a Second Language, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 4 (6), 471-483. (In English)
Grenier, G. (1987). Earnings by Language Group in Quebec in 1980 and Emigration From Quebec Between 1976 and 1981, Canadian Journal of Economics, 20, 774-791. (In English)
Hefin, T., Brett, D., Glover, A. and Eluned, G. (2020). The Welsh language and the economy: a review of evidence and methods, Cardiff: Welsh Government, GSR report number 10/2020, available at: https://gov.wales/welsh-language-and-economy (Accessed 2 November 2021). (In English)
Johnson, D. (2009). Ethnography of language policy, Language Policy, 8 (2), 139–159. (In English)
Johnson, D. (2013). Language policy, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137316202(In English)
May, S. (2001). Language and Minority Rights. Ethnicity, Nationalism and the Politics of Language, Pearson Education, Harlow, UK. (In English)
McCarty, T. (2015). Ethnography in language planning and policy research, in Hult, F. and Johnson, D. (eds.), Research methods in language policy and planning: A practical guide, Wiley Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 81–93. (In English)
Pawlowski, A. (2020). Does multilingualism pay off? Reflections on the economics of language, in Tender, T. and Eichinger, L. M. (eds.), Language and Economy: Language industries in a Multilingual Europe. Contributions to the EFNIL Conference 2019 in Tallinn, Research Institute for Linguistics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary, 111-120. (In English)
Sperlich, S. and Uriarte, J.-R. (2015). Economics and (Minority) Language: Why is it so hard to save a threatened language? Available at: https://www.parisschoolofeconomics.eu/IMG/pdf/economicslanguage240515.pdf (Accessed 2 November 2021). (In English)
Uriarte, J.-R. and Sperlich, S. (2016). Economic Theory and Minority Language, The Economics of language policy, available at: https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:124680 (Accessed 2 November 2021). http://dx.doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262034708.003.0007(In English)
Zhang, W. and Grenier, G. (2012). How can Language be linked to Economics? A Survey of Two Strands of Research, Language Problems and Language Planning, 37, 203-226. (In English)
Ambrosch-Baroua, T., Kropp, A. and Müller-Lancé, J. (Hg) (2017). Mehrsprachigkeit und Ökonomie, Open Publishing LMU, München, Germany. (In German)
ELAN: Auswirkungen mangelnder Fremdsprachenkenntnisse in den Unternehmen auf die europäische Wirtschaft. December 2006, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/assets/eac/languages/policy/strategic-framework/documents/elan_de.pdf (Accessed 1 November 2021). (In German)
Wickström, B.-A. (2014). Nachhaltiges Überleben von Minderheitensprachen: eine Übersicht einiger Modelle, in Dötsch, J. (Hg.), Dogma und Evolution: Beiträge zum 60. Geburtstag von Dietmar Meyer, Metropolis-Verlag, Marburg, Germany, 101–126. (In German)
Gazzola, M. (2015). Il Valore Economico Delle Lingue (The Economic Value of Languages), available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2691086 (Accessed 2 December 2021). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2691086(In Italian)
The reported study was funded by RFBR and DFG, project number № 21-512-12002 ННИО_а “Prognostic methods and future scenarios in language policy – multilingual Russia as an example”.