A Comparative Reading of Pāṇinian Grammatical Tradition and Modern Science of Speech
The modern history of Western linguistics began with comparative philology and coincided with the colonisation of the East for a long time.The colonisation as a process not only involved an interplay of power, dominance and state, it was also a conquest of knowledge. Colonies such as India had a vast rubric of ancient knowledge and especially excelled in linguistics and philology. This paper is an attempt to showcase how the roots of various phonetic and phonological theories that defined and dominated modern linguistics were linked to the ancient Indian grammatical tradition. Scholars from Pāṇinian School of Grammar, such as Pāṇini, Kātyāyana, Patañjali, and Bhartṛhari, have explained a range of speech phenomena to which modern phonetics and phonology correspond significantly. This paper analyses the common grounds between prominent schools of Western phonology and their Indian counterparts and thus highlights a significant theoretical overlap between the knowledge offered by the Western linguistic schools and what was explained several centuries back by prominent Indian grammarians. From the linking of sounds to the psychological reality of a phoneme, the vast canvas of the Indian linguistic tradition could be verifiably seen as a precursor to the most of the structural turn in the twentieth century. Finally, the paper attempts to show the precedence of various recent concepts and theories, such as ‘distinctive feature theory’ or ‘generative grammar’ in the texts like Aṣṭādhyāyī and Vākyapdīya.
While nobody left any comments to this publication.
You can be first.
Abercrombie, D. (1949). What is a “letter?”, Lingua, 2, 54-63.
Allen, W. S. (1953). Phonetics in Ancient India. London: Oxford University Press.
Anderson, S. R. (2021). Phonology in the Twentieth Century, Language Science Press, Berlin.
Atherton, M. (1994). Henry Sweet’s Idea of Totality: A Nineteenth Century Philologist’s Approach to the Practical Study of Language. D. Phil. thesis. University of York, York, England.
Pataskar, B. (2016). Philosophy of Language as Reflected in the Nirukta of Yāska, Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, 97, 143-149.
Barbieri, C. et al. (2022). A Global Analysis of Matches and Mismatches between Human genetic and Linguistic Histories, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119(47), 1–9.
Blancke, S., & Denis, G. (2018). Bringing Darwin into the social sciences and the humanities: cultural evolution and its philosophical implications. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 40(2), 1–12
Buitenen, J. A. B. V. (1959). Akṣara, Journal of the American Oriental Society 79 (3), 176-187.
Buitenen, J. A. B. V. (1955). Notes on Akṣara, Bulletin of the Deccan College Post-Graduate and Research Institute 17 (3), 204-215.
Bloomfield, L. (1957). Language, George Allen and Unwin Ltd, London.
Bronkhorst, J. (1998). Indian theories of Language, Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Taylor and Francis. DOI: 10.4324/9780415249126-F048-1
Cardona, G. (1969). “Studies in Indian Grammarians. I. The Method of Description Reflected in the Śivasūtras.” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 59 (1), 3-48.
Colas-Chauhan, U. (2008). A Śaiva Theory of Meaning, Journal of Indian Philosophy, 36(4), 427-453.
Dasgupta, S., trans. (1991). The Mahabhasya of Patañjali, Indian Council of Philosophical Research, New Delhi.
Deshpande, M. M. (2001). Ancient Indian Phonetics, in Creidler, Cherles W. (ed.) Phonology: Critical Concepts, London and New York: Routledge, I, 7-17.
Deshpande, Madhav M. (1989). Review of Aṣṭādhyāyī of Pāṇini by Sumitra M. Katre, Language, 65 (3), 646-648.
Deshpande, M. M. (1994-95). Pāṇini and the Distinctive Features, in Bulletin of the Deccan College Post-Graduate and Research Institute, 54/55 (Sir William Jones Volume Commemorating the Bicentenary), 87-97.
Deshpande, P. (2010-11). Comparative Study of Technical Terms in Vopadeva’s Mugdhabodha Grammar, Bulletin of the Deccan College Post-Graduate and Research Institute, 70/71, 409-418.
Dowson, J. (1888). A Classical Dictionary of Hindu Mythology and Religion, Geography, History, and Literature, Trubner & Co, London.
Dresher, B.E. (2011). “The Phoneme.” In The Blackwell Companion to Phonology edited by M. Oostendorp, C.J. Ewen, E. Hume and K. Rice. doi: 10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0011.
Manjali, F. 2012. “The ‘Social’ and the ‘Cognitive’ in Language: A Reading of Saussure, and Beyond.” Texto! 17 (3). 1-15.
Folgado, M. J. G., et al. (2020). Language and Linguistics. The Year’s Work in Modern Language Studies, 80, 313–339. Ghosh, Manmohan. (1938). Pāṇinīya Śikṣā: Or, The Śikṣā Vedaṅga Ascribed to Pāṇini. Calcutta: The University of Calcutta.
Ghosh, A., & Kiparsky, P. (2019). Perspective: The Grammar of the Elements. American Scientist, 107(6), 350–355.
Ghosh, M. (1938). Pāṇiniya Śikṣā. University of Calcutta.
Gillon, B. S. (2007). “Pāṇini’s ‘Aṣṭādhyāyī’ and Linguistic Theory.” Journal of Indian Philosophy, 35 (5/6), 445–468.
Gleason, H. A. (1961). An Introduction to Descriptive Linguistics,Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Canada
Halle, M., and Clements, G. N. (1983). Problem Book in Phonolohy: A Workbook for Introductory Courses in Linguistics and in Modern Phonology, MIT Press
Holdcroft, D. (1991). Saussure: Signs, System, and Arbitrariness. Cambridge University Press.
Houben, J. EM. (1989-90). The Sequencelessness of the Signifier in Bhartṛhari’s Theory of Language, Indologica Taurinensia, 15-16, 119-129.
Jakobson, R. (1978). Six Lectures on Sound and Meaning translated by J. Mepham. Hassocks: Harvester.
Jones, D. (1969). An Outline of English Phonetics: with 116 Illustration: and with Appendices on “Types of Phonetic Transcription” and “American Pronunciation”, W. Heffer & Sons Ltd, Cambridge.
Jones, W. (1788). Asiatick Researches— I,Asiatick Society, Calcutta.
Joseph, J. E. (2012). Saussure, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Joshi, S. D., and J. A. F. Roodbergen. (1995). The Aṣṭādhyāyī of Pāṇini, Sahitya Akademi, New Delhi
Iyer, K. A. S. (1965). Bhartṛhari on Dhvani, Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, 46 (1/4), 49-65.
Koerner, E. F. K. (1993). “Historiography of Phonetics: The State of the Art.” Journal of the International Phonetic Association 23 (1). 1-12.
Laver, J. 1994. Principles of Phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Li, C. (2018). Sounding out Différance, Philosophy East and West, 68, 2, 447-459.
Łucyszyna, O. (2016). Classical Sāṁkhya on the Relationship between a Word and Its Meaning, Journal of Indian Philosophy, 44 (2). 303- 323.
Matilal, B. K. (2017). Logic, Language and Reality: Indian Philosophy and Contemporary Issues,Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Private Limited, New Delhi.
Nelson, S., (2022) “A Model Theoretic Perspective on Phonological Feature Systems”, Society for Computation in Linguistics 5(1), 1-9. doi:10.7275/g77n-za52
Patterson, J. (2023) ‘William Jones and the Study of Hinduism’, Global Intellectual History, 10(2), 109–117. doi: 10.1080/23801883.2023.2184408.
Pillai, K. R. trans. 1971. The Vākyapadīya: Critical Text of Cantos I and II. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Sagey, E. (1986). The Representation of Features in Non-Linear Phonology, Routledge.
Saussure, F. D. (1959). Course in General Linguistics translated by Wade Baskin, and edited by Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye, Philosophical Library, New York.
Sharma, R. N. (2000). The Aṣṭādhyāyī of PāṇiniVol. II,Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers, New Delhi.
Staal, J. F. (1962). “A Method of Linguistic Description: The Order of Consonants According to Pāṇini.” Language 38 (1). 1-10.
Stawarska, B. (2020) Saussure’s Linguistics, Structuralism, and Phenomenology: The Course in General Linguistics after a Century,Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Stewart, I. (2023) ‘William Jones’ Legacy in Britain: Philology, Mythography, Ethnology’, Global Intellectual History, 10(2), pp. 149–157. doi: 10.1080/23801883.2023.2184406.
Subrahmanyam, K. (1992). The Vākyapadīyam of Bhartṛhari: Brahmakanda, Sri Satguru Publications, New Delhi.
Sweet, H. (1877). A Handbook of Phonetics Including a Popular Exposition of the Principles of Spelling Reform,Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Sweet, H. (1900). The History of Language, J. M. Dent and Sons, London.
Twaddell, W. F. (1935). On Defining the Phoneme, Language, (1). 5-62.
Varma, S. (1961). Critical Studies in the Phonetic Observations of Indian Grammarians,Vol. VIII, Munshi Ram Manohar Lal, New Delhi.
Wrenn, C. L. (2002). Henry Sweet (1845-1912), in Portrait of Linguists: A Biographical Source Book for the History of Western Linguistics (1746-1963), Vol 1 edited by Thomas A. Sebeok,Theommes Press, Bristol,512-32.
Zwirner, E. (1966). Bemerkungen zur Geschichte der Phonetik. in Zwirner, E. & K., Grundfragen der Phonometrie, ,S. K, Basel, 17-110.